you don't have AI work because humans don't create AI work
this is like saying "when people complain about my McDonalds cooked meal i show them my home cooked meal"
only one of them is your work. the choice to focus more on taking yourself out of the process means you don't have ownership of the work anymore.
Today is a huge win for creatives around the world, as Australia makes it clear it will not bow to pressure from AI companies to legalise the theft of creatives’ work.
From the Australian Prime Minister:
"No company should use Australian books, music, art or news to build or train AI without the artist’s control.
That includes the artist’s control of the price and value of their work.
Anything less, is theft."
Strong, principled words that should serve as a model for governments everywhere.
https://t.co/xjqnV16RCs
If you think this is ok, you don't understand art.
If you think "this is how humans learn too," you don't understand humanity.
If you use this to "create" music, you haven't actually created anything.
End of story.
Scoop: The AI music generator Suno was hacked. Hacker shared source code that shows how the tool was made and part of the music and podcasts that were scraped to create it.
Decades worth of music, lyrics, and podcasts from YouTube, Deezer, Genius & more
@bf_crane The interesting thing about this post is that it's incorrect and sucks badly. Add on the weird, unnecessary brian wilson insult and you've got yourself a certified
@matdryhurst I can only imagine how productive our conversation would be when you're out here suggesting that artists roll over and accept the heist. It seems your mouth waters for technology, not art. What a depressing way to live.
@matdryhurst If you think radicchio has anything to do with radishes it might begin to explain your sophomoric thoughts on the original topic. Do us a favor and take a year off from posting to the internet, we're all set on ai ghouls.