@InsanePPLCope@born2bbhead3d Sounds like terrible data optimization and file compression, or something. Silver lining though, before the advent of generative AI, child predators apparently carried the entire data/memory industry on their shoulders.
@fugustra1 Dude, people who make such criminally unfunny videos comparing people from one geographical location to another and making it out to be different planets, seriously need to simply be drawn and quartered, broken upon the wheel even.
@incredulousbluf@fenrirgold51925@CCanuck4 Suffering by one's own volition via exercise is not unethical or morally wrong, it is a choice made to achieve ones own desire or goal. So no, that isn't bad.
@Christophr_Fool@HMBohemond Now, I am admittedly, completely out of my depth now, so to get back on track. Humans have a sense of self, we think therefore we are as it were. So you could make the moral argument, that engaging in necrotic bestiality is a profound degration of the self. Your 'self' that is.
@Christophr_Fool@HMBohemond I get what you're saying, I don't necessarily agree with it though. But the whole premise of this 'argument' is atheism, so it is imperative to try to argue morality without religion. If God exists as you say, then religion has existed for as long as the first human thought.
@Rotosequence@Bronymon_ If you read the original thread, Rock Solid specifically mentions that they don't take the disease or illness logic as an answer to the admittedly, bad hypothetical they made. While utilitarian and logical, it would seem that they don't accept logical answers.
@ShitpostRock So this was an actual tweet? Wild stuff.
But why did you make this case with a roadkill? That's kind of weird, well the while premise of the argument is.
You could raise similar points with a human cadaver, after all, as you say, it is dead, it is victimless as you say.