@aqualover420 Sidelined? I feel like his work in the fraud task force is good for his rep (and just good in general). I haven't kept up on other stuff with him, though. Maybe he's intentionally laying low with regard to Iran stuff as he knows it's unpopular
@jam3sr0bt @upstatefederlst It's not so much the $$$ amount of tow truck and repairs, it's the disruption and time spent on all of those things. Newer cars just have less chance of that happening (excluding Korean brands or smth). Add in the greater safety, I get why families choose the pricey new cars
hi. hello. hey. yeah, so, you have all the signs of Mega-X and we're all very concerned. we need you to see the Mega-X assessment team.
the Mega-X assessment team will see if you have the signs we use to tell if someone has Mega-X. yes, you're showing all the signs of Mega-X so the assessment team has to assess if you have Mega-X.
we'll know if you have Mega-X because the assessment team will check to see if you have it. they have to check because you're showing the signs. if you have the signs you'll be diagnosed as someone who has Mega-X.
yes, you have the signs. that's why you need to be checked. if you have the signs you'll be diagnosed and enrolled in the 'people diagnosed with Mega-X program'.
no, it's not mandatory. we're just asking you to cooperate, otherwise law enforcement would have to get involved. in that case you would be deferred to a court case. at the court case they would determine if you need to be assessed for Mega-X.
how do they do that? well, obviously the court defers to the Mega-X assessment team. they're the only ones professionally trained and qualified to assess Mega-X.
there's really nothing to worry about. if the Mega-X finding team finds that you don't have the signs, you'll be dismissed, for sure. it's just that you have the signs, so in order to be responsible, we just have to check to see if you have it.
they'll be able to tell if you have it because they'll check to see if you have the signs. we... already covered that. are you... confused? this is all very simple. just sign this paper.
no, it's not a legal document. its an internal document for the Mega-X assessment team. it just says that you agree to follow the protocols outlined by the Mega-X assessment team presently and after your assessment.
no, you don't have to sign it. we're not police officers. if you don't sign it then you'll be designated as not complying with the Mega-X assessment team and law enforcement would have to get involved then, yes.
but we're not police officers. it's totally different. no one is making you sign this or go anywhere. hey, we're all on the same team here. we're just trying to help.
@SCHIZO_FREQ I'm so sorry that happened to you :/ . I've been saying it for a long time, but I think we need some sort of federal trans database. So we can VERIFY the trans girls in our DMS are actually trans, for our own mental wellbeing
@bobdaduck How did you go on 200 first dates? Where were you meeting these people? Were you just cold approaching gals or were these social acquaintances? Across how many years were the 200 dates? Sorry for barrage of questions; genuinely curious
EXCLUSIVE: Internal CBP data I obtained via FOIA request reveals 13 years of known gotaways data at the border, showing gotaways have *exploded* under the Biden admin compared to the Trump & Obama years.
This is the first time these numbers have ever been revealed.
FY2010 155,599
FY2011 86,226
FY2012 105,105
FY2013 171,663
FY2014 162,071
FY2015 101,495
FY2016 106,643
FY2017 104,294
FY2018 128,679
FY2019 151,466
FY2020 136,808
FY2021 387,398
FY2022 606,131
FY2023 670,674
For perspective, in the decade of FY 2010 through FY 2020 under both Obama & Trump, CBP recorded over 1.4 million known gotaways.
In the three years of FY 2021 through FY 2023, CBP recorded over 1.6 million known gotaways.
A reminder, @PressSec has previously claimed that Biden has “done more than anybody” to secure the border.
Known gotaways are illegal aliens seen or detected via cameras, sensors, footsign, etc, but are never apprehended.
URGENT AI SAFETY WARNING
So apparently people can use the new AI video tools to generate custom hate speech. The example here is a video of me saying some truly deplorable stuff (that I never in fact recorded myself)
This is a huge problem for all the current top AI companies that as far as I can tell is not being addressed in any capacity by anyone.
@sama@OpenAI@elonmusk@ESYudkowsky@jordanbpeterson@jason@DavidSacks Gentlemen... Do we have ANY suggestions for how to mitigate this, or are we just going to continue along until it bites us in the ass? Serious question.