@Enwagboso@SLBenfica 5) they should not defend the player or accuse him until an investigation concludes what happened, and after that they should take necessary actions. Hence my disagreement with the way Benfica is dealing with this.
@Enwagboso@SLBenfica 4) Your stance should still be suspicion and neutrality until an investigation is concluded. I'm saying Benfica is defending, and I respect that you at least want an investigation; however, I completely, completely, completely disagree with the way Benfica is dealing with this.
@Enwagboso@SLBenfica 3)Your stance of proving the allegations first, although may be fair, however lacks concision in the context of why Vini Junior would even do that.
Once you learn, when you try to connect the dots, you see that your narrative doesn't really line up.
@Enwagboso@SLBenfica 2) This bias that they have already put forth by defending the player shows a pre-emptive force against the allegations, without doing anything about them with regards to actually investigating the cause for concern.
@Enwagboso@SLBenfica You've pasted this like five times, bro. We get it, you're a Benfica fan. Benfica shouldn't be defending the player at all. The least they would do, to at least get a bit of respect, is to remain neutral until an investigation is concluded, whereby they can make a verdict.