The sentence I recently read and liked the most:
"Sweeping trouble under the rug is not the method of true philosophy, especially if it creates a bad bulge."
(Haslanger&Yablo, Amelioration as Course Correction)
@baiyunhui123@HelenaXYFang A context that licenses free choice inferences might an example. And I kind of like thinking about "might or might not p" by comparing it with "must p or must not p". There's a sense in which "must p or must not p" is informationally equivalent to "p or not p".
@baiyunhui123@HelenaXYFang I will! though I don't think sentences of the form "might or might not p" should mean something like "might p and not must p". My view is that they are generally licensed in contexts where the inference from "p or not p" to "might p and might not p" goes through.
@RealBarnimField : i think when ppl say 'might or might not p' they simply ARE conveying trivial information (hence triviality doesn't matter)
Me: oops guess i should stop writing like that in my paper
To my great surprise, on the back of my Aeon piece, I was invited to be on Connecticut Public Radio (an NPR affiliate) discussing incoherence. (The show describes itself as "public radio’s most eclectic, eccentric program.") Listen here:
https://t.co/yqXZ3iAD6j
Almost exactly a year ago, I took on the very tricky challenge of writing a piece about incoherence and structural irrationality for a lay audience. It's out in Aeon today, and I hope you'll consider reading it. Longer backstory in the thread below.
https://t.co/dLu5UwZ2lD