After months of building, testing, and refining, Just Copy is finally out.
A clipboard manager for the Mac, the way I think Apple should have made it.
It keeps everything you copy. Reach for the notch and it's all there.
$29.99 at launch (normally $49).
https://t.co/aD60nLsFEI
Is it just me or have AI tools like Claude and Codex rendered 95% of software useless. Good thing https://t.co/aD60nLsFEI is still useful and makes your workflow easier and faster! Productivity tools FTW!
Im learning as im going, trying to improve what can be improved. Nothing ships perfect on day 1. But I see thats its important to ship something and evolve along the way. What an experience!
Claude, Cursor and Codex can search what you've copied over MCP. Off until you switch it on.
Your history stays on your Mac. No account. No subscription.
$29.99 at launch, then $49. Pay once.
Apple silicon, macOS 14+. 14-day money-back guarantee.
https://t.co/aD60nLsFEI
After months of building, testing, and refining, Just Copy is finally out.
A clipboard manager for the Mac, the way I think Apple should have made it.
It keeps everything you copy. Reach for the notch and it's all there.
$29.99 at launch (normally $49).
https://t.co/aD60nLsFEI
A lot of the work went into how it feels.
Light or dark. Solid or glass. Big cards or small. At the notch or above the Dock. No notch? It works the same.
It reads how your pointer moves, so the tray opens when you mean it to. Never by accident.
Been noticing this more and more:
AI gives talented people insane leverage when they work for themselves.
Put them inside a big company, and somehow they’re still stuck moving at company speed.
That’s why the best talent isn’t just switching companies anymore.
They’re leaving them.
@WhatsApp what in the AI slop is this. 2 close buttons when searching in WhatsApp. The inner one doesn’t even work. Same on your Mac OS app. Even WhatsApp can’t run away from the slop. We are dead
I think AI is exposing something a lot of people don’t want to admit:
Most people who are “bad at AI” aren’t bad at prompting.
They’re bad at explaining what they want.
Give two people the exact same model.
One produces something incredible.
The other produces generic AI slop and concludes that the model sucks.
The difference usually isn’t some secret prompt framework.
It’s clarity of thought.
A lot of people have spent their entire careers being able to say:
“Make it better.”
“Make it more premium.”
“This doesn’t feel right.”
“Make it more professional.”
Because there was always another human on the other side whose job was to interpret what they actually meant.
AI removes that layer.
Now you have to articulate your own thinking.
Why does this design feel cheap?
What specifically is wrong with this copy?
What does “premium” actually mean here?
Who is this for?
What are you trying to achieve?
What should change, and what absolutely shouldn’t?
The uncomfortable truth is that sometimes people can’t answer those questions.
And no amount of prompt engineering fixes that.
The people who are naturally good at using AI tend to have strong opinions, good taste and the ability to break vague ideas into specific decisions.
They don’t necessarily write better prompts.
They give better direction.
AI is making execution cheaper every month.
Which means knowing how to make something is becoming less of a bottleneck.
Knowing what should be made — and being able to explain why — is becoming the real skill.
Maybe AI isn’t making everyone smarter.
Maybe it’s just making the quality of our thinking much harder to hide.