@RepTeresaLF Yeah, we should be getting way more people out of the US for that kind of money. What are they doing, shipping them business class? They should go out the way they came in, stuffed in a trunk.
@Lord_Ultus@Nero The one good thing the Mormons had going for them was their high birth-rates and low divorce rates. Now they a bunch of retarded feminists like you, making the same stupid jokes about how their wives wear the pants in every priesthood meeting.
@Nero There's this story about how some guys built a submarine, and they couldn't light the interior, so God touched some rocks from behind a curtain, making them glow.
But the worst part is that the book of mormon makes God a utilitarian.
@venti_pelo@TheLaurenChen@elonmusk Your point is way off, as I clearly explained and as the study showed. Having less money makes men very slightly less likely to have children. Having more money makes women a lot less likely to have children. The way to increase birthrates is to make women poorer.
@Cernovich Real estate is NOT an investment when the population is declining. Lots of property in Japan is incredibly cheap because of their demographic collapse. US real estate is being propped up by immigration and shenanigans.
@venti_pelo@TheLaurenChen@elonmusk Poorer people have more babies. I agree we're not as rich as baby boomers, but we're still richer than 99.99% of our ancestors who had way more children. As the study shows, women have more babies when they are poorer.
@asvldr@TheLaurenChen@elonmusk Taking birth control is a matter of female choice. In my experience, so is condom use. Abortion is legal and so is stealing sperm. Women have maximal agency over when babies get born. Contraception is a problem only insofar as women choose to use it.