Big Food is quietly adding BUG & INSECT PROTEIN FLOUR to your everyday groceries — WITHOUT your knowledge or consent.
PepsiCo is actively testing cricket proteins in Cheetos and Quaker Granola Oats… and now experimenting with WORMS as a protein source for drinks, snacks, and more. At least six major companies are grinding insects into flour for foods, beverages, confectionaries, butters, oils, and seasonings.
No labeling. No warning. You’ll never know it’s in there.
ADM (Archer Daniels Midland) is already producing insect-based foods in Illinois. The industry is exploding — projected to hit $4.6 BILLION in sales and 1.4 MILLION TONS of insect protein by 2027.
Here’s the dirty secret they don’t want you to see:
- Crickets are being hyped as “60% protein” — but independent testing shows only ~13%.
- Cleveland Clinic warns 30% of cricket farms carry parasites that transmit disease to humans.
- The chitin (exoskeleton) they call “digestible fiber”? NIH admits they don’t even know how the human body processes it.
This isn’t about “saving the planet.”
This is a hidden agenda to rewrite what we eat — sneaking it into your food supply without a single vote or label.
Demand full transparency.
Boycott anything that touches this.
Your plate, your choice.
Makerfield by election results. Three candidates get exactly the same number of votes. The odds of this happening can be in the region of 10,000 to 1. @RupertLowe10 this is what election petition enquiries are for.
Imagine living in a country where you go straight to jail for a tweet, but get bail after being arrested for ‘allegedly’ throwing a 3 year old baby into a crocodile enclosure! The world is watching is disbelief!
They can’t. Make your own vpn:
1. SSH to a host with:
ssh user@host -D 8081
2. Point your browser proxy settings to localhost port 8081, and mark it as a SOCKS v5 proxy.
3. You now are proxying your browser traffic to where that host is, like a vpn.
🚨VPNs to be forced to collect digital id data🚨
UK Labour government is pushing draconian digital control under the guise of “child safety.”
The House of Lords amendment now forces VPN providers to implement highly effective age assurance (ID checks, biometrics, etc.) to block under-18s from using consumer VPNs.
This comes right as they announce a full social media ban for under-16s — with further “VPN restrictions” due in July.
They’re turning privacy tools into surveillance gateways.
Digital ID-style verification creeping in everywhere.
This isn’t protection. It’s overreach.
Proof:
• Lords amendment text: https://t.co/qhZ0z3nKxR
• Lords vote & details: https://t.co/3Hv4zDaeob
• Liz Kendall on July VPN update + social media ban: https://t.co/4r67cC24JO
Wake up before it’s too late.
I just wanted to wish this amazing woman Rebecca Shepherd all the luck in the world for tomorrow , she has been amazing walking door to door for Restore Britain in the Makerfield by election tomorrow , they couldn't have chosen a better grass roots hard working down to earth choice to run for them ! I think people will choose honesty and integrity over career seeking empty promises every time and she has all of that to offer !! We are behind you all the way Rebecca !
Police “Twist” handcuffs to cause more Pain to 17 year old boy 😳👮♀️😡
Sheffield 🏴
The 17 year old boy who hit his head on a metal bollard after being “violently” arrested is on the ground explaining he is in a lot of Pain after hitting his head…an officer “Twists” his handcuffs to cause more pain and tells him to “relax” this is police brutality 😡
#police @TRobinsonNewEra@syptweet
When You Can't Beat Reform, Change The Rules. Labour Just Did.
There is a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything. When those in power begin adjusting the rules of the game to determine its outcome, the game is no longer democracy. It is managed succession. That line was crossed again on Tuesday night.
Two days before the Makerfield by-election, Labour rushed a change to the mayoral voting system through the House of Lords. Regional mayors will now be elected using the supplementary vote system rather than first past the post. The change applies immediately. It will govern whoever replaces Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester if he wins on Thursday and stands down.
The government's defence is that it is simply restoring the system used before Boris Johnson changed it in 2021. That argument requires the public to believe that a change Labour could have introduced at any point in two years of government became urgent on Tuesday evening, forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect.
Lord Hayward, a Conservative peer and experienced pollster, was precise in the Lords. There is no other justification for the haste, he said, other than that it solves the Labour Party's problems and prevents Reform winning a mayoralty. Not clumsy. Not rushed. Designed.
The mechanics explain why. Under first past the post, Reform could win the Greater Manchester mayoralty on a plurality of votes in a fragmented field, precisely as it won all eight council wards in May's local elections with around fifty percent of the vote. Under the supplementary vote system, voters express a first and second preference. Lib Dem and Green voters, given a second preference, will direct those votes to Labour overwhelmingly. The change does not affect Thursday's by-election. It affects the mayoral contest that follows it, constructing an anti-Reform coalition from the second preferences of smaller parties that Reform itself cannot access.
Lord Jackson identified the wider implication. This is potentially a strategy for a progressive alliance being rolled out ahead of a general election, he said, with the aim of locking out the Conservatives and Reform from power. Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation. The supplementary vote is the local pilot for a national project. Pool second preferences, lock out the right, govern indefinitely on a minority of first preference votes.
This is not the first time. Earlier this year Labour delayed local elections after the Electoral Commission stated explicitly that the justification was not legitimate, that extending mandates damages public confidence and creates a conflict of interest by allowing those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. The Commission's objection was noted and ignored. Reform demolished Labour anyway.
Now the same instinct has been applied to a different mechanism. Not cancellation this time. Electoral system change, deployed with surgical precision forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect.
Governments confident in their mandate do not need to change the rules two days before the ballot. They face the electorate and take their chances. The timing of Tuesday night's Lords motion is not a coincidence. It is a confession.
The voters of Makerfield vote on Thursday. The question of who governs Greater Manchester after that, and under what rules, was settled in the Lords on Tuesday. Nobody voted for that.
"Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation."
"I have always made it clear that I support England and the English. The Act of Union [WAS] a strength, but Europe opened up old wounds with regional Governments which has been divisive." emphasis added GM
"I can assure you Restore Britain is what it appears to be and there is no hidden agenda."
This means that Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain are the closest to the aims and objectives in terms of restoring England. Therefore I support the election of Rebecca Shephard in Makersfield.
Having a share of sovereignty means that — just as the Crown itself cannot abstain from assent or dissent — you must not and cannot abstain from voting. This candidate’s party supports the restoration of England.
Live 8pm tonight.
https://t.co/Ei5YYU6XHN
🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨
They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!
Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!
They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.
The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.
If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.
🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!
The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.
Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.
1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.
2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.
3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.
4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.
💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.
They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.
📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).
🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.
🕵️♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.
💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.
Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.
Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.
FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.
So, what shall we do folks!?
New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.
Halsbury's Laws of England. Communists and Fascists purged from civil service. So why are the Fabians running the civil service? Why were 141 Fabians elected to parliament? Why are the count teams at elections in the RED WALL trained by common purpose?
LAWFUL REBELLION
YOUR RIGHT UNDER MAGNA CARTA
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint. Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people's Sovereignty.
This is how we solve our political woes and take our country back.
Only we can save ourselves.
Please repost.
This really worries me
A month ago in Wales I suffered a ruptured aneurysm in my abdomen. I lost over 2 units of blood
But the Welsh ambulance service refused to send an ambulance. I was still breathing so apparently didn't need one
I spent 7 hours lying on the ground in a car park. Every time I moved I threw up from the pain. The owners of the car park called 999 6x
One of the people there was a fireman. He couldn't believe that 999 treated each call as a separate incident and couldn't see the details or link to previous calls. He was frustrated because they could see I was seriously ill but you can't see internal bleeding and so there was no way to persuade 999 that it actually was an emergency
Eventually my husband arrived by taxi, journey of more than 3 hours from our home
He gave me my pain meds (the car park people were worried about liability and I was too ill to get them myself). This meant I was able to crawl into the car and he drove me to A&E
He got me into a wheelchair. We waited 75 minutes to see a doctor. I was shivering, heaped with blankets and threw up all over the floor
As soon as a doctor looked at me I was taken straight to resus. The next day I was transfered by blue light ambulance to another hospital, had a blood transfusion and spent 5 days on the high dependency unit
If my husband hadn't been able to come and look after me I have no idea how I would have survived. As it was I nearly didn't
I would not have been able to get myself to hospital nor would I have been able to log into some digital triage system
This scheme seems to assume if you're seriously ill you'll arrive by ambulance and if not you're well enough to navigate a digital portal
My experience suggests that's a dangerous assumption
A week later, back home in England I had another ruptured aneurysm. This time an ambulance came in 2 hours and again I was taken straight to resus
It wasn't the same because I had a recent diagnosis of a ruptured aneurysm so we could tell 999 I was almost certainly bleeding internally. But I was too ill to get myself down the stairs and out to the car. We still needed that ambulance and I still wouldn't have been able to fiddle around with an ipad
Proper triage REQUIRES an actual doctor to look at the patient. It takes a matter of minutes to differentiate between a life threatening emergency and not a life threatening emergency. That's not minutes to get a diagnosis but to know that the person is stable or not stable and if not that needs immediate attention
Seriously ill people can't do it themselves. It doesn't matter how smart or articulate they are normally. Or how tough. Expecting people to manage their own emergency care isn't what a modern health service should do
https://t.co/RMi7L44fUy
British Nationality Act 1948 . . . "British" Windrush 1948 - 1973 . . . Who was Delroy "The Night Stalker" Grant. Where did he come from (Jamaica) and how many elderly people men and women did he rape in South East London (up to 600)?
What is identity theft? What happens when a regime steals your identity? British v English? Soviet v Russian?
DEI is the only reason you see black and brown people in positions of media, authority etc.
Why do they flock to America and England? Why not Jamaica, Liberia in Africa or India?
Why did all this accelerate after WWII?
Message to Starmer and the police:
You have attacked those protesting.
There would have been no protests if our borders had been enforced.
That evil man would not have been in the country and a British citizen would not be in hospital with life threatening injuries.
The fault lies with government.
Do you want to know something interesting about the decision to remove Winston Churchill, Alan Turing and Jane Austen from bank notes?
Savanta, a market research company, was chosen to run a focus group.
The result of that focus group is that Churchill was “divisive”, Turing “an imperialist” and Austen “contentious and not representative”.
Yet that focus group had only 119 people in it.
And only one person called Turing “imperialist”. Someone who probably did not even know that he was not only instrumental in the Allies winning WW2 but was a gay man who was chemically castrated to “cure him”.
Turing was left fat, flabby and so unhappy that he carefully injected cyanide into an apple and ate it. He was found with half the apple by his side.
The Bank of England claims that the focus group was only part of its decision and it ran a broader public inquiry that favoured animals and flowers. Who did they ask? Primary school kids?