@bob_bob2131@zhaoweiasu@InvestsZoo4947 Yes there can be, depending on the editor and depending on the site or editing window. Off-target editing of RNA is another concern with certain base editors.
Base is still cleaner than regular Cas9, but Prime editors are on an entirely different level wrt off targets
@learnbiotech I will say though I think there are a number of examples out there in the last 1-2 yrs where this holds true for biotech. Would be interesting to see how generalizable it is though, particularly in this current sector downturn.
@learnbiotech This is kind of interesting, tbh. Thx for sharing. I wonder how broadly applicable it is today, and whether there were any confounding macro effects on the biotech sector specifically during the time that study was conducted (‘08-‘10).
@zhaoweiasu@2035Bio@RNAiAnalyst Yes that’s 100% correct. The template design of PE system makes off target or bystander edits farrrrrr less likely (essentially undetectable) than either BE or regular Cas9.
@Christo60653473 Yes, maybe should have added that to my original post, but I agree with you. If NSCLC data is good, I think they’re an absolute slam dunk for BO.
Still compelling as is though, imo. Even if no BO, I’m still long the stock as amtagvi rollout continues. Lots of room for growth
@Idvst8_Markets $VKTX on my BO list as well, although I think they have everything they need to succeed on their own (I guess same could technically be said for $IOVA)
Haven’t considered the others on your list as much aside from MDGL, but maybe I need to do a deeper dive!
Liking the price action for $IOVA and $CKPT today.
Still feel like $IOVA should be trading at double current SP.
$CKPT has been great to me. Cashed out original investment once I hit 100% return, now just letting house money ride into the pending cosi approval
Can I also just take a moment to say that the data from $NTLA always just looks so CLEAN?? From HAE to ATTR, I'm always left feeling truly impressed.
Not too many companies at this stage routinely publish in @NEJM whenever they have a data drop.
Previous estimates suggested 80% reduction in TTR levels required for tx benefit.
Consistent with previous data from $NTLA, newest ph1 release shows they are comfortably above that target at 90%, and the reduction happens FAST (<1 mo). From NEJM paper -->
#ATTR News: $NTLA announces positive new clinical data from the ongoing Phase 1 trial of nexiguran ziclumeran (nex-z) in patients with #ATTR amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy. Full details here: https://t.co/RP20Uz8GLR. Join us at 12 p.m. ET for a webcast discussing the data, as well as an update from the ongoing Phase 1 polyneuropathy cohort. https://t.co/hufx97doY8
#CRISPR #GeneEditing
wrt $NTLA ATTR data: during most recent earnings call, leadership stressed that when looking at the data released this morning, remember that these are patients with advanced, severe disease. That they are achieving these results in this patient population is really impressive.