Searching for answers on the origin of SARS2 and recently vindicated through information obtained by clever journalists, politicians, scientists, and netizens.
@SydMartin4@NickLongrich@Biorealism@mattwridley Right. For the CCP humanitarian concerns took a backseat to bioweapons research. Both sides were acutely aware of the dual-use purpose of GoF research. EHA funding provided a veneer of cooperation and a small window of transparency.
Asymmetric advantage was first prize.
In my lecture at @NIH, at the invitation of @NIHDirector_Jay, I explained why I changed my mind from thinking the lab leak theory of covid origins was unlikely to thinking it was almost certainly true.
Please watch and assess the evidence yourself.
https://t.co/7QBeGJT3yY
@Rebecca21951651 He must be doing a little night putting. The CCP leadership must cackle like hyenas every time they take advantage of our lax policies.
@JimFergusonUK US Navy Fleet Composite Squardon 5 and 6 were operating airborne and surface target drones in the early 1970's. I was on GITMO operating surface target drones (SEPTARS) when the Marine who served as the inspiration for "A Few Good Men" was killed. The evolution is long overdue.
@SenWarren Warren's tax records are available. She draws 100k in social security, and makes nearly a million a year, and doesn't give squat to charity.
She is a government leach. Warren is not your friend.
@VBruttel@mattwridley Perhaps, the S2 progenitor virus was already constructed prior to the DEFUSE proposal, and the breach occured after months of serial passage under BSL-2 conditions.
Perhaps they kept rolling the dice until they crapped out.
New Havens et al 2026 paper was invented out of thin air to explain away "pre-adaptation" of SARS CoV2 to humans by saying that adaptation is not needed at all.
It doesn't explain how a FCS would come about in bat reservoir since this feature is selected against in bat guts.
Does this look safe to you?
Reports of unrest in China 🇨🇳 are surfacing—but with heavy censorship, you’re only seeing a fraction of what’s really happening.
@virologyanon Layman's question: Is the depletion observed a product of personal design preference, or the most efficient means to an end?
Would other virologist's arrive at the same alterations given similar objectives?
@mattwridley Perhaps Baric chooses continued obfuscation because evidence would reveal parallel GoF experiments and post-outbreak collaboration with Fauci in coverup efforts.
Baric may be too unclean to come clean.