How should Democrats respond to anti-trans attacks? @KelleyJRobinson assesses @SherrodBrown's attempt.
ROBINSON: "The difference now to a few years ago is that Americans have seen literally thousands of anti-trans bills introduced across the country."
just one more industry-funded super PAC bro. i promise bro just one more super PAC and voters will love data centers. bro. forget the electric bills bro. just one more super PAC bro please we just need one more ad buy and we can build the data cent
NEW —
The super PAC for DATA CENTERS has arrived.
Meet Building the Future. The group is spending millions for Darline Graham in the homestretch, a preview of fights to come in 2028.
With @ELaserDavies:
https://t.co/91yNqjacJK
I thought this conversation was excellent, interesting, and well-facilitated. But wow did I find this exchange frustrating.
The dynamic at play here is that for-profit companies are racing to make a nearly-impossible-to-control technology that is smarter than we are at almost everything. If they get what they want, the best case scenario is it replaces humans at things and they get rich. The worst is that it kills people (and, likely, they get rich).
And maybe you don't think the "kill people" thing will happen. Cool. We should still have a democratic discussion about whether or not we want that before we get there, and if we do want it, what we want to use it for. And we should give us ourselves time to have that conversation.
It is also true that at the same time, AI is doing bad stuff right now. We should stop those bad things! And on top of those bad things, they are setting up an economic situation that leads to, through one door, job loss, and through the other, a massive market correction. We need to prepare for that reality.
But somehow a corner of the left has twisted itself into pretzels to say that “actually, regulating superintelligence plays into the hands of incumbents." But...the solution to incumbent-favoring regulation is to write better regulation, not to concede the question of what these systems become to the people building them.
Not regulating them plays into their hands! The whole thing is that their money (and concentration of power into their hands) comes when the technology is exponentially more powerful than it is right now.
This is just a different technology than we've dealt with before, and we need to act accordingly. Can’t we just...do all of this? What are we doing here?
https://t.co/WWtoU2MchG
So much happening in AI world. What should the govt do in response? Thanks to @SnehaRevanur@DKokotajlo@tylercowen@AlexBores & @Kabakab for hashing out answers with me in an NYT roundtable. https://t.co/RTULuW01RU
BREAKING: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging they misled consumers about the safety of the company’s artificial intelligence chatbot and failed to protect users from harm.
It is truly very funny watching the “big-AI-Republican-consultant” industrial complex try to retreat to “no one cares about AI” as their talking point when they just tried to spend $100 million+ on the issue this cycle and stuff like the this keeps happening anyway
Prime example of what @adamkovac talks about of bandwagon groups running ads on the #10 ranked issue in the hopes of stealing credit for a victory that had nothing to do with them.
Literally the playbook The Groups™️ run every cycle.