@J450NP13@TheEXECUTlONER_ I don’t think the line is the differentiator. It’s just whether or not he motions to second. I think there is a solid argument he does, even if it was brief and minor. The bigger issue is it appears the ump doesn’t even see the runner past the bag. He’s focused on the ball.
@fuckkjackk@itsdomyoutube No disrespect to Kupp, he had a great year, but he had insane volume. It’s what stafford/ram’s do. Look at Puka now. Look at woods/kupp the year before stafford got there.
@JoshReynolds24 Objectively, I don’t think you can compare doing this in the WBC to doing it regularly in a 162 game season. If dudes did this every time they hit a HR it would look stupid. I think the situation dictates how acceptable it is.
@HannahDCox Here is the issue: politicians don’t want problems solved. Terms are short and solved problems hurt job security. That is why issues that the masses would agree have a common sense middle ground never get there.
@Coach_JayGruden Help me understand here. He catches the ball in stride with both feet off the ground. When those two feet land is that the initial point of securing the catch or is that considered taking two steps. If the former, which is what I believe, kupp takes zero steps after.
@MistrunsLA@iam_johnw I wouldn’t even call these two steps. He jumped for the ball in stride and both feet landed. He didn’t take any steps after catching it.
@DaveKluge You can’t use an “if” scenario to justify what actually happened. The ball does not come loose bc of the ground. The ball was ripped from him by the defender after he was down by contact. Such a stupid arguement.