@shareb_io Early distribution is so key! We experience the same with @AlphaSophiaHQ and LinkedIn! The algorithms are very adaptable today, and decide very quickly what to scale and what to ignore.
Most people post on Instagram at the WRONG time.
That’s why their posts get:
low reach
low engagement
zero growth
Here’s the actual best time to post in 2026 (based on data + strategy) 👇
Most creators don’t fail because of bad content.
They fail because no one stops scrolling.
If your first 2 seconds don’t hook attention, your content dies.
Here are 20 Instagram hooks that actually work in 2026. 👇
@oleksiistrichyk@sergeynazarovx Why would there be? The whole business model is to drive everyone’s profit to zero at the expense of extracting maximum bidding volume
Avoiding things doesn’t erase them.
It turns them into debt.
That skipped convo, workout, or project?
It’s still waiting - with interest.
Be honest with yourself.
The bill always comes due.
Overraising and its Hidden Costs 🧵
Let's be honest — startup culture today has a massive obsession with fundraising. Founders are celebrated for closing huge investment rounds as if raising money alone guaranteed success. Let's be fucking clear: Most startups raise way more money than they actually need, only to pay a heavy price down the line. Excessive capital can trap founders, employees, and even friends-and-family investors in a vicious cycle of unrealistic expectations, brutal liquidation preferences, and diluted control. Overraising isn't the achievement many believe it is — it's often just kicking the can down the road, setting everyone involved up for painful realities later.
Alright, before you think I'm totally anti-VC, let's set something straight: some businesses simply can't survive or scale without substantial funding upfront. If you're trying to launch the next big hardware product, something seriously groundbreaking in biotech, or a business with powerful network effects — think Facebook, Uber, or Airbnb — you genuinely need a pile of cash early on. These types of startups are capital-intensive beasts: they require massive upfront investments for things like manufacturing, infrastructure, rapid scaling, or research. Without significant early capital, they risk being swallowed by competitors or never getting off the ground at all. In these scenarios, raising a ton of money isn't just strategic, it's a necessity. But let's be real — your startup most likely doesn't fall into this category.
Most startups fall into the trap of raising way more money than they genuinely need, believing more cash equals guaranteed success. But here's the harsh truth: excess funding often leads to reckless spending, bloated teams, and unsustainable growth expectations. Founders get pressured to hit unrealistic milestones to satisfy impatient investors, sacrificing their initial vision in the process. Worse yet, aggressive liquidation preferences mean founders and early employees often get screwed over if things don't go perfectly. Friends and family, who jumped in early, hoping to support a dream, are left holding the bag, their investments diluted into irrelevance. In short, the glamour of raising huge rounds quickly fades when reality hits — and everyone involved pays dearly. A decade of your life, 10 millions in value created, only for a founder to walk away with the downpayment to a condo. Fucking kills me man.
On the flip side, bootstrapping — or small seed rounds — might seem slow and unglamorous, but they offer a hell of a lot more freedom and sustainability. These companies are forced to be smarter and scrappier, carefully allocating their limited resources to what genuinely matters. Founders retain control, aren't beholden to impatient investors, and can keep their business aligned with their original vision. Sure, growth might be slower, but it's steady, profitable, and sustainable. Employees, founders, and early supporters all benefit from the increased stability and genuine alignment of incentives. Ultimately, this type of entrepreneurship is about building real fucking value — without a lot of the bullshit.
Most startups would be better off with a balanced, strategic mixed funding approach. Rather than rushing into massive rounds, founders should bootstrap initially, validate their ideas, build genuine value, and only later consider selectively raising capital — small, targeted rounds that accelerate proven growth without sacrificing control or integrity. This strategy combines the best of both worlds, offering founders flexibility, sustainability, and strategic growth. It protects employees, early investors, and founders alike from aggressive terms and unsustainable expectations, keeping everyone aligned for long-term success.
The bottom line? Overraising is an epidemic, fueled by vanity metrics and the misguided belief that bigger rounds equal bigger success. In reality, raising more money than needed usually leads to disaster—loss of founder freedom, employee disillusionment, and burned early investors. Fuck this shit. True entrepreneurial success isn't measured by how much you've raised but by how well you've created genuine, sustainable value for everyone involved.
“The only judge who has complete context on our lives, dies with us.
A reminder of the heavy weight we place on things that matter little.” — @AlexHormozi
@vtchakarova Let’s see :) I think the App Store is velocity driven (as opposed to total downloads), so the real test will be how it performs 3-4 weeks from now, when the initial news cycle has worn off
@Molson_Hart There is a massive political aspect to it as well. Basically any large scale project anywhere in Europe or the US immediately gathers large local opposition, delaying even the planning stage for decades.
The infrastructure projects happening in western hemisphere are child's play compared to what is happening in Southeast Asia.
We are being left behind.