Narrative is what determines what these people do or do not understand.
Many will not be convinced "at this point"of what really happened and how these companies were built. At least not now.
But the facts are there,and that is what makes the denial weak; its nature and causes stem either from a specific interest,selfdeception,or ignorance.
The Silicon Valley experience has shown that any company pioneering a completely new field inevitably faces setbacks that force it to truly prioritize the user first. OpenAI and Anthropic are bound to reach this stage, and there will be greater transparency regarding what’s really happening with training models and so on.
But the key question is: Will these companies ever reach the level of what open source offers us? I don’t think soand this is the profit-driven model at play here, regardless of the practical complexities.
Open source has always been a valuable resource for humanity, and i hope it continues to truly evolve.
Coding only
Although Claude’s models excel at repetition and extended reasoning in mathematics and biology, the consistent rejection of requests containing biological or cybernetic questions or prompts even if innocent is very frustrating.
Therefore, I believe that the full potential of Claude’s models is currently limited to a select few.
@hqmank@Boris Yes.. in Claude code Claude make the same mistake 4 times! I have a good context engineering memory agent m.d etc.. still he do mistakes make me feel I'm talking with gpt 3.5.
Something not right about Claude models even via api.
@RepJoeWilson I don't think it's a good idea to jump to conclusions, Mr. Representative.
We've grown accustomed to the traditional visit by an Iraqi prime minister every session,
but the situation in Iraq has become very tense and no longer allows for any internal maneuvering.
Time will tell.