let freedom ring 🇺🇸

[Cory Dobbin @CoryOnBrand]

This just gets crazier by the second. @Meta and @finkd need to address this ASAP. This is the flock-fueled future everyone is afraid of and corporations keep telling everyone it's fine. Prove it.

@ kontheinside on IG

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨WOW!!!

A foster mom caring for THREE special-needs kids couldn't afford the parts to fix her van's broken AC.

So a total stranger bought the parts himself, fixed it for free, and had it running before she got there.

When she reached in and felt cold air for the first time… she broke down crying. ❤️

The strangers name is Michael Kuba.

And that story? It's just one of thousands.

About 11 years ago, Michael's own van AC died and the car shop quoted him almost $4,000.

He had 3 little kids crying in the back seat in the Arizona heat… and no way to pay it.

So he did the only thing he could do.

He bought some tools. Watched YouTube. And through pure trial and error, he taught himself to fix it.

Then he had a thought: how many other families are stuck in this exact spot?

That was the birth of The Junkie Garage, a nonprofit in Glendale, Arizona.

The rules are almost unbelievable.

No income checks.
No paperwork.
No questions about your money or your past.

You bring the parts. Y
ou donate whatever you can afford for the labor.

That's it.

"I don't ask you for your income. I don't ask you who you are, where you came from, or anything like that. I just wanna help people get their cars working right."

An AC job that runs $2,000 to $4,000 at a normal shop? His average customer pays less than $300, donations included.

...but Michael doesn't do it alone.

His son Matthew has been right there beside him, wrench in hand, since he was EIGHT years old.

He's a teenager now, and he's still there every week, fixing cars for strangers in his community.

"It's an amazing bonding experience, and it gives me an opportunity most kids don't get."

A dad teaching his boy how to fix an alternator… and how to be a man.

Michael puts it like this:

"You haven't lived until you've done something for someone that can never repay you."

He's got dreams of a bigger shop, more volunteers, more cars, more families kept on the road to work and school and church.

"If you have the ability to help people, just do it."

GOD BLESS Michael and Matthew Kuba. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@VinnysCorner1 Mike Schmidt!

[Joe Dan Gorman @JoeDanMedia]

POLL:
Senate Recess (scheduled for Aug 10 - Sept 14) actually begins this Friday.

Your prediction...
what the Senate will do?

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@libsoftiktok Wonder how he feels about that.

[Byl Holte @SirBylHolte]

WHY I STOPPED PLAYING THE POLITICS GAME:

We had a president with dementia for 4 years - and nobody called for the 25th Amendment.

We had a governor and a congresswoman help Somalia scam up to $19 billion dollars - and nothing happened to them.

We had Fauci kill millions with his weaponized covid virus - and he’s still in hearings refusing to answer questions.

ITS TOO MUCH!

Because if everything is a crisis that nobody will address…

That means none of it is real.

And my life is too good to waste time fighting over CRAP.

Anyone else fed up with the noise?

[Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 @Kristof_Poland]

The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment – the real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire

The French Enlightenment and the Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment happened simultaneously, in the same century, reading the same books, arguing about the same questions. They reached completely opposite conclusions. One produced the Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution. The other produced the guillotine. This is the most important civilizational fork in modern history.

1. The French Enlightenment begins with the assumption that human beings can be improved by reason – that if you strip away the corrupting institutions of Church, tradition, and inherited authority, the natural goodness underneath will organize itself into a just society. This sounds like progress. It is a fantasy with a body count. Every attempt to implement it has required, at some point, a Committee of Public Safety to handle the people who turned out not to be naturally good enough.

2. The Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment begins with the opposite assumption: human beings are what they are, not what they could be if properly enlightened. Hume grounds morality in human nature as it actually operates – sympathy, habit, sentiment, the slow accumulation of social trust. Smith shows that self-interest, properly channeled, produces collective benefit without a planner. Neither man is building a utopia. Both are building with the actual material available.

3. Burke is the direct refutation, written in real time. He published Reflections on the Revolution in France in 1790 – before the Terror, predicting it precisely – because he understood that institutions are not obstacles to human flourishing, they are its precondition. They contain accumulated wisdom — the knowledge of the dead — that cannot be recovered once destroyed. Pull society apart to improve it and you don’t get the General Will. You get Robespierre.

4. The American founders read Burke, Hume, Smith, and Montesquieu – the Frenchman who looked at England and understood what France was missing. They built a system that takes human nature as given — self-interested, power-hungry, tribal — and constructs institutions to contain those tendencies rather than assume they disappear once the right people are in charge. Checks and balances are not a design flaw. They are what you build when you don’t believe in philosopher-kings.

5. 1776 versus 1789. Same Enlightenment, same century, same vocabulary of liberty and reason. One produces a constitutional republic that has survived two and a half centuries of stress, civil war, and upheaval. The other produces, in sequence: the Terror, Napoleon, 1848, the Commune, and eventually — via Marx, who was a Frenchman in spirit if not in birth — the entire catastrophe of the twentieth century. The difference was not intelligence or intention. It was the starting assumption about human nature. Get that wrong and everything that follows is wrong with it.

6. The guillotine is not the Revolution’s failure. It is its logical conclusion. If man is naturally good and the system is corrupt, then whoever seizes the system in the name of natural goodness is licensed to do anything. The General Will cannot be wrong. Those who resist it are not opponents – they are enemies of nature itself.

7. The real antidote to Rousseau and Voltaire was never a better French philosopher. It was a different civilizational tradition – one that builds with human beings as they are; that treats inherited institutions as repositories of wisdom rather than obstacles to progress; that distributes power rather than concentrating it in whoever currently claims to know the General Will. That tradition was built in Edinburgh, London, and Philadelphia. It is currently under sustained assault — from exactly the same ideas, in exactly the same form, with exactly the same confidence — that Burke watched demolish France in 1789. He was right then. He is right now.

[Restricted Daily @RestrictedDaily]

Two hundred and fifty years ago, a remarkable idea changed the course of history. Ordinary men and women, armed with little more than faith, conviction, and an unbreakable desire to be free, stood against the most powerful empire on earth. They believed liberty was not granted by government, but given by God, and that belief gave birth to the greatest nation the world has ever known.

The Declaration of Independence was more than ink on parchment. It was a promise that future generations would have the opportunity to dream bigger, work harder, worship freely, speak openly, and determine their own destiny. Countless Americans have defended that promise with their lives, ensuring the torch of freedom was never extinguished.

For 250 years, America has endured wars, economic hardship, division, triumph, innovation, and unimaginable challenges. Yet through every generation, one truth has remained constant: when Americans stand together, there is no obstacle too great and no dream too impossible. Our greatest strength has never been our wealth or our military alone—it has always been the character, courage, and resilience of the American people.

From farmers and factory workers to soldiers, first responders, entrepreneurs, teachers, truck drivers, and parents, millions of ordinary citizens have built an extraordinary nation. Every generation has added another chapter to America’s story while protecting the freedoms handed down by those who came before them.

Today, millions of Americans believe President Trump is carrying that same torch. They see him fighting to put America first, protect our borders, defend our Constitution, strengthen our economy, honor our military and law enforcement, and remind the world that the United States will never apologize for loving its own country.

Whether history ultimately agrees or disagrees with that view, one thing is certain: the American story is still being written. The responsibility to preserve freedom has now passed to our generation, just as it did to every generation before us.

Happy 250th Birthday, America.

May God continue to bless this nation, protect those who defend her, and keep the flame of liberty burning for the next 250 years. 🇺🇸

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@Mimiiben1 5

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@ProfBZZZ It definitely starts in k-12. They haven't had textbooks in 20 years! They don't even know how to read them. Everything is given in snippets, and if it's not a video, they complain.

[Melissa Tate @TheRightMelissa]

Exactly!. All the whiners crying because Trump hasn’t reversed 100 years of globalist leftist rule in 1 year. 🙄

Ungrateful spoiled brats! Does that mean Trump is perfect? Far from it but we are 1000 times better off than we were a little over a year ago with wide open borders people pouring by the millions. Now down to zero crossings.
Political Prisoners released..
& yes people want to see prosecutions against Dems come faster but they don’t understand that the American system is designed to make it hard for a President to LEGALLY just round up & arrest political opponents. It is a long & methodical process that is very decentralized. With corrupt judges & deep state still imbedded, it is not that easy.

Unless you want Trump to use illegal shady tactics the left used on him..? But then we become the evil we purport to fight.

You can put pressure on Trump to act faster but this business of attacking him like I have seen on the right is utter lunacy because you are working to bring Dems back who are going to crush us all 10 times worse if we lose the house & senate & Trump is impeached, Elon thrown in Jail & then you won’t be able to cry about Trump sucks on X anymore!

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@hw_floyd @LauraLoomer Re

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@pudgenet My husband met him when he used to race cigarette boats. Said he was polite, down-to-earth, just an overall nice guy. Big contrast to another famous person he met at same venue.

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@roanoke_gal @NielsHoven Our schools did away with the general classes and wanted homogeneous grouping. We fought to keep the honors classes. Now, there's college prep and honors. CP is the new general class, and honors is the basic CP. Lowering the standards for all.

[The White Cock ™ @CluckTheLeft]

The greatest tragedy is Charlie being taken from his family for nothing more than standing for what he believed. Another is seeing someone so young so poisoned by lies that they threw their life away too. That poison is pumped daily by Democrat leaders, their media mouthpieces, and a trans activism movement that’s becoming increasingly violent while being excused and swept under the rug. This country has to return to God, truth, accountability, and the values that it was founded on.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

The Tale of the Naughty Policeman

Once upon a time, in the Kingdom of Fairford, there was a policeman named Inspector Block.

Inspector Block wore a shiny badge and carried a big book of rules. Everyone in the Kingdom was told that his duty was to uphold those rules without fear or favour.

But Inspector Block had developed a habit.

Whenever ordinary villagers brought him troubling reports about theft, dishonesty, or even great abuses by powerful men, Inspector Block frowned, slammed the cover of his rulebook shut and said:

“That is not a matter we will investigate.”

He never explained why. Instead, he scribbled a few secret words in his private notebook, locked it in a drawer and scolded the villagers:

“Your complaint is vexatious. You must not ask again.”

At first, people were puzzled. Then they were disappointed. And soon, they were furious.

The farmers saw their harvest stolen, yet Block shrugged.

The merchants saw fraud in the market, yet Block refused to act.

The teachers saw their children cheated, yet Block slammed his drawer shut.

The villagers whispered to one another: “Inspector Block is not guarding the law. He is guarding the powerful.”

Word spread across the Kingdom. Soon, other towns came forward, saying they too had their own Inspector Block - different names, same tricks.

The people began to watch more closely. They compared Block’s words with the very rulebook he pretended to uphold. And they noticed something important: it was Inspector Block himself who was breaking the rules.

Inspector Block thought he was clever, hiding behind silence and secrecy. But naughty policemen never escape scrutiny in the end.

For every locked drawer, there is a key.

For every scribbled note, there is a light to read it.

For every evasion, there is a reckoning.

And when that reckoning comes, the people will remember not just the rules that were broken, but also, who broke them.

The Moral

A policeman who forgets his oath betrays not just the people, but the law itself. The uniform cannot hide it. The locked drawer cannot protect it. The truth always comes out - and it is the naughty policeman himself who must answer in the end.

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@DeAngelisCorey Because some on the right believe it's a false flag, not because it is a false flag.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello ABC News,

According to your article, one guy made two angry calls to Utah Democrats. And some mean emails were received. And they're "intimidated."

If anything, this is proof that Democrats really do hold a sacroscant status in society. I've been in contact with multiple Republican politicians who suffer much, much worse than one man's voice messages; they just deem it such a regular occurrence that they don't send out a press release.

This act of pretending you're the endangered ones is exactly the trick we are seeing through now. You don't address our outrage, you don't reflect, you don't even try to meet people where they are and say "hey, sorry, you're not an existential threat."

You just turn our outrage over your celebration of Charlie Kirk's assassination into a pity party for yourselves. You cannot help but flip the script.

You don't get it. You don't get that your mask is off. We see through you now. That's why you have no choice but to keep doubling down on stupid stories like these in hopes of re-seizing the narrative that conservatives need to be silenced quickly.

Go away in shame.

[let freedom ring 🇺🇸 @Rrobin221]

@ChrisMartzWX Sussex county, Delaware

[L.H. Grey 0G Daddy @Grey_0G]

Oh, look, it's Chris Murphy, the self-appointed guardian of free speech, clutching his pearls over the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show." Let me break this down for you, you sanctimonious, pearl-clutching, virtue-signaling cunt, with the precision of a surgeon wielding a chainsaw.

First off, let's address your idiotic premise that Colbert's cancellation is some kind of "censorship state" orchestrated by Donald Trump. You, sir, are a fucking moron. The show was canceled because it was hemorrhaging money like a stuck pig...$40 million a year, to be exact. That's not censorship; that's basic fucking economics. CBS isn't a charity; it's a business, and even they got tired of propping up Colbert's unfunny, overpaid ass while he spewed the same tired, predictable, left-wing drivel night after night.

You want to talk about censorship? Where the fuck were you when Tucker Carlson got canned from Fox News? Oh, that's right, you were silent because it didn't fit your narrative. Hypocrite much? Tucker didn't cry about it; he pivoted, adapted, and stayed relevant. Colbert, on the other hand, ran his show into the ground, choosing agenda over truth, and now the market has spoken. That's not censorship; that's accountability, you dense motherfucker.

And let's not forget the irony of your outrage. Colbert's show wasn't even that good. His political material was bog-standard anti-Trump stuff, perfectly well-written but comedically indistinguishable from a thousand other late-night hacks. He watered himself down, became generic, and still managed to be the most popular host only because the bar was set so fucking low. Trump doesn't like him? Trump doesn't like a lot of people, but that doesn't mean they're being censored. It means they're irrelevant.

Your claim that this is part of a larger pattern is laughable. Paramount settled a lawsuit with Trump over a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris, a settlement that many legal experts called frivolous and potentially seeking favor for a merger approval. But guess what? The settlement didn't include an apology or admission of wrongdoing from CBS. So, where's the censorship? Where's the suppression? It's not there, you delusional fuckwit. It's a business decision, plain and simple.

And let's talk about the timing, shall we? You think it's suspicious that Colbert's show was canceled three days after he criticized the settlement? Please. That's coincidence, not conspiracy. The decision to cancel was likely made months ago, based on the show's declining ratings and financial losses. You're seeing patterns where none exist because you're so fucking desperate to paint Trump as the boogeyman.

The test of a free society isn't whether comedians can make fun of the country's leader without repercussions. It's whether they can do it without being subsidized by a network losing $40 million a year. Colbert didn't get thrown off the air because he wasn't doing well; he got thrown off because he wasn't funny, and no one was watching. He was the highest-rated show on TV in late night only because the competition was even worse. That's not a badge of honor; that's a fucking indictment.

So, Chris Murphy, take your melodramatic, hyperbolic bullshit and shove it up your ass. This isn't censorship; it's capitalism. Colbert's show died because it sucked, not because of some shadowy Trumpian plot. You're not defending free speech; you're defending a failed product. And the fact that you're this upset about it only makes it sweeter that Colbert was canceled. Good fucking riddance to bad rubbish. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go laugh at the absurdity of your tweet.