Deaths in the US so far in 2026, by cause:
Drowning: approximately 1000 (22 kids in Texas alone)
Mushroom poisoning: 4
Rattlesnake: 3
Lightning: 2
Marathon: 1
Measles: 0
And, oh yeah, overdose: approximately 30000
Let's try to scare people some MORE about measles, huh?
This is biblical.
A woman in her eighties. Ten years into Alzheimer's. Hadn't spoken a full sentence in five years.
Takes one, 5 gram dose of psilocybin.
She slept 19 hours and woke up and spoke for hours about her life, recognized family and held real conversations. She regained bladder control after five years, walked on her own. and dressed herself. Gains held for weeks.
Men function on a raw meritocracy.
The best hunter gets the spear, or everyone starves.
Women function on coercive redistribution.
They use force to make sure their younger and weaker children get food.
This is why when women gain political power, you get socialism/communism.
Helen Andrews drops a massive truth bomb on the collapse of modern institutions.
She confirms that as organizations became demographically female they abandoned objective rules and justice for emotional consensus.
The establishment traded competence for blind compliance.
Let's not leave out sushi, tuna, and raw milk. But go ahead and inject animal dna, toxic metals, lipid nanoparticles, cow blood, sv40 fragments, plasmid, and whatever the heck else.
If the pertussis vaccine doesn’t stop infection or transmission of whooping cough @SenatorAntic asked ATAGI why, then, are we forcing grandparents to have the vaccine before they can see their newly born grandchildren?
@ChildrensHD@AaronSiriSG
This is nothing short of a miracle.
Dr John Campbell breaks down the study of an 83yr old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had metastasised to the liver, spine and bones.
Usually a death sentence.
She took a daily dose of 222mg of FenBen for 8 months. Which normalised her liver enzymes. The tumor marker dropped from 316 to 36.
There was an absence of any abnormal metabolic activity indicative of cancer. Please like, share, and follow my page. Information like this need to be heard and seen by everyone.
My doctor put me on a statin after my heart attack at 52.
I trusted him. I took the pill. I never asked a question.
Then I found this study. 60 clinical trials. 323,950 people. Every cholesterol lowering drug ever made. Statins. PCSK9 inhibitors. Ezetimibe.
They measured how much each drug lowered LDL cholesterol. Then they measured whether people lived or died.
The line is flat.
It did not matter if they lowered LDL by 10% or by 70%. The death rate did not change. In some trials people died more.
323,950 people. Near zero benefit. Published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 2023.
Nobody showed me this chart. Not my cardiologist. Not my pharmacist. Not the drug rep who visited my doctors office every month.
I had to find it myself. After the heart attack.
Mebendazole and ivermectin should be over-the-counter. Dirt cheap and available to everyone.
Dr. John Campbell SHOCKED after ivermectin cancer study: We could be CURING cancer—with ivermectin and mebendazole.
Doctor: "Your LDL is elevated. I'd like to start you on a statin."
Patient: "What are the side effects?"
Doctor: "Some patients get muscle pain. Fatigue. Occasionally elevated blood sugar. Small cognitive effect in a subset."
Patient: "So: muscle damage, fatigue, diabetes risk, memory problems."
Doctor: "They're rare."
Patient: "But they're the list you just gave me."
Doctor: "The benefits outweigh the risks."
Patient: "By how much? Statins reduce heart attack risk by what percentage?"
Doctor: "Around 25 to 35 percent."
Patient: "Relative risk. What's the absolute reduction?"
Doctor: "..."
Patient: "If my baseline risk is 4% over ten years, a third reduction takes me to 2.7%."
Doctor: "The relative reduction is significant."
Patient: "So I take a daily pill with those side effects for ten years to cut my absolute risk by 1.3 percentage points."
Doctor: "When you frame it like that..."
Patient: "How should I frame it?"
Doctor: "I have some literature..."
Patient: "Does it list who funded the trials?"
Doctor: "..."
Patient: "I'll ask at the desk on my way out."
Elon, the dose issue is larger than Covid vaccine. We've gone from 3 injections in 1986 by first birthday to 29 injections, and during same period from under 10% to over 40% of children having a chronic health issue, most related to immune system dysregulation. Infants, unlike adults getting Covid vaccine, can't speak. But the studies comparing children w/ no vaccines to children receiving one or more reflect that the vaccinated have multiple times the rate of these conditions.
Full citations and support in Chapter 11 of Vaccines, Amen.
😱🤯 OH, NOT AGAIN! — Italian study just dropped:
People who got at least one COVID shot are:
☑️34% more likely to get colorectal cancer
☑️54% more likely breast cancer, and ☑️62% more likely bladder cancer vs. the unvaccinated?!
This is INSANE!!
Why is nobody screaming about this?! 🚨💥
#VaccineTruth #CancerRisk
Women will say shit like this and then wonder why the entire planet and every major religion has imposed strict social restrictions on their sovereignty since the dawn of time in every place humans have ever lived
Reminder that children who do not receive one or more vaccines due to their parent’s convictions are not locked away in an attic. They are going to church, participating in sports leagues, enrolled in ballet class, are part of large homeschool meetups, etc. They are just denied, in a few states, an in-school education. In this instance, let’s be more like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc., that have no school mandates. Persuade parents on the merits and, if you can’t, that is called informed consent. They were informed and didn't consent; mandating over their objection is immoral and illiberal.
Who is more likely to spread the pertussis bacterium (aka, whooping cough)—those vaccinated or those unvaccinated? The reality (see FDA, industry, and pharma scientists sources below) is that it is the vaccinated.
Why? Two reasons.
First, those vaccinated are less likely to have symptoms if infected with the pertussis bacterium but the bacterium still multiplies in their nasopharynx and they then unknowingly spreading it to others (instead of showing symptoms and knowing to isolate). Not science fiction—the hard cold facts as detailed below.
Second, and this makes the reality even worse, because after an unvaccinated person has been infected with pertussis (and is more likely to have symptoms and stay in bed) that person won’t get infected again for at least many years – but the vaccinated individual can become infected over, and over, and over again with the pertussis bacterium because of the defective immunity this vaccine generates.
But don’t worry, legacy media, no doubt won’t let the facts stand in the way of their hyperbolic reporting. They will blindly, like religious adherents, seek to blame, persecute, and shame those who do not inject this product instead of facing the reality: those vaccinated are more likely to spread this pathogen.
If you don’t agree with the foregoing, take it up with the FDA, industry scientists, infectious diseases societies, and the hard cold data and science:
- As the FDA explained in 2024: “aP [acellular pertussis] containing vaccines induce helper T cells (TH2) memory and neutralizing antibody responses that effectively prevent symptomatic disease but fail to prevent colonization and carriage.” https://t.co/edFIT8uztw
- As those considered the world's leading pertussis vaccine experts, pharma consultants, and infectious disease societies explained in a consensus paper on pertussis vaccine in 2019: “Natural infection evokes both mucosal and systemic immune responses, while aPVs [acellular pertussis vaccines] induce only a systemic immune response. … Mucosal immunity is essential to prevent colonization and transmission of B. pertussis organisms. Consequently, preventive measures such as aPVs that do not induce a valid mucosal response can prevent disease but cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” https://t.co/nlLg6dr30h They also explained that: “Lack of mucosal immune responses after aPV administration favor infection, persistent colonization, and transmission of the pathogen.”
- https://t.co/oYIE4wacTu (“That vaccination does not prevent B. pertussis infection in humans, nor the circulation of the organism in human populations in any important manner, comes from the observation that the inter-epidemic intervals have not changed in a major way since the implementation of mass vaccination.”); https://t.co/aleEKXMQL2 (“Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”).
For a detailed discussion with many more citations and irrefutable evidence, see Chapter 9 of Vaccines, Amen.
The quantum property of aluminum: The high positive charge +3 helps it bind to tissues and cross barriers (like the blood-brain barrier), while the reflective property turns it into a biophoton disruptor. We need biophotons (UPE) to do work all over the body and especially brain, heart, nervous system--aerobic cells with mitochondria produce them--it means life and good cell communication. Aluminum is uniquely dangerous because it turns the cell’s own light signals against itself — like putting mirrors inside a laser cavity and destroying the beam. This is what Dr Jack is talking about. It goes beyond what I've been talking about with Al+3 and adds to the discussion. Aluminum is one of the best ways to win a debate with a pro vax. It is highly reactive and destructive from a molecular view down to a quantum one.