@matsonj@merm_bot I haven't gotten to the dbt part of mds in a box so maybe this will be less of an issue then too. fwiw harlequin is amazing for how lightweight and simple it is!
@matsonj@merm_bot Project has db local and on Motherduck. MD is great, feels like snowflake. I was looking for something to dev queries locally, when I saw this post about DBeaver I thought it might be better suited for me, just curious since you moved most sql to harlequin and if that is enough
@matsonj@merm_bot new user of harelquin (h/t you). I'm setting up a lot of DuckDB stuff for fun. I found harlequin really helpful for a lot of the DE to easily explore DB/schemas, but not as great for adv interactive sql dev. Is there limits to what you use harlequin for? or is this a skill issue
@JosiahParry I did a similar presentation to my python team, with “R did it first” sprinkled in everywhere. This was just a lunch & learn, but I think it was the first open source in early 1990’s. S being the first data frame implementation
@JosiahParry @tiddlydump When you say duckdb + dplyr, does that mean you use SQL strings or files with duck db, collecting into R dataframe, and then using dplyr?
I’m also trying to understand duckplyr vs dbplyr and use cases
@cjsewall9@TheSeaMouse@alexkyllo My work is strictly python/jupyter. I use quarto to leverage packages we already have built in python (like data connects), convert data to @ApacheArrow and then do initial work in R. Convert any results back to python.