Do you love words? Are you poetic, artistic, creative, or good at making art of your words?
https://t.co/9GGQSvhYlN
is a definition-smithing contest with cash prizes upto $500 (record bounty)
Create for others & be happy:
Click a word you like
DEFINE
Most votes💡wins
@LisaNEdwards@orangegatewayx The @orangegatewayx already has BSV listed; in fact, it’s the denominator to all the cryptocurrency pairs it offers. I’m sure they would appreciate your trading business/liquidity— especially if you buy and sell BSV for any reason. It’s a rare fair exchange
@CsTominaga@RamG101_777@ComedyLond Sounds a bit like the OP-PUSH-TX methodology.
Looking forward to it— we could certainly use something like that. As is typical, we will want to be able to put a couple gigabytes of unique data on them— call it “original artwork” but more like published micro-information.
In academia, a paper cannot pass through the pearly gates of peer review without the author confessing who paid for the wine, the dinner, and the indignation. Funding disclosures exist because bias, like cheap perfume, lingers in the air long after the speech has ended.
Yet politicians — those wandering salesmen of conviction — are permitted to legislate, regulate, moralise, and bankrupt nations without so much as a sponsor label stitched to their lapel.
Every speech should come with a disclosure statement.
This taxation bill brought to you by:
Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, and three gentlemen from Davos who insist they are “philanthropists.”
This environmental policy sponsored by:
The same corporations flying private jets to climate conferences while lecturing farmers about cows.
This war approved with generous support from:
Defence contractors who become wealthier every time peace is delayed another quarter.
One cannot demand transparency from scientists while allowing politicians to masquerade as virginal thinkers descending from Olympus untouched by money. A politician without disclosed sponsors is merely an advertisement pretending to be philosophy.
At the very least, Parliament should resemble Formula One. The jackets would finally be honest.
WORD OF THE DAY: ostensibly
How do you like this picture as help to define it?
Seek it here
https://t.co/s1wZtJZ1qL
for just 1 penny and no annoying ads!
Don't forget to vote 💡
@PeterSchiff@TFTC21 Until the gold-holding counterparty decides not to pay off your gold tokens with gold.
There’s a reason humans used silver coins and other metals— it’s the actual commodity and not a promise.
@PeterSchiff@TFTC21 You’re missing the fundamental thing bitcoin accomplishes— it commoditizes information and that’s a MUCH more logical money than gold— whether tokenized digitally or used as coins.
It may not be possible to make a better money than commoditized information containers.
BSV
@CalvinAyre “yellow” newspapers
“vulgar” Nickelodeon “hysteria”
radio “home invasion”
TV “boob-tube”
that damn rock and roll music
Dirty Dancing
Video Game brain rot
Social Media
…
Next!
@thecoastguy@vrev20935 Every podcast is like an advertisement for @SLictionary:
https://t.co/L8irUWKzmL
What if advertisements could add to the content? What if a podcaster could finance his interviews via defining the key words used in the podcast & making money from the traffic it generates?
Sometimes I have to remind myself of how insane the small blockers were.
Here's Greg Maxwell of Blockstream in dec 2017 celebrating with "champaign" that the blocks were full, fees & backlogs skyrocketing and adoption absolutely crashing and burning.
According to him and Adam Back it was of course spam, or "contrieved traffic". 7 tps for a world currency was more than enough.
During this Greg used all the tricks that got him banned from Wikipedia to censor and block discussion on r/bitcoin and related forums. He also had a puppet account agreeing with himself which he once forgot to switch between and got busted for all to see.
These are the people BTC maxis respect and look up to.
Just amazing.
#btc #bitcoin #hijackingbitcoin #blockwars
@MineLikeAnApe@SignatureEntUK SLictionary isn’t a bounded “book”;
that’s what makes it great;
it changes with language.
Final “Come to Terms”:
English speakers:
“Own Your Words”
so we can
“Agree to Terms”
with our nieghbors
and live harmoniously!
Follow us!
Watch @TyEverett11’s good video on scalable blockchain
https://t.co/xA53YkK5ZA
Only 1 criticism:
definitions!
What @SLictionary internally called an “indexer”
https://t.co/s7EVRNTWf6
sounds like what Ty calls an “overlay”
https://t.co/LBeNAN6OEe
but does he?
(1/3)
@MineLikeAnApe Definitions now have names, like
“Ty Ev’s definition of indexer”
and they also have signatures,
and that’s important for language to be free inside a dictionary’s bounded walls.
(5/6)
cont. ⬇️