@AlboranNomad@BasedDostoevski@AvdullahYousef Just to be clear, this ruling applies not just to car or health insurance, but any kind of insurance related to products as well (apple care, product warranties)
@abdul_now@guywithlibrary@fayyadreturns Good, so his *choice* is perfect, not the act in of itself. In other words, to *not* create is as perfect as His act to create
Hence, it seems difficult to say both that the assumed human nature fails to give new esse ( a new personality) to the second person of the Trinity and that the assumed human nature fails to be an essential attribute of the divine person.
…not only according to the divine nature but also according to the human.”
But the issue with this argument, however, is that if having a hand does not fall
under a human nature, than having a hand would in fact give a new esse to the suppositum.