@AuditCanada@ShannonCulbert4@demetriosnAB Pretty sad flex, as the government supplies the funding and hasn't provided it yet. If they were serious, there would be more action and less words, don't you think?
@OlCanGuy12 Lol, where are you getting your information? Google specific contracts to get the correct information. For instance:
https://t.co/HWCZUrVb5v
@Gsscancun@bound_berta You obviously don't know that the counter to the original offer was 1.5% at the top end (10 years experience) per year, so 6%. The government rejected that and offered a free Covid shot instead.
@boehmerB@DuaneBratt This is why you have a separate judiciary. It is meant to be a check on the tyranny of the majority. I imagine many supporters of using this now, would be against forced vaccinations and the restrictions imposed during Covid.
@trentjohnsen It seems weird to me that people are upset about this. They need to get 60% of people who vote in the riding to agree. If they don't, it is over. If they do, they then need 50% to vote for a recall. This is a high bar, which means a majority felt the MLA wasn't representing them
@ittrep@trentjohnsen Having the constituents recall a MLA who they don't think is representing them is undemocratic? Wouldn't that make it more democratic?
@mittpuncher @Fordfan_751@YakkStack Funny how you know all union members vote for NDP/Liberals. Not that it would matter, as we don't elect many LPC MPs, but hey, at least you get to spout off about your ignorance! Great job.
@malta75616353@PfParks@SCC_eng How is this?
This Act shall operate notwithstanding
(a) sections 2 and 7 to 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
(b) the Alberta Bill of Rights, and
(c) the Alberta Human Rights Act.
@malta75616353@PfParks@SCC_eng What are you talking about?
This Act shall operate notwithstanding
(a) sections 2 and 7 to 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,
(b) the Alberta Bill of Rights, and
(c) the Alberta Human Rights Act.