Black American is honest and says you can’t put Black jurors on cases with Black defendants because they will side with the Black defendant and not convict them
She says “A lot of Black people don’t think deeper than race — a lot of black people are bias”
“I've been trying to hold myself back from speaking on this subject, the Karmelo Anthony case, but I've been online and I've seen a lot of videos, you know, and I'm learning more and more about it. A lot of Black people don't understand why there are no Black jurors, you know, on the trial. A lot of them don't think deeper than race, you you know, so I'm going to explain it to you.
The reason why there were no Black jurors — is because of the response on the internet from Black people about this case, about this situation. A lot of Black people actually believe that Karmelo Anthony is not a murderer — A lot of Black people believe that what Karmelo Anthony did was right.
Let me say something. If the roles were reversed, y'all would want the little white boy dead. If a little white boy stabbed a little Black boy at a school track meet, all hell would break loose. Every Black parent, every Black person would be screaming, "Life in prison! The death penalty!" People would definitely be screaming just racism, racism, racism — A lot of Black people are biased”
“So no wonder why there were no Black jurors. All because y'all wanted the little white boy to die. Y'all wanted him to die”
There is real data to support this
Black juries have a 12% conviction rate against black defendants, vs a 59% against whites. So that indicates that there is a 47% interracial bias when you have black jurors
White juries have a 33% conviction rate against white defendants, vs a 26% against blacks, which actually demonstrates a negative 7% interracial bias
Black juries have a 12% conviction rate against their own race and a 59% conviction rate against white people
Who was former CIA case officer Robert Baer talking about when he said: "I know the guy who went into his broker in San Diego and said, 'Cash me out. It's going down tomorrow.'"
On this week's edition of Come & Take It, @SaraGonzalesTX exposes the dark, disturbing, even sinister truth about the "church" where James Talarico attends and occasionally preaches.
𝗜 𝗮𝗺 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗩𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗩𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄 to root out the corruption, waste, and abuse that has taken over our state.
𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲. Money is being stolen and misused, going into places and pockets it never should.
𝗕𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽 𝗼𝗻 𝗝𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝟴𝘁𝗵. I need your vote.
𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝘁𝘁 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗺𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗼𝗿. 𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗳𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗽 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻𝘀.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘆𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲.
https://t.co/3P9O8YHeHb
#ReclaimColorado #BottomsForGovernor #ColoradoFirst 🌄🙏
Gavin Newsom is a fraud and now being exposed.
He knows it and is panicking.
His default… Blame Trump.
Even though the Investigation started under the Biden admin. LOL.
Some friendly young men saw a house with a bunch of rainbow flags had a sign out front saying they were out of ICE
Being good neighbors, they went and picked up a bag of ice to bring it to the woman, thinking her ice maker probably stopped working
This is epic
According to data about 60% or more of people who are apart of the LGBTQ+ community suffer from mental illness. So when you see them put these signs in their yard, there’s a good chance they don’t understand what they’re really supporting
NEW INVESTIGATION: Did Tax-Deductible Charitable Dollars in the Singham Network Become Political Spending?
Full investigation with receipts
🔗 https://t.co/3HLjW1xjQn
The Justice and Education Fund — a New York charity that The New York Times and congressional investigators have placed within the network financed by Neville Roy Singham — took in $68,773,701 from a single donor-advised fund, nearly all the money it reported in five of those six years. It then passed $25,991,000 on to two affiliated 501(c)(4) organizations. The pattern the returns lay out is the one the rules are meant to prevent: a charitable deduction at one end, political spending at the other, and a donor whose name never appears on the public record in between.
A donor-advised fund matters here for one reason: the donor takes the full tax deduction up front, and then the donor's name drops off the public record. The fund's return shows the fund as the giver, not the person who advised the grant. For five of six years, that one fund supplied between 95% and 99.7% of this charity's entire reported income. The charity's own auditors flagged it too: a note called "Concentration of Support" says one or two contributors accounted for roughly 99–100% of its money.
Where did the charitable money go? Into two 501(c)(4) organizations — the kind allowed to spend on politics. On their own tax returns, those two reported $22,503,500 in political-purpose spending and filed Form 1120-POL, the form political organizations file. One of them reported $18.3 million of it in a single year.
Now the part that doesn't add up. These organizations present themselves on their returns as independent — yet the same two men ran the senior operations of two of them, sharing a New York address and a single Illinois bookkeeper. On the returns where a related organization would be disclosed, each answered "No."
In 2020, the charity certified it had "no transactions with a related organization" — on the very same return that reports grants to The People's Forum, run by the same man who was the charity's only paid officer ($80,000). And the charity's own auditors, that same year, called The People's Forum "a related party through common management and Board of Director members." The tax return says one thing; the audited financials say the opposite.
Every step is legal on its own. A donor-advised fund may grant to a charity; a charity may grant to a 501(c)(4); a 501(c)(4) may spend on politics. But lined up, the filings trace tax-deductible charitable dollars toward political spending — with the original donor's name nowhere on the public record.
The question the rules exist to answer: were charitable contributions, in substance, turned into political spending? Only the IRS can see the records that settle it — the grant agreements, the donor instructions, the unredacted donor schedule — and the findings have been referred there.
I'm a forensic accountant and a registered Democrat. I follow the documents, not the politics. Every figure here is from the organizations' own IRS returns.
Full chain, line by line, with sources:
🔗 https://t.co/3HLjW1xjQn
It will probably be another five to ten years before democrats finally realize that January 6 is a losing political issue for them, and before Republicans realize that January 6 is a winning issue.
I assume TPUSA still has this audio. They should release it if they disagree with the coverage today by @RealCandaceO.
If the Rode mic continued recording after Charlie was taken down, then it should be easy to put the Rode mic theory to bed.
@CaitlinClark22
Whoop! I got a big Fever Love for "22"! You made the team look great tonight... Setting them up to score!!! 21 points 14 assists... You had to fend for yourself but you handled like a champ! And Sophie was on fire too... Queen of the 3's tonight!!! Great win! 💥💥
🚨I CANNOT TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!!!!
It has been revealed that a White 23-year-old nonverbal autistic woman was STARVED and BEATEN to de*th inside a North Carolina group home by a Black woman.
She weighed just 84 POUNDS when she passed away.
Her name was Aaliyah Fortner.
She had severe autism. She could not speak. She could not tell a single soul what was being done to her.
Over 6 months, she lost more than 40% of her body weight while the people paid to care for her watched her waste away.
Court documents say her caregivers TASED her, BEAT her with objects, broke a broom over her body, and then STOMPED ON HER HEAD.
...but it gets worse
The state had already STRIPPED this same woman of guardianship over ANOTHER nonverbal adult 2 years earlier.
But they let her keep running a home and then placed Aaliyah right into her hands.
The state failed her and Aaliyah paid for it with her life.
She was 84 pounds.
She was 23 years old.
She could not even cry out for help.
Say her name.
Aaliyah Fortner.
Spencer Pratt is refusing to concede the Los Angeles mayoral race and is taking it to court.
About damn time someone actually fought back instead of rolling over.
Do you support him? 😡🔥
#SpencerPratt
Nothing to see here…
Just Pocahontas getting out of a private jet going to her vehicle with a personal chauffeur to drive her around so she can make a video talking about how bad wealthy people are for humanity 🤣
Texas Parole Supervisor Fired for Vile Post Defending Karmelo Anthony.
Donna Murray Robinson, a Parole Supervisor with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has been fired after her inflammatory social media post about the Karmelo Anthony case went viral.
In the post, she wrote:
“I am a Parole Supervisor at TX DCJ. Karmelo will be ok, I can almost assure you he will be protected on the inside. I for one don’t give a fk about the family’s loss. It’s about time these fkng bigots feel the pain that they have inflicted on other groups of people since the beginning of time! I’m just glad we didn’t have to bury another black child. Let them start burying some of their for a change. FK’em I said what I said.”
Her extreme bias and callous comments toward the victim’s family led to swift termination.