Zur Erklärung - das hier ist nur ein Ersatz Account: nachdem ich meinen eigentlichen - @SeanCJSch - lange nicht genutzt hab, und jetzt wo ichs wollte das Passwort (und damalige Telefonnummer...) nicht weiß/finde :/ .
@dgurdasani1 Maybe can be fixed on the website? Though having a differing version is prob not ideal either...
(I've not yet understoond what the error is / how the ordering should be).
Otherwise, looking very good!
@dgurdasani1 Hey - probably almost impossible to avoid (and always frustrating..), but I thought I'd point it out anyway -
There seems to be a glitch in the timeline/table 1 :
..
November 2020
-
September 2021
-
January 2021
..
Seems to be on both the website and the pdf :/ .
Our peer-reviewed and published analysis piece for the @bmj_latest covid enquiry series on UK COVID policy on children & schools- and how children were consistently overlooked. I hope this will contribute to the UK COVID enquiry. Please read and share.
@Bryson7771@HomeopathicMed@MaximeBernier Again.
One shit doesn't mean accept the other shit.
I've long been dismayed at the inaction by the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen.
So again, this means we should roll over for the Putin-government ?
@kathrynsbach@BenMazer@zeynep@KashPrime That would seem obvious and match the medical knowledge, no?
I don't understand how someone could take a steady trend as meaning there are no new cases of LC coming in on top? (Especially since number of infections - even if high for summer - have been lower than winter/spring).
@zeynep@KashPrime@BenMazer ..and I’m just thinking about it the wrong way! — I would love to see the analysis, with the associated survey Qs. Because when I look at CPS data, in light of the various + / - post pandemic trends happening, my number doesn’t seem crazy.
@BenMazer@KashPrime I don't know - can you actually hear yourself?
Here you are saying this:
https://t.co/1AgFOsKqXY
And now claiming victim? Pretty poor show, sorry...
@BenMazer Sorry, maybe I'm missing something, but how does this fact relate to the rest of your argument.
You go on to say :
"his is much, much smaller than estimates using low sample size or poor-quality surveys that reported 20-45% of Long"
Is there a connection I'm missing? Thanks!