Serious Strategy

#Youtuber for #strategygames. Focus on #indie and complex titles.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@OAlexanderDK Wait for Seymour Hersh to pick this up... 🙄

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@HistoricalGamer @KushanGaming They are also very likely the best value for money for American security.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@PicturesFoIder Unfair, Australians use the metric system, so she had an advantage when using kg.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@shashj 1. Attritional Phase. Not necessarily the same as stalemate
2. Technology AND matériel+ doctrine
3. Not immediately, but attrition might open possibilities
4. Only if the West succumbs to Russian information warfare and ceases support. Else 🇺🇦 has attrition superiority

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@OAlexanderDK Where does attrition lead strategically though? If Western support stays high, Russian lines might collapse at some point. If not, attrition rates are unlikely to favour Ukrainian organic force generation potential.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@wartranslated Burratino -1

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@HistoricalGamer Sorry to hear that man ❤️

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@JaysonGeroux Pretty straightforward. The difficult bit about nukes is the delivery, especially in the 50ies when they were massive. So what if the prophet does not need to come to the mountain? Especially in some areas like the Fulda gap where Soviet forces would be funnelled narrowly?

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@Textyorgua_Eng I doubt the 180° course changes. Flying to Kyev and then back to something you overflew earlier? Needless exposure to intercepts and massive expenditure of delta-v.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

If you look closely you can see subtle signs the German army requires more modernisation than thought https://t.co/qrJXvv5GT6

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@RooksAndKingz @CommandDevTeam Hi Kevin. YouTuber with no professional military background but quite a few hours of command under my belt.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@OAlexanderDK Reverse Vuhledar unfortunately.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@GeneralButler_ @RALee85 On corruption. These tyres might well have been issued as „new“ a couple of times.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@simonharley Debated only by those with a one-dimensional definition of victory.

Germany inflicted more damage (minor tactical victory), but failed in its operational goal of changing the balance (operational loss). Strategically it also contributed to the successful sailor’s revolt.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@Foolish_M_Games So does it release for Dday anniversary?

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

Maybe the mission actually failed again:

[Yaroslav Trofimov @yarotrof]

Putin is literally staring at the words “Ukraine — Pays des Cossaques” across current Ukraine on this map from 1670.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

When the low-skill councillor finally finishes the „fabricate claim mission“ one year after you have declared without a casus belli, taking a stability hit. #paradox #crusaderkings #eu4

[Konstantin Sonin @k_sonin]

This is an official Kremlin video and it is totally crazy. Putin justifies his war against Ukraine by finding a (one!) 17th century map in which the Ukrainian lands are marked as a part of Russia. Ukraine didn't exist at the time, he says. So what?! United States did not exist either. Italy did not exist. Germany... Most European countries of today did not exist then.

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@JimDaws93102644 I look very much forward to this!

[Serious Strategy @SeriousStrategy]

@Jack_Watling Question for the experts: why is home-on-jam on some sort of loitering munition not much more wide spread?