Seth Southard

Cooler than a polar bear's toenails.. #Outkast Instagram: seth.southard

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@BryBryBryannnnn @Lets_Talk_HC I’m not a fan of James White either, so that checks out.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@tyabm @Lets_Talk_HC Well played.

[Provisionist Perspective 🩸🌍 @ProvisionistP]

A precarious position to be in…

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@theThinkInst Atheism is a heart problem, not a head/intellectual problem. It’s a rejection of something you already know in your heart.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@davidtaylor0390 God predetermined me to think differently.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@OrthoBroGeorg @Your_Wrongest @stackerco @JingoJungleNL @Exmo2EO @ByJimbob well, his handle alone speaks for itself ... "moral anti-realist". that's an impossible position to hold and live a consistent life.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@Your_Wrongest @stackerco @OrthoBroGeorg @JingoJungleNL @Exmo2EO @ByJimbob Paradox doesn't equal self-refutation, or logical contradiction. You're conflating those two concepts.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@Your_Wrongest @stackerco @OrthoBroGeorg @JingoJungleNL @Exmo2EO @ByJimbob how I access reality is subjective, but it doesn't follow to then make the leap that no objectivity exists. how I *apprehend* the truth is thru my subjective experience, but that doesn't mean truth in itself is subjective.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@Your_Wrongest @stackerco @OrthoBroGeorg @JingoJungleNL @Exmo2EO @ByJimbob Are you asking for my subjective opinion on that or? I ultimately think it's a paradox and hence the subject-object problem within philosophy. However, for things to be comprehensible in a meaningful way, they have to work together. a Reality -> a Knower -> a Proposition

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@stackerco @OrthoBroGeorg @Your_Wrongest @JingoJungleNL @Exmo2EO @ByJimbob @stackerco that's a universal claim which is self-refuting. Also, the way the you arrived at a belief says nothing about whether or not it's true or false... That's called a genetic fallacy. I'll be here all day 😀

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@ByJimbob @stackerco The irony is that @stackerco ‘s view is robotic. Purely governed by the laws of physics and chemistry. No purpose or design, just matter and molecules in motion. Good and evil are illusory and preference based. The low tier reddit responses never cease to amaze me.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@RealDavidReece On your worldview how would he be twisting any interpretation of scripture? … If ultimately it was decreed by God for him to interpret it that way?

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@ByJimbob No ultimate purpose is possible. Knowledge is not possible.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@Biblethumpingwi You can “define” it however you want, it logically follows. If God exhaustively decrees all things, then it happens. Period. So yes, he decreed/made/forced it to happen. I swear you guys leave your brains at the door sometimes.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@BlackLabelAdvsr 😂 that would bode over well in a court of law.

Judge: present the evidence behind these allegations.
You: well your honor I just don’t really care for his social media.

Thank goodness you weren’t the last man standing in the Clancey case.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@CCalvinism The irony of calling a Calvinist "consistent" is an amazing thing to read. lol

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@HoldenCCole Basically the same thing as saying "well, you haven't shown me any evidence that unicorns don't exist".

"No one is good except God"

Catholic: never specifically mentioned Mary by name tho. Argument invalid lol.

[Seth Southard @SethSouthard]

@theThinkInst @Biblethumpingwi The problem we’ve had in our previous conversations (and I’ll end with this) is in epistemology vs autonomy. Idk how free autonomy (w/e that means) is possible, but I don’t concede that God is the author of evil under theistic D b/c scripture tells me otherwise. James 1:13