Olivia
Online
Shane Holbrook
@ShaneH_10
Christian | Husband | Coach đ | Teacher |
Luke 17:3-4
Virginia, USA
Joined April 2011
364 Following
305 Followers
12K Posts
My research on bags in training led me to this study on agility ladders
"In youth soccer players, 6 weeks of agility-ladder training produced no significant improvement in 10 m or 20 m sprint or agility versus a control group (PadrĂłn-Cabo et al., 2020)."
https://t.co/KHY0DHoiAj
@RCMensHoops has offered Class of 2027 Forward, Jaden Edwards
We heard there are 33 days until Ohio State football đ
All Region last year 1st year playing Varsity Basketball. Coaches need to write the name down
Losing the Fun: The Psychology of the USMNT Collapse
The USMNT crashed back down to earth. After a promising start that showed a style and brand of soccer that we havenât seen much of in the menâs World Cup for our team, we went back to looking like we have for the past 20 years: over matched and out of sorts. Belgium dominated the game.
What went wrong? Iâm not a soccer expert so weâll leave tactics to someone else, but what Iâd love to focus on is the mental side.
First, what gave folks hope is that the US manager Pochettino seemed to give this team a shot in the arm of confidence and creativity. The opening match against Paraguay showed an attacking team that could solve a teamâs defense and break it down. That continued against Australia and Bosnia. Sure, those werenât top 15 teams, but it was a Paraguay squad that only lost 1-0 to France thanks to a PK, and an Australian team that only lost to Egypt in a penalty shootout.
The Americans were playing free. They were the spunky home team underdogs. Pochettinoâs refrains were âWhy not us?â and âWe want to touch the moon.â They had an Argentinean coach who blasted country music in his office and embraced American culture. And you were met with stories of Europeans traveling around the US, surprised by American culture. Itâs the power of the underdog, the power of having fun and playing free. And as weâll see, research backs it up.
But then it all changed. Balogun goes off with a shaky red card. There was no way to appeal (which, as an aside, any legitimate pro sport should have a clear appeal process for suspensions. Itâs part of good governance). But Donald Trump couldnât resist being center stage. He called FIFA president Gianni Infantino personally to ask for a review, and FIFA did what FIFA does: they suspended the ban, fined Balogun $40,000, and let him play. It was the first time since 1962 that a red card at a World Cup didnât produce a suspension. UEFA released a statement declaring that âwhen the certainty of rules is no longer guaranteed by its guardians, the integrity of the game is at stake.â Belgiumâs coach compared the decision to an April Foolâs joke.
And the narrative flips. The US goes from good vibes to villains. Belgium is incensed and uses it to create a narrative that Belgium isnât just playing for their country, but as their coach framed it âthe integrity of football.â Now, the experienced squad has a purpose greater than themselves.
The US went from playing with nothing to lose and everything to gain, to now being put on the defensive. And it showed.
From the first touch, you saw a team that was hesitant and avoidant. Gone was the aggression that capitalized on their athleticism. In its place was a situation where on one goal, three Americans stood around watching a ball come down from the air, hesitating, inwardly hoping and thinking that one of the others would get it, when a Belgian player swooped in and took care of business.
Pochettino described the potential issue weeks ago: âYour strategy can be brilliant. But if you donât have the energy, the commitment, the trust, the confidence... itâs impossible to play well.â
For the Americans, it looked impossible.
Even Pochettino couldnât explain it afterward: âWe need to assess that game and see why we didnât approach that game in the same way [we did] the rest of the World Cup... it wasnât the way we normally play.â Listen to the language. Not our tactics. Not our fitness. Our approach.
The Psychology of Playing Free or Tight
How we frame the competition sets the stage. It primes our brain to either approach or avoid, to protect or attack, to play out of fear or fun.
When weâre underdogs, research shows we give more effort, have higher levels of commitment, take more calculated risks, and have a reduced fear of failure. The reason is simple: the framing shifts our brainâs inner calculus on risks versus rewards. As underdogs, expectations are relatively low, while the payoff is huge. Itâs like playing with house money. You can bet big, and if you fall relatively short, itâs not a huge deal.
On the other end, when weâre heavy favorites, we tend to adopt a protective stance. Weâre already on top of the mountain, high in status. The only place to go is to meet expectations or lose our spot. That pushes us toward protection. We can even see this at the individual level. In an analysis of world-class soccer players, psychologist Geir Jordet found that players who had won major individual awards converted fewer penalties after winning them. And they showed more avoidance behaviors: rushing their preparation, turning away from the keeper, hurrying the walk. Status raises the price of failure. A miss is no longer a bad kick, itâs an assault on our identity.
Of course, this American team had expectations. But this framing isnât determined by some concrete evidence. Itâs shaped by the story you tell yourself and how youâre interpreting information. Itâs why weâve seen heavy favorites in the Super Bowl or NBA Finals who talk about how âno one expected us to do this... everyone discounted us... the media said we couldnât do it.â Coaches and teams strategically use information to create the right team-wide framework. Sometimes using bulletin board material of quotes from the other team to do so.
We can see this in our biology. When we see a game as a challenge, we tend to have more testosterone and adrenaline as part of our stress response. When we see the game as a threat, when our status is on the line, we have more cortisol and less testosterone. Our biology impacts our psychology, and when in threat mode, we start hesitating and avoiding.
Before Paraguay, Australia, and Bosnia, it was clear we were in a challenge state. For Belgium, threat it was.
Now, once again, itâs not as simple as favorites bad psychology, underdogs good. Itâs all about whether your frame supports your psychology. Psychologists Philip Gable and Eddie Harmon-Jones found that when it comes to emotions, itâs not whether they feel good or bad that shifts how they impact performance. Itâs whether that emotion pushes you toward or away from action. High-approach states (desire, even anger) narrow attention onto the goal. Avoidance states (anxiety) scatter it, and pleasant-but-low-drive states (amusement) broaden it. For three weeks the US played on desire that pulled toward action. Against Belgium they played on anxiety that pulled toward hesitation.
Does the framing push you to see the situation as a challenge? Does it activate approach motivation instead of avoidance? The bad boys Detroit Pistons embraced the villain role. They took it on to amplify their effort and aggression. Paraguay embraced it after the US dismantled them, shifting their strategy to be the antithesis of the âbeautiful gameâ the Europeans dream about. And it got them all the way to a 1-0 loss against the #1 seed France.
But thereâs a difference between choosing the black hat and having it slapped on your head. This US team was set up for fun, for spunky dreamers trying to show the world. They were after vibes and joy. When we talk about approach vs. avoidance strategies, itâs not that one is inherently better or worse. Itâs that your frame needs to match your style of play and psychology.
And then... that frame got thrown into turmoil thanks to politics the players had no say in. As Pochettino said, âyou need to connect with the energy to express your talent.â
That connection was lost against Belgium. They won the appeal but lost the frame.
Losing the Fun
We can see the same approach to fun in Norway, who just advanced to play England in the quarterfinals. Instead of country music, they had a Viking row and beating drums after their wins. Their star player, Haaland, said âEveryone just needs to enjoy themselves... Just enjoy it. Embrace it and enjoy the moment.â And as they won, he deliberately downplayed the moment, going so far as declaring that the next teams they faced were the favorites. Before facing France in the group stage he said, âHonestly I donât care too much [about the France game]. They [France] are probably going to win against us, theyâre probably going to win the whole tournament.â And then after knocking out Brazil: âNo matter what happens next, nobody can ever take this feeling, these tears, or this piece of history away from us.â
Heâs keeping the underdog mystique alive. Heâs keeping the stakes low and the game enjoyable, putting the onus on the more established teams to show up. Bank the win, release the future. Thereâs nothing left to protect, so thereâs nothing to play tight over.
The US had a bit of this magic. But then it all went away. And it wasnât their fault. Balogun handled the controversy like a champ, shaking the hand of the referee who gave him the red card and never complaining. Even after the Belgium lost, he went out to seek out the Belgium coach. He didnât ask for this controversy, it was thrust upon them.
This isnât to say the politics made the US lose. Great teams have to show up and play no matter what. And Belgium was clearly better that day. But what it shows is how fragile a frame can be, and how fast it can flip.
Itâs fragile, but as Pochettino pointed out, the key to unlocking our potential. Itâs why the best coaches get paid the big bucks. Itâs an art more than a science. But getting your team in the right psychological state, with the right framing, and more so in a long tournament, keeping us there is vital.
When the story flips on you, and it will, you don't get to keep the old psychology by default. You've got to sit down and write the next chapter on purpose. Before someone else writes it for you.
-Steve
![stevemagness's tweet photo. Losing the Fun: The Psychology of the USMNT Collapse
The USMNT crashed back down to earth. After a promising start that showed a style and brand of soccer that we havenât seen much of in the menâs World Cup for our team, we went back to looking like we have for the past 20 years: over matched and out of sorts. Belgium dominated the game.
What went wrong? Iâm not a soccer expert so weâll leave tactics to someone else, but what Iâd love to focus on is the mental side.
First, what gave folks hope is that the US manager Pochettino seemed to give this team a shot in the arm of confidence and creativity. The opening match against Paraguay showed an attacking team that could solve a teamâs defense and break it down. That continued against Australia and Bosnia. Sure, those werenât top 15 teams, but it was a Paraguay squad that only lost 1-0 to France thanks to a PK, and an Australian team that only lost to Egypt in a penalty shootout.
The Americans were playing free. They were the spunky home team underdogs. Pochettinoâs refrains were âWhy not us?â and âWe want to touch the moon.â They had an Argentinean coach who blasted country music in his office and embraced American culture. And you were met with stories of Europeans traveling around the US, surprised by American culture. Itâs the power of the underdog, the power of having fun and playing free. And as weâll see, research backs it up.
But then it all changed. Balogun goes off with a shaky red card. There was no way to appeal (which, as an aside, any legitimate pro sport should have a clear appeal process for suspensions. Itâs part of good governance). But Donald Trump couldnât resist being center stage. He called FIFA president Gianni Infantino personally to ask for a review, and FIFA did what FIFA does: they suspended the ban, fined Balogun $40,000, and let him play. It was the first time since 1962 that a red card at a World Cup didnât produce a suspension. UEFA released a statement declaring that âwhen the certainty of rules is no longer guaranteed by its guardians, the integrity of the game is at stake.â Belgiumâs coach compared the decision to an April Foolâs joke.
And the narrative flips. The US goes from good vibes to villains. Belgium is incensed and uses it to create a narrative that Belgium isnât just playing for their country, but as their coach framed it âthe integrity of football.â Now, the experienced squad has a purpose greater than themselves.
The US went from playing with nothing to lose and everything to gain, to now being put on the defensive. And it showed.
From the first touch, you saw a team that was hesitant and avoidant. Gone was the aggression that capitalized on their athleticism. In its place was a situation where on one goal, three Americans stood around watching a ball come down from the air, hesitating, inwardly hoping and thinking that one of the others would get it, when a Belgian player swooped in and took care of business.
Pochettino described the potential issue weeks ago: âYour strategy can be brilliant. But if you donât have the energy, the commitment, the trust, the confidence... itâs impossible to play well.â
For the Americans, it looked impossible.
Even Pochettino couldnât explain it afterward: âWe need to assess that game and see why we didnât approach that game in the same way [we did] the rest of the World Cup... it wasnât the way we normally play.â Listen to the language. Not our tactics. Not our fitness. Our approach.
The Psychology of Playing Free or Tight
How we frame the competition sets the stage. It primes our brain to either approach or avoid, to protect or attack, to play out of fear or fun.
When weâre underdogs, research shows we give more effort, have higher levels of commitment, take more calculated risks, and have a reduced fear of failure. The reason is simple: the framing shifts our brainâs inner calculus on risks versus rewards. As underdogs, expectations are relatively low, while the payoff is huge. Itâs like playing with house money. You can bet big, and if you fall relatively short, itâs not a huge deal.
On the other end, when weâre heavy favorites, we tend to adopt a protective stance. Weâre already on top of the mountain, high in status. The only place to go is to meet expectations or lose our spot. That pushes us toward protection. We can even see this at the individual level. In an analysis of world-class soccer players, psychologist Geir Jordet found that players who had won major individual awards converted fewer penalties after winning them. And they showed more avoidance behaviors: rushing their preparation, turning away from the keeper, hurrying the walk. Status raises the price of failure. A miss is no longer a bad kick, itâs an assault on our identity.
Of course, this American team had expectations. But this framing isnât determined by some concrete evidence. Itâs shaped by the story you tell yourself and how youâre interpreting information. Itâs why weâve seen heavy favorites in the Super Bowl or NBA Finals who talk about how âno one expected us to do this... everyone discounted us... the media said we couldnât do it.â Coaches and teams strategically use information to create the right team-wide framework. Sometimes using bulletin board material of quotes from the other team to do so.
We can see this in our biology. When we see a game as a challenge, we tend to have more testosterone and adrenaline as part of our stress response. When we see the game as a threat, when our status is on the line, we have more cortisol and less testosterone. Our biology impacts our psychology, and when in threat mode, we start hesitating and avoiding.
Before Paraguay, Australia, and Bosnia, it was clear we were in a challenge state. For Belgium, threat it was.
Now, once again, itâs not as simple as favorites bad psychology, underdogs good. Itâs all about whether your frame supports your psychology. Psychologists Philip Gable and Eddie Harmon-Jones found that when it comes to emotions, itâs not whether they feel good or bad that shifts how they impact performance. Itâs whether that emotion pushes you toward or away from action. High-approach states (desire, even anger) narrow attention onto the goal. Avoidance states (anxiety) scatter it, and pleasant-but-low-drive states (amusement) broaden it. For three weeks the US played on desire that pulled toward action. Against Belgium they played on anxiety that pulled toward hesitation.
Does the framing push you to see the situation as a challenge? Does it activate approach motivation instead of avoidance? The bad boys Detroit Pistons embraced the villain role. They took it on to amplify their effort and aggression. Paraguay embraced it after the US dismantled them, shifting their strategy to be the antithesis of the âbeautiful gameâ the Europeans dream about. And it got them all the way to a 1-0 loss against the #1 seed France.
But thereâs a difference between choosing the black hat and having it slapped on your head. This US team was set up for fun, for spunky dreamers trying to show the world. They were after vibes and joy. When we talk about approach vs. avoidance strategies, itâs not that one is inherently better or worse. Itâs that your frame needs to match your style of play and psychology.
And then... that frame got thrown into turmoil thanks to politics the players had no say in. As Pochettino said, âyou need to connect with the energy to express your talent.â
That connection was lost against Belgium. They won the appeal but lost the frame.
Losing the Fun
We can see the same approach to fun in Norway, who just advanced to play England in the quarterfinals. Instead of country music, they had a Viking row and beating drums after their wins. Their star player, Haaland, said âEveryone just needs to enjoy themselves... Just enjoy it. Embrace it and enjoy the moment.â And as they won, he deliberately downplayed the moment, going so far as declaring that the next teams they faced were the favorites. Before facing France in the group stage he said, âHonestly I donât care too much [about the France game]. They [France] are probably going to win against us, theyâre probably going to win the whole tournament.â And then after knocking out Brazil: âNo matter what happens next, nobody can ever take this feeling, these tears, or this piece of history away from us.â
Heâs keeping the underdog mystique alive. Heâs keeping the stakes low and the game enjoyable, putting the onus on the more established teams to show up. Bank the win, release the future. Thereâs nothing left to protect, so thereâs nothing to play tight over.
The US had a bit of this magic. But then it all went away. And it wasnât their fault. Balogun handled the controversy like a champ, shaking the hand of the referee who gave him the red card and never complaining. Even after the Belgium lost, he went out to seek out the Belgium coach. He didnât ask for this controversy, it was thrust upon them.
This isnât to say the politics made the US lose. Great teams have to show up and play no matter what. And Belgium was clearly better that day. But what it shows is how fragile a frame can be, and how fast it can flip.
Itâs fragile, but as Pochettino pointed out, the key to unlocking our potential. Itâs why the best coaches get paid the big bucks. Itâs an art more than a science. But getting your team in the right psychological state, with the right framing, and more so in a long tournament, keeping us there is vital.
When the story flips on you, and it will, you don't get to keep the old psychology by default. You've got to sit down and write the next chapter on purpose. Before someone else writes it for you.
-Steve](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HMpA_qCXoAA28uT.jpg)
Such a disappointing loss. The goals given up were absolutely pathetic
For everyone complaining about offside as a rule in soccer, think of it as a cherry picking stopper. That's what it was designed to do. The game would be boring if an offensive player could just sit in the box all day
Me trying to find one, just one pundit or former referee say that the red card was a good call
The moment was Malik's.
I still can't believe that was a red card. It was so clearly accidental and just a normal step to make when you're off balance. After multiple missed obvious yellow cards on Bosnia it's really suspect he issues a red there
That is an absolutely atrocious red card
There is a better way.
Play the penalty shootout straight after 90 mins.
The winner of the shootout gets a 0.5 goal lead going into 30 mins of extra time.
Now the team that lost the pens has a chance to win and crucially, no matter score, there is one team that has to go for it at all times, making extra time fun too.
Dream come true
The 73-win Warriors entered the Finals as the winningest team in NBA history, while Cleveland carried a 52-year championship drought.
On this day in 2016, Cleveland completed the first 3-1 comeback in NBA Finals history, winning three straight to capture its first championship đ
Best half of soccer I've ever seen the US play
@ZachFleer270 We are only hurting kids by doing that
This is why I'd like to see them try Thomas Bryant. Idk if he can guard, but he would allow us to play the 2 big lineup more often that's been so successful
Charles Barkley for head coach.
"I think they can make their lives easier if they play inside-out. Because you see Mobley and Allen have a huge advantage. That would free up Donovan and James instead of them going one-on-one trying to get their own shot."
đŁïžPREACH
Under preparation is a coping strategy for stress. It allows you to protect your ego because you didn't 'try.'
Actually putting forth effort, requires being okay confronting your limits.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Mike Lammi
Seen from United States
jisamss 
Seen from Korea
Indo bokep 18+
Seen from Indonesia
Chris Stone(18+)
Seen from United States
Backup One
Seen from Korea
pegtastic 18+ NSFW
Seen from Germany
Tonnnnn
Seen from Thailand
Zinakar Mard
Seen from France
àčàžàžàčàžȘàž”àžąàž§
Seen from Thailand
VManiak Jilbab
Seen from Indonesia
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112.9M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.9M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.5M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64.9M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.1M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers