@OneMorePoint1@kentpalace yeah the price was unreasonably high. Thought for a bit we found the next brazillian star during glasners first game at palace (Burnley game he was phenomenal)
@aj1466204@gazbod board doesnt get enough blame... Who in there right mind thinks oh we have a once in a lifetime opportunity to possibly get to the champions league if all goes well but we should sell our best cb and replace him by a club reject for free
@jxj_cpfc@AyewStringer Not a big fan of boosting a players value thats not even ours. Disasi we have no choice, richards always has proirity even if ahanor seems like a future star. Blame parish for not wanting to pull out the money to buy
@Beniesta_ our mid block is awful. Glasners mid block would have teams passing around the back for 20 minutes straight wondering how to break in. We cant play a high line anymore cuz we dont have pace in the back now that lacroix is gone..
@BearCPFC 1. He looked completely fine in pre-season. For any other play he would probably have to earn his minutes back but he is too important.
2. we never replaced lacroix
3. I think timber is a very promising signing
@0vennnn similar to what we done with chalobah. Gave him playing time. Showed the world how good he actually was and now chelsea sold him for a 30 mil profit
@0vennnn nah not harsh your completely right. We will give him the playing time needed to develop into a great cb just for chelsea to take the final product when we need him way more then chelsea ever will