California just made it a literal felony for federal agents or law enforcement to touch ballots or tamper with voting machines without a warrant. Gov. Newsom just drew a massive line in the sand against regime interference: 👇 https://t.co/uvhlt1fCmj
@jenlynncallahan Mass harvested ballots from Skid Row and the like.
Hey! Fill in this bubble and scribble your name here. Thanks.
There is a guy down the steet giving out free packs of smokes, tell them I sent you.
@jenlynncallahan I've worked with processing equipment that has to scan printed text before. Anything under ~60% usually can't distinguish between letters properly.
40% is essentially no check at all. That will scan 1 and approve it as a 4 because at least 40% of the 4 is represented.
@jenlynncallahan@DonnaDavisHNL It seems obvious the ballot harvesters knew more ballots for Bass wasn’t helpful, as she was in. They had to get Pratt out. California is a failed State.
If you personally witnessed this, Jennifer, please contact First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) and share what you saw.
This appears to be strong evidence of election irregularities — something a judge and federal investigators should hear. See his post below.
Thank you for bringing this to the public’s attention.
Wildest takeaways from my time at the Ballot Processing Center today.
✍🏻 Signatures only need to be 40% accurate (!) this is the setting the machines are set at for LA County (called the ASV)
🗳️ The last two drops disproportionately supported Raman. Are those coming from specific neighborhoods since they’re such an anomaly? Or are the neighborhoods pretty spread out that you count from on a given day? “We’re not sure.”
💌 If you’re unable to sign, you can make a “mark” like a dot or slash instead of signing. A witness then signs below.
I asked them how they verify these signatures. Turns out, they simply don’t.
Well, you must check the witness signatures, right? “No, we don’t.”
So what if I stole a ballot, made a dash by the person’s name, and signed my name? “You shouldn’t do that, but in theory it would be counted,” they said.
How many of these “marked” ballots get in per election? “We don’t know,” they said.
Ripe for fraud, no?
The problem with Scott Pelley is the same problem that has existed across the media since the 1960s -- they do not see "liberal/progressive" as being a "bias" that effects their reporting.
To them, "liberalism/progressivism" is a matter of "right v. wrong" -- liberal/progressives are "right" in their views, and the political opposition is "wrong."
This comes off of college campuses, where it has progressed over the past 30 years to the point that political opposition isn't just "wrong," it is is illegitimate and cannot be allowed as a counter-point of view in a healthy two-sided political debate.
The devolution of the Democrat party down to the DSA is a reflection of that inability to accomodate political debate.
Pelley realizes that problem, and he realizes Bari Weiss is not a "conservative" -- she's just not as progressive as the CBS News environment she was hired to lead.
But Pelley -- and the others -- don't want to be "led" in the "wrong" direction. So he pivots to a question of competence. She doesn't know television.
Really? Which aspect?
Production? She can hire apolitical staff with 50 years in TV production to manage that.
Business? -- I think the success of the Free Press answers that question.
Editorial Content -- THAT is his problem. She brought a POV that was "anathema" to CBS News.
EARTH TO SCOTT PELLEY -- THAT'S WHY DAVID ELLISON PICKED HER!!!!!!
So this proved prescient. The problem is that California law gave progressives enough time to overcome Pratt’s organic momentum with last minute ballot stuffing. Forget it, kid, it’s Chinatown.
I said before the election that I thought Raman could pass Pratt, “drafting” off his criticisms of Bass, but winning voters who would not vote for a Republican. I didn’t expect it to happen, much less watch it unfold in a way that shatters whatever public trust is left in voting.
Not everyone knows it, but Todd Blanche was the lawyer who represented Trump during all the lawfare in 2024, when everyone else was abandoning him.
Todd KNOWS what Trump has been through. And he is very, VERY pissed off about it.
He will make an EXCELLENT Attorney General.