Simon Bateson

this will never catch on.....

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@burkules Just you being a twat?

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@GrahamSmith_ @metpoliceuk Jerk

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

Two days after Henry died Hampshire Police secretly recorded Digwa in a police van speaking Punjabi to his brother. Digwa admitted stabbing Henry. Discussed claiming self defence. Made zero mention of racial abuse. Not one word.

Hampshire Police had that tape.

They knew Digwa was lying about the racist attack. They had the evidence. They had his own words and then tried to smear Henry as the aggressor anyway.

Three days after his death their statement read “it was reported two men had been assaulted by an unknown man.” Henry was the unknown man. The boy bleeding out on the street. They flipped it.

Family complained. Statement changed. Then police told the family their NEXT update would again infer Henry was the initial aggressor. His family had to fight them a second time. While grieving their murdered son.

Then during the trial Hampshire tried to issue a statement telling the public to stop talking about it online. Calling it disinformation. The CPS had to step in. Told them they were about to collapse their own murder case.

This is the force that handcuffed a dying boy. Missed the murder weapon twice. Had a secret tape proving the killer lied. And still tried to bury Henry's name.

That's not incompetence. That's a machine protecting itself. At the expense of a dead boy's reputation and three officers are still on active duty. Not suspended. Treated as witnesses. To their own actions.

Hampshire Police didn't just fail Henry on that street. They kept failing him for six months after he died.

- @Banksycat

[J Stewart @triffic_stuff_]

🚨 BOOM! Nick Ferrari just put Deputy PM David Lammy on the ropes LIVE on LBC! 🔥

“Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”

Lammy instantly flustered, stuttering like he’s been caught red-handed:

“Uhh… well I, look, I, I, I, I think… to honour what’s that family…”

Ferrari cuts through the waffle:

“It’s a yes or no, Mr Lammy. Would you take the knee for Henry Nowak?”

Lammy, clearly squirming:

“I think… no. Because, look, I don’t think the family are asking for symbolism. They’re asking for genuine common sense policing and a reduction in knife crime.”

Ferrari pounces:

“So you agree, taking the knee is mere symbolism? It was a bit of a charade at times?”

Lammy’s brain completely melts:

“That was a moment back then when we were still in the pandemic. This is today. This is this particular incident in our country that’s heart-rending.”

The pandemic?! What the actual f*ck has COVID got to do with it? 😂 His head had totally gone. Nick Ferrari absolutely broke him on air.

This is the same David Lammy who was one of the biggest cheerleaders for BLM, repeatedly defended taking the knee, slammed anyone who questioned it, and pushed the George Floyd narrative hard, yet suddenly it’s all “symbolism” and excuses when it’s a young British lad stabbed to death.

Well done, Nick Ferrari 👏 You exposed the hypocrisy and double standards for everyone to see. No wonder people are furious.

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@NevyMCI 1987
Led astray by couple of mates who supported them BUT I was the only one with a car
Mostly away games at the time as we lived in Norfolk
We were crap but the bananas were in full swing and it was a great day out despite results
Been going ever since

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@Par4Marie @pacer142 @AntoniaClinPsyc @JaniceM22974422 @Abouterf197543 @marksandspencer @SexMattersOrg You know that if they intend wearing it in public there’s probably going to be men present….?! Probably more than 1 or 2?!

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@BrainardScoles Bullshit

[Kevin Sorbo @ksorbs]

FYI, this is kier Starmer, the prime minister of the UK, kneeling for fentanyl addict George Floyd, who died of an overdose.

He hasn’t said a word about Henry Nowak, the British kid who was stabbed to death by an Indian man in his country.

Henry drowned in his own blood, and Kier can’t be bothered to even give his condolences.

[Maxi @AllForProgress_]

You might have heard of Maggie Oliver.

She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so.

Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission.

She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse.

Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills.

She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward.

Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations.

The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated.

The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions.

The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history.

That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt.

They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt.

It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure.

Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face.

The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands.

There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts.

Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace.

She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.

[SaltyGoat @SaltyGoat17]

Believing Muslims will NOT eventually subjugate your country like they did in the past to the 50+ other non-muslim countries is like believing a violent spouse won’t beat you again after beating you the other 50+ times.

That's not Islamophobic...

It's just common sense.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

Flashback: Hamas leader Fathi Hammad blew up the entire “indigenous Palestinians” lie in one sentence: the so-called “Palestinians” are nothing but Arab Muslims who invaded and settled in the Land of Israel from Jordan, Egypt, Syria, and everywhere else around them.

There was never a “Palestinian people.” Just opportunistic Arab colonizers with a made-up identity.

The left’s sacred narrative just got torched by their own terrorist heroes.

This is the ultimate red-pill truth they desperately try to hide.

Make this go viral — share it everywhere and educate the brainwashed masses before they can censor it again!

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@InvestorHex @aroundliv Ah mate…🙁 perhaps get a grown up to help you with the internet?
They’ve sharpened your wax crayons now do you can go back to your colouring🤣

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

You couldn’t make this up! 😂
https://t.co/mcYMMWpxvz

[Rm @getfreestuff01]

@RealDonKeith Same as all these cunts who think it's their right to fuck around with avacados and shit at supermarkets. Fucktards

[Simon Bateson @SimonBateson]

@SlyForTheRight So in other words… an unofficial ‘donation’ WAS declined by someone who was asking the right questions?
Perhaps the other parties could learn something from them?

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

A thought experiment.

The UK's terror threat level has just been lifted to "severe".

After yet another hideous terror attack on British Jews.

Which leads me to ask:

What would a nation that was serious about dealing with a “severe” terror threat do?

Would it run a policy of open borders, allowing 200,000 unvetted illegal migrants to stream across its border at will?

Would it allow this while KNOWING the migrants have included known terrorists, murderers, & rapists?

Would it then put these young, unvetted, fighting-age Muslim men in the very heart of its communities - next to schools & synagogues?

Would it refuse to ban the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the Muslim Brotherhood, or kick out Iranian officials who call for violence on its streets?

Would it allow convicted Islamist terrorists - such as the would-be London Stock Exchange bomber from Bangladesh - to STAY in its country?

Would it allow an army of left-wing activist lawyers to use the European Convention on Human Rights to keep foreign criminals and terror suspects in its country?

Would it allow dozens of pro-Iran associations to flourish on its own university campuses?

Would it allow terrorist sympathisers & anti-Semites to march on the streets of its own capital city week after week?

Would it be led by a political class that is so cowardly it cannot even bring itself to say: “Islamism”?

Would it insist on the myth that all threats are equal despite knowing that Islamism is responsible for 94% of terror-related deaths and three quarters of all police work linked to terrorism?

Would it allow parallel Sharia courts, cousin marriage, and illegal ‘family voting’ to become a feature of its national life?

Would it work to shut down any criticism of Islamism by imposing a definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ on public institutions and calling for politicians who do voice these concerns to be ‘sacked’?

And would it shut down any attempt to have a serious conversation about all this by denouncing those who raise it as ‘far right’, ‘hateful’, and insisting on platitudes like ‘diversity is our strength’?

I wonder.

Would a serious nation do all these things?

Because that’s what the United Kingdom is currently doing.

[Paula @paulabearthe2nd]

Dear The Police

Please continue to kick stabbers in the head.

Thanks

Lots of love

The non stabbers

[Allison Pearson @AllisonPearson]

No, Prime Minister.

You could have banned hate matches.

You could have banned pro-Iranian regime groups.

You could have deported disgustingly antisemitic imams.

You could have cracked down on mosques spewing Jew hatred.

Instead you introduced an “anti-Muslim hate” definition.

[Nadeem Shafqat @Nadeem83Shafqat]

Britain’s Jews need allies. I stand in solidarity with them. I stand with Britain’s Jews.

[Carole ✝️🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🙏 @carole_awebb]

I stand with British Jews.

Who's with me?