@knutr_sveinsson@DeleteTheNats Once again it was ww2 there was no chance to establish any ”humanitarian corridors” and that's not Finland's job anyhow. And yes Germany rejected local surrenders because they were meaningless. Also the russians there were colonizers anyhow so who cares tbh
@knutr_sveinsson@DeleteTheNats A. How should they let people out? It's ww2 lmao, Soviets didn't negotiate for shit. Second what's with the victim mentality
@knutr_sveinsson@DeleteTheNats The city housed more troops than Finland owned. And since when is siege warfare even illegal? Should states just be allowed to use their people as litteral human shields as you suggest?
@DeleteTheNats What are you talking about. When Hitler came to state visit Finland it was 1942, when Germany still held a upper hand and was seen as the plausible victor.