Journalism is not a crime.
On April 18, 2023, Turtleboy began reporting on this case and asking questions others wouldn’t.
Today marks 1,194 days.
Love him or hate him, understand what he’s fighting for. The right to investigate, ask difficult questions, and report on matters of public interest belongs to all of us.
1,194 days. Turtleboy was right then, and he’s still right today.
#FreeTurtleboy #JournalismIsNotACrime
Day 1,227 & Turtleboy is still right!
☕️ Good morning, y’all!
April 18, 2023, was the day Turtleboy first began reporting on the Karen Read case and exposing corruption. What followed became a movement
1,227 days later… Turtleboy was right then. He’s still right today. 💜🐢 Love him or hate him, remember: the principles at stake affect all of us.
Journalism, free speech, and engaging in peaceful petitioning activity are not crimes. #FreeTurtleboy #JournalismIsNotACrime
@snatchdonkeyJM Yikes, and yeah she does ask that most of the time. Wtf … who knows but Julia was like Im getting outta here, shortly after moving in with Jeff … 🤔🤨🤔
Ok but if you are that emotional and are going to act out of emotion and discuss your kids and what you think should be private family matters maybe log off. She’s come for Aidan about being a bad father, so if she responded out of emotion should we say that maybe Aidan did the same?
I actually did support Jess also, but I unsubscribed when she continued talking about Aidan and things I would view as private information he share with her. It wasn’t until she blasted out that Bederow had quit, and never confirmed it before doing so that I was like she’s not a friend. Even if Bederow had quit, wouldn’t you think it would be something Aidan would share, and not Jess. Do you agree? She’s done things similar to that from the start, and I think it’s wrong. I mean imagine you told a good friend something privately and she went on the internet and shared it with thousands of people, would you be upset? Then you ask her please don’t do that and it happens repeatedly. That is betrayal IMO
This is exactly where it crosses a line for me.
There is zero evidence presented here that anyone knows what Aidan’s daughter thinks about her father, yet people are confidently declaring that she “hates him,” will want nothing to do with him, and will eventually be mortified by him as though they have some personal knowledge of this child or her relationship with her dad. They don’t.
And the irony is hard to miss considering that just yesterday Jess publicly discussed her own past parenting decisions involving her then-14-year-old daughter and guardianship. Whatever anyone thinks about those circumstances, Jess made sure to tell people her “story” before judging her choices. Meanwhile her supporters freely invent narratives about another person’s child with absolutely no evidence.
Criticize adults for things they have actually said and done. There is certainly enough material to debate without dragging children into it or predicting how they will feel about their parents years from now. Kids should not be collateral damage in adults’ internet feuds.
His daughter already hates him. When her friends ask about him she just ignores it. I hope she has nothing to do with him. Matter of fact she would be better off without him and Julie knows he is going away soon. She makes him "watch" the kids at her house. How does a father "watch"their own kids?
Sarah you do know a true statement is not slander. Jess herself has stated Jeff hasn’t seen his child in years on a live stream.
Malicious is Jess stating Aidan is a bad dad, a bad dad doesn’t go every morning to their exes house as not to disrupt the children’s morning to get them off to school. Speaking of that why couldn’t Jess drive Julia to school every morning rather that sign her rights over to a friend? I’m just wondering what you think about that. Do you have any opinions on that?
Wonder how well it worked out… however something is definitely strange about recent #’s of views on videos IMO but I looked into it and if there is any shenanigans it’s alerted to YT even quicker when the channel is losing significant amounts of subs. If a channel has recently lost a significant number of subscribers, it is highly likely that YouTube has already flagged the channel and is actively running an audit.