Mom. Wife. Bio/Biotech PhD Candidate.
Molecular & Cell Bio l Metabolism l Evolutionary Bio l Ecology l Unaccredited Comedian l
Opinions Expressed Are My Own
Things Big Pharma doesn't want you to know... Pt.1:
This plant is Artemesia annua... AKA: Sweet wormwood. It is easy to grow and produces antimicrobial compounds with indications in fighting treatment resistant malaria... oh, and at least 3 strains of SARS-CoV-2.
Might be worth planting now... you know, in case the world decides to throw another plot twist.
Dry the leaves and stash them for tea—they’ll stay effective for years. The best part? The tea won't cause sudden death and Pfizer doesn’t make a dime 😉
@JohnCardioPA@DrNeilStone I'm not concerned, but thanks for the advice... my only goal here was to make a passive aggressive dig at a big pharma shill bot that pushes gross narratives. It brings me joy. Feel free to keep scrolling if sarcastic tongue in cheek replies aren't your jam. 😉
I understand that tongue in cheek responses with sacrcastic overtones might be difficult for some people to decipher... but since you went there, might I suggest that you also pay attention and read just one of the studies published showing ivermectin's efficacy in blocking viral replication... I also never alluded to it being an over the counter medication. I was referring to the Federal block preventing doctors from prescribing it and then the governmental pressure that prevented pharmacists from filling valid prescriptions... im not trying to fight with strangers on X. I literally just enjoy trolling Dr. Stone because it brings me joy. K. Thanks.
I am full of humility and often admit when I am wrong. Nothing in this evidentiary pre trial has produced a single moment where I questioned if Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger and killed Charlie kirk. If they have actual evidence to present at trial, I'll be the first to shout from the mountain top I am wrong. I have no allegiance to Tyler. I only wish for the truth in an effort to provide clarity and justice for charlie and his family. That, coupled with the distinct understanding that we are consistently lied to and being driven into division and distraction. That fact has proven track record. 🤷♀️
Summary of testimony from live-in boyfriend of defendent when presented with images of suspect at the scene:
"uh, I can't say for sure that is him... I mean, he wears jeans. I've never seen that hat, but he wears hats". "I've never heard Tyler even mention Charlie Kirk before".
🤡 I can't. If that isn't the definition of reasonable doubt, I dont know what is... I feel uncomfortable that so many people - that don't even appear to be on a payroll- can't critically think long enough to see the validitiy of the major issues being presented by far more people than candace.
So lets put aside the fact that the "grainy" description is reffering to the videos claiming to *definitively* prove that Tyler is depicted on campus with a rifle and shoots said rifle from the roof of a building and let's dig into the problems and inconsistencies presented here.
In his recorded testimony, Mr. Twiggs says he didn't hear from Tyler until an automated message around 11:00 p.m., yet the photos of his phone admitted into evidence appear to show a text exchange beginning around 4:30 p.m. 🤔
Also... did every subsequent text really come through within an hour of the previous message? It's odd that there aren't any additional timestamps visible on the later messages.
And another question: why are we looking at photos of screenshots on a phone?
If the decision was made to use screenshots as evidence, why not present the screenshots themselves? Or print them. Or display the original image files. Instead, we're looking at photographs of screenshots displayed on a phone, adding yet another layer of reduced image quality.
So, as I understand it, we're left with testimony that appears inconsistent with the exhibit, screenshots that don't clearly establish the timeline, and a prosecution that reportedly has the extracted phone data but presented photographs of screenshots on a phone instead.
Sure... okay. 🤡
Honest question: If his parents really turned him in, why didn't they testify at the probable cause hearing?
I'm no lawyer, but parents testifying under oath that their son confessed would seem like far stronger probable cause than the grainy, disputed videos that appear to show multiple people driving multiple Challengers—especially given the jumping timestamps and other apparent inconsistencies, including vehicles that seem to disappear between frames.
Did his parents actually tell you they received a confession? Or are you simply taking the media's word for it?
The same media that told you to stay home, "trust the science," and take an experimental EUA shot that was supposedly "safe and effective."
The same media that pushed the "Epstein files are a hoax" narrative until at least some of those files were ultimately released.
It's wild to me that people still take claims from the media or federal agencies at face value without questioning them.
@Bobcollins28468@DrNeilStone This one backfired, huh?
To be clear, I'm not celebrating anyone's cancer diagnosis, nor am I suggesting that @JeremyClarkson's cancer was caused by vaccination.
That said, the timing is... difficult to ignore.
So, just to be clear...
The plan is to take an already unnecessary "vaccine," make it potentially more dangerous, and somehow still avoid addressing the very real serious adverse event concerns associated with the first generation of mRNA shots?
Is this actually real life?
"Flabbergasted" doesn't even begin to describe the level of disbelief I'm experiencing right now. Every time I think we've hit "clown world rock bottom", another trap door opens beneath it. 🤡🙄🤔😭😵💫
@uTobian@AaronSiriSG@RWMaloneMD@KMilhoanMDPhD@docbiss@goddek@MaryBowdenMD@thehealthb0t@DoctorCole@PierreKory@JDaley@joerogan@SecKennedy@BGatesIsaPyscho
FDA to consider Moderna’s new mRNA flu vaccine https://t.co/BNfTep9Gur via @YouTube
Sir, Are you sharing your daily affirmations here?
This comment seems misplaced... and, as an insult, seems intellectually lazy...
That being said, I do think it would be entirely appropriate to add to a list of things you say to yourself while looking in the mirror every morning...
I even have some additional statements you could include - if you're open to suggestions:
"You are a fraud."
"You lack integrity."
"You are a liar."
"You have whored yourself at the expense of human lives."
"You are at best delusional, but more likely truly evil."
"You should repent, come clean, and ask for forgiveness"
Just a few of the top of my head... hope they are helpful!
There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism ...except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism:
▪️ https://t.co/9PBis1NeN0
▪️ https://t.co/BnGp3LHpNY
▪️ https://t.co/GZg2u91uyH
▪️ https://t.co/HxyJhJ9eTU
▪️ https://t.co/UxGxKAQhcJ
▪️ https://t.co/pMF2i9yH4L
▪️ https://t.co/0gN0fSNtKK
▪️ https://t.co/d3fELVQ3bO
▪️ https://t.co/nerRN2PiFm
▪️ https://t.co/z3Jr3j1L4T
▪️ https://t.co/dfXwUj6L37
▪️ https://t.co/rsAb6yiTp6
▪️ https://t.co/T7FGd5W39O
▪️ https://t.co/WB7eA9gfwb
▪️ https://t.co/CIApYvYcxV
▪️ https://t.co/gVt803ebzu
▪️ https://t.co/8aif6nRsWz
▪️ https://t.co/g8R2I7z9Rb
▪️ https://t.co/Ou4Op0TVgP
Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism
▪️ https://t.co/cm2GtMLmYG
... and autism being listed in the inserts....
The resignation letter written by the University of Georgia’s Turning Point chapter President is worth reading.
Though I doubt she will ever receive an apology from anyone on the executive team, we can at least share and hope @JDVance sees it.
Classy and well-stated.
🚨Horrifying: Dr Suzanne Humphries exposes what DTaP, Polio & Hib 'Vaccines' do to babies.
The shots cause the activation of 33 allergy genes & 66 asthma genes plus the upregulation of 67 cancer genes & 25 immunological genes.