@HankDesmondPhD He is a convicted rapist according to the law and you support him, therefore you support a rapist and have bad judgement, or are bad yourself. Professor of logic my ass
@HankDesmondPhD There’s no such thing as radical democrats because democrats are capitalists. You can say radical communists but liberals are centrists and there’s no such thing as radical centrism. Disappointing for an alleged professor of logic
@LegalAINinja@kevinnbass@elonmusk Wasn’t the original accusation that Twitter was run by liberals? And don’t they have an anti-ai agenda? So wouldn’t they encourage criticism of AI like this? Idk your comment seems inaccurate
@MikeAKAOisin@kevinnbass Someone raises awareness and gets a movement behind the call to build public pressure. It’s called democratic oversight. Extremely simple concept.
@om_patel5 Because it’s burst in popularity after the federal autonomous weapons controversy spiked their growth something like 80x and they’ve not been able to keep up with demand since so everyone gets throttled instead of just making a waiting list for new users. It’s greed.
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan Are you using non-sequitur and ad hominem because you don’t know how to engage with the content of conversation anymore? Do you want to believe that your party is acting with freedom and liberty as opposed to oligarchic influence? I get it. I love make believe.
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan Yes I am, and I think they should all go to jail even if Barack Obama is in the files because I’m not a Democrat and I view the DNC and RNC as hi-jacked by corporations and AIPAC and any US citizen still identifying along party lines is a victim of corporatist propaganda.
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan You called them close and you’re pivoting because it’s not working out for you. Why did POTUS blow the whistle on Epstein in 2006 just to later deny he knew anything? Because he’s lying. And idk who you’re trying to group me with. Republicans are tired of it too
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan So your argument is, they were very close, therefore probably not involved. That’s backwards logic. The closer they were the more likely POTUS was involved or at least covering up after he flip flopped and started denying he knew anything after he said he did in 2006
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan We’re passed that because we’re now reviewing the concrete evidence where POTUS is mentioned over 38,000 times in the Epstein files
@eandrewb@SchmittNYC Nothing is neutral. Everything is political. You either support egalitarianism in every aspect of your life or you’re an authoritarian poser. This is very simple. Also red states have the lowest literacy rates in the nation so you now sound uneducated by repeating propaganda
@marcvelitrae@theliamnissan Then why did he backtrack in modern history and start denying he knew anything? Somewhere along the way he developed a motivation to lie about what he knew in 2006 because he now denies it.
@jammles9@theliamnissan You have to be hard of hearing to not notice the part where he starts lying about his knowledge of Epstein. Why did he go from blowing the whistle to denying what he knew? Because between then he became a part of it.
@LauraLoomer The U.S. has already eliminated the middle class. Eliminate the lower class and your bachelors degree will be spent cleaning the sewers with a trajectory for recession as a smaller burgeoning depression pays into social security implying the foundation for retirement diminishes