Señor presidente @petrogustavo,
Hace algún tiempo planteé una propuesta similar a Hillary Clinton, tras sus críticas sobre el sistema penitenciario en mi país. Hasta hoy, sigo a la espera de una respuesta.
Permítame entonces extenderle la misma invitación, con el mayor respeto.
Si, como usted sostiene, en nuestro país existen “campos de concentración”, estaríamos frente a una situación que no admite términos medios, sino decisiones firmes en favor de la dignidad humana.
En ese espíritu, El Salvador está dispuesto a facilitar el traslado del 100% de su población carcelaria, todos, incluyendo los llamados presos políticos y cualquier otro caso que considere viole su política del “amor y la vida”.
Únicamente bajo una condición que entiendo será compartida por usted: deben ser todos. Porque si se trata de “campos de concentración”, incluso un solo detenido que permanezca allí sería inaceptable.
Esta es una oportunidad histórica para consolidar su legado como el libertador que extendió la cuerda firme de la justicia, para sacar a miles del abismo de la exclusión.
🚨MINDBLOWING STRC SINGULARITY🚨
Let's say Strategy buys 1,000 Bitcoin today with STRC issuance.
Will probably be more, but I like clean math.
Bitcoin is at $65,300.
1,000 x $65,300 = $65.3 million raised
The annual dividend obligation on this raise:
$65.3 million x 0.1125 = $7,346,250
10 years of an 11.25% dividend would be $73,462,500.
After 10 years at a 25% Bitcoin CAGR, $65.3 million grows to approximately $608 million.
That’s about a 9.3× increase over the decade.
Spread captured after 10 years of dividend payments:
$534.58 MILLION.
From 1 DAY of STRC issuance.
And you're bearish on MSTR?
LOL
What we are witnessing today is the largest ethno-cultural upheaval in Europe since the arrival of the Yamnaya around 5,000 years ago.
They laid the foundation of the European tribes and, ultimately, modern European nations.
Since then, there has been an unbroken chain of ethno-cultural continuity. All foreign invasions, from the Huns to the Ottomans to the Moors, were ultimately repelled.
Today, within just a few decades, this chain is being broken. The people living in huge parts of Europe, France, Germany, England, and Italy in 100 years will not be the descendants of those who lived there 100 years earlier.
This has never happened in the last 5,000 years.
So forgive me if I don’t care whether someone calls me racist or whether a leftist judge claims we should be banned.
Far more is at stake than a delusional anti-white universalism. That ideology is only a few decades old and will fade away.
What must endure is resistance to this threat. Every people deserves an identity, a culture, and a homeland. I want to take nothing from anyone. I simply want to live this life and pass it on.
If you think that makes me evil, then that makes you evil.
Strategy has submitted its response to MSCI’s consultation on digital asset treasury companies. Index standards should be neutral, consistent, and reflective of global market evolution. Read our letter and share your support: https://t.co/yiPRYyw5Lk
Strategy has acquired 10,624 BTC for ~$962.7 million at ~$90,615 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 24.7% YTD 2025. As of 12/7/2025, we hodl 660,624 $BTC acquired for ~$49.35 billion at ~$74,696 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC $STRK $STRF $STRD $STRE https://t.co/oyLwSuW7nW
The invisible cost to every Robinhood $HOOD trade you make - their trades are not free!
- "Robinhood trades are not free"
- "When you pay for order flow, you're probably charging your customers more, and pretending to be free"
- "It's a very dishonourable, low grade way to talk"
- "Nobody should believe Robinhood's trades are free"
Translation:
Robinhood doesn’t charge commissions, but it makes money by selling your trades to market makers i.e. “payment for order flow”.
Instead, when you click Buy, Robinhood sells your order to a big trading firm (Citadel etc).
That firm executes it and pays Robinhood for sending the order.
Example:
- If the best price in the market is $10.00, but you get filled at $10.02, that 2 cents difference looks tiny…
but over thousands of trades and millions of users, that’s real money.
- You didn’t pay a commission, but you still paid in the form of a slightly higher price!
You feel like it’s free, but you get slightly worse prices on every trade!
That cost is invisible - but you're still paying it!
In addition:
Those firms (Citadel etc.) also get visibility into retail order flow.
They see what millions of small traders are doing and can position themselves more effectively to profit from you!!!
Common Sense Investing TIP:
- If a business says something is free, but earns money from your activity, it’s not free! - never forget.
The invisible cost to every Robinhood $HOOD trade you make - their trades are not free!
- "Robinhood trades are not free"
- "When you pay for order flow, you're probably charging your customers more, and pretending to be free"
- "It's a very dishonourable, low grade way to talk"
- "Nobody should believe Robinhood's trades are free"
Translation:
Robinhood doesn’t charge commissions, but it makes money by selling your trades to market makers i.e. “payment for order flow”.
Instead, when you click Buy, Robinhood sells your order to a big trading firm (Citadel etc).
That firm executes it and pays Robinhood for sending the order.
Example:
- If the best price in the market is $10.00, but you get filled at $10.02, that 2 cents difference looks tiny…
but over thousands of trades and millions of users, that’s real money.
- You didn’t pay a commission, but you still paid in the form of a slightly higher price!
You feel like it’s free, but you get slightly worse prices on every trade!
That cost is invisible - but you're still paying it!
In addition:
Those firms (Citadel etc.) also get visibility into retail order flow.
They see what millions of small traders are doing and can position themselves more effectively to profit from you!!!
Common Sense Investing TIP:
- If a business says something is free, but earns money from your activity, it’s not free! - never forget.
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.”
Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free but what about the other six men?
The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage.
They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).
The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.
But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.
But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!
And that’s how it works.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
BREAKING🚨 BILLIONAIRE MAX KEISER STATES THAT IF STRATEGY $MSTR SURGES 50%, IT COULD POTENTIALLY BANKRUPT JPMORGAN
JPMorgan Chase was fined for NAKED SHORTING in South Korea.
JPMorgan now holds a significant short position in MSTR.
LIKE 👍 if you want to see JPMorgan fall
🚨CALL TO ACTION: BOYCOTT JP MORGAN CHASE - JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S BANKER🚨
A new U.S. Senate Finance Committee memo reveals JPMorgan massively under-reported Jeffrey Epstein’s suspicious transactions for nearly TWO DECADES.
From 2002 to 2016, JPMorgan filed SARs on only $4.3 million in Epstein-linked transactions.
Then, after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death, the bank suddenly filed SARs covering over $1.3 BILLION in Epstein-related wires, withdrawals, and transfers.
The memo shows JPMorgan’s internal compliance flagged red flags for years.
Senior executives were repeatedly alerted.
The bank kept Epstein as a client anyway.
They’ve since paid $290 million to Epstein’s victims.
These are not rumors.
These are not “conspiracy theories.”
These are government-documented facts, bank filings, and court records.
And we’re supposed to believe THIS institution is a paragon of “market integrity” when it comes to MSTR - the one company structurally threatening the credit-debt system JPMorgan profits from?
Give me a break.
This is the old financial regime protecting itself, not you.
Move your money to platforms that don’t ignore red flags for 20 years.
FULL BOYCOTT OF JP MORGAN.
🚨BREAKING: JPMORGAN WANTED A WAR WITH BITCOIN - NOW THEY HAVE ONE🚨
JPMorgan really thought they could kneecap MSTR and nobody would notice.
They thought Bitcoin people were still asleep, still obedient, still grateful to beg for “permission” from legacy banks that survived 2008 by getting bailed out like failed casinos.
Nah.
If a bank takes hostile shots at the companies you believe in, you don’t reward them with your business.
YOU WALK.
You move your capital, your brokerage accounts, and your attention to platforms that don’t actively spit in your face.
Nobody is telling anyone what to buy or sell.
Nobody is coordinating anything.
This is way simpler than that.
It’s called personal sovereignty.
If a megabank behaves like a political actor instead of a neutral financial institution, then investors have every right to take their portfolios somewhere else, somewhere that doesn’t treat Bitcoin-aligned companies like a threat.
You want to support MSTR, BTC, or any company building a better financial system?
Then keep your assets with brokerages that actually respect the future and don’t wage shadow campaigns against it.
Legacy institutions don’t get to sabotage innovation on Friday, then ask for your business on Monday.
Move where you’re respected.
Move where your capital isn’t collateral in somebody else’s agenda.
Move where your choices matter.
JPMorgan made their position clear.
Now investors get to make theirs.
BOYCOTT JPMORGAN.
An Open Letter to @JeffBezos:
I will be canceling all of my accounts and divesting completely from @jpmorgan@Chase because Jamie Dimon is, was, and will forever be Jeffrey Epstein’s banker.
More recently, his vicious, backhanded attacks on @saylor and @Strategy put him in opposite to capitalism, freedom, sound money, and the long term interests of the United States of America.
My only remaining Chase account is my @amazon card. I will be cancelling this as well, but I want to continue patronizing @amazon and @WholeFoods and the card offers substantive benefits (5-6-% cash back) at both locations.
Please consider putting bitcoin on the Amazon balance sheet and moving the Amazon card to a less ethically problematic bank - or, better yet, work with @davidmarcus and @lightspark to cut out the banking middlemen entirely and settle directly on the free/open Lightning Network. The value captured can be returned directly to customers.
Jamie Dimon is a manifest enemy of capitalism and innovation. As an icon of both, you should lead the charge away from crony capitalist phonies like Dimon, sucking on the teat of the government leviathan.
Building on a Bitcoin standard means adhering to the motto that has led directly to your success: putting customers and their interests front and center.
Sincerely,
Bitcoiners
“Consumers don't produce inflation. Producers don't produce inflation. Inflation is produced only by too much government spending and too much government creation of money, and nothing else.”
— Milton Friedman