Stubborn Genius X

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@TheRawEvidence @BrysonGray You realize regulation in Leviticus is regarding ceremony mourning practices for fallen loved ones, along with not scarring oneself in mourning for said loved ones, right?

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Yes, yet only in the way that Peter struggled with peer pressure to others to follow the additional laws that they had added and cowardly back of association with the gentiles in direct contradiction of the revelations he received through his dream and in Christ’s example.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Objectively speaking, my boy. lol Thanks but actually try reading the Bible.

I’m going to have to say actually read the scriptures in full. Stop verse and chapter hopping. You’re exposing yourself to being ignorant. You are out here looking crazy. Lol Sounding like a heathen.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray The continuation- 11 “Right then three men who had been sent to me from Caesarea stopped at the house where I was staying. 12 The Spirit told me to have no hesitation about going with them.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Acts 11- The voice spoke from heaven a second time, ‘Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.’10 This happened three times, and then it was all pulled up to heaven again.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Acts 11- So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcised believers criticized him3 and said, “You went into the house of uncircumcised men and ate with them.”
4 Starting from the beginning, Peter told them the whole story

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Acts 10 - 27 While talking with him, Peter went inside and found a large gathering of people. 28 He said to them: “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray Acts 10 - 27 While talking with him, Peter went inside and found a large gathering of people. 28 He said to them: “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray And what it says as the only penalty and remedy-

Leviticus 7
“You will make yourselves unclean by these whoever touches their carcasses will be unclean till evening.” The prohibition of association that was added later was unfounded in regard to the Torah. Peter’s revelation.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray So, after reading these verses no ways to be found are any clarifications/corrections regarding Peter’s vision nor any points to favor your unbiblical beliefs. In fact the opposite is presented favoring the rest of the scripture as I presented.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @mmamasaidd @BrysonGray So which scripture says any of this and makes this clarification correcting Peter’s own clarification/revelation? Or you just simply attempting TAKE AWAY from his statements/scripture and ADD what isn’t written in the scriptures?

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DerickMcAfee @BrysonGray That was a dream he had not a conscious dialogue with God, buddy. Try reading. He woke and did not understand the dream, then later just a few passages later in the same book and chapter Peter has a revelation of what the dream meant. You actually have to read, bud. lol

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DocKrease @BrysonGray Dude, that is satanic doctrine by definition. So come to rescue us from the protection of the Law so we can be lawless criminals and he does so by speaking through the man whom also said to keep all of the Law, commands & teachings but then for some reason it is abolished?

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DocKrease @BrysonGray We don’t have to try hard at all. All any one needs is basic reading comprehension. lol. It is right there in Mathew 5. Yashua did not come to abolish any of the law and he condemns all does not keep or teach other to not keep even the least of the law. It is plain and clear.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@neJeremy @tlnbrad @BrysonGray You’re a Pagan.
Repent.

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@DocKrease @BrysonGray In the respective “Laws, Commands and teachings of the Prophets”

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@neJeremy @BrysonGray The Word became flesh, the prophecy of the messiah whom is one with God Yashua, yes. Keep reading buddy. lol

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@neJeremy @tlnbrad @BrysonGray You pick your favored verse and ignore the others that give the context of what is written for understanding, unless you’d have to take the ignorant position of that these scriptures contradict one another, and then make up unbiblical theories such as the Greco pagan gentiles did

[Stubborn Genius X @StubbornGeniusX]

@neJeremy @tlnbrad @BrysonGray Part 2 - then we fit the description of the title given in Psalms 82 yet we would not be the Christ. That is a different position entirely, again still not the almighty Heavenly Father creator of all. We have to put all of the scriptures in context together.