Investing T

Investing Account

[gus @igus_ai]

🚨THIS COULD BE ONE OF THE BIGGEST OPPORTUNITIES IN YEARS

Grok Bot can basically run a faceless YouTube channel for you.

This faceless YouTube channel is reportedly making $21,534/MONTH.

• 1.2M subscribers
• 1,100+ uploads
• 410M views from just its 6 biggest Shorts

And the craziest part?

You can automate almost the entire operation with AI for very little money.

Grok Bot can find the clips, edit them, add captions, prepare the posts, upload them and keep your content calendar full.

No camera.

No editing team.

No spending hours every day doing it manually.

The setup can cost as little as $1 to test, with Postiz starting at $0.

Someone just published a step-by-step guide showing exactly how to build this workflow with Grok Bot, Vugola and Postiz.

This is one of the most interesting faceless content opportunities right now👇

[Anatoli Kopadze @AnatoliKopadze]

This is the best 2 hours on graph engineering ever recorded, Andrew Ng breaking down how to build agentic knowledge graphs from scratch:

9:14 - your first working agent
33:11 - how loops actually work
1:02:46 - turning loops into working graphs
1:30:15 - agents that improve their own code
1:49:05 - a system that runs the whole thing for you

I've seen $500 courses that teach less than this video alone.

Watch it, then take it further with my step-by-step guide on graph engineering below.

[Lunar @LunarResearcher]

Andrej Karpathy spent 8 years working at OpenAI and Tesla

Last week, he condensed everything he knows into one free 2-hour lecture

People spend $15K on bootcamps that teach less than half of this

You probably don't have two hours to watch it right now

Just don't let it disappear in your feed

Save it, watch it later, then read the guide below and build your first loop

[Atif Hussain @AtifHussainOG]

God put trading into your life for reasons other than money.

He did to remove greed, fear and emotional weakness in your life.

Trading came into your life to force you to live up to your full potential.

It's your destiny.

[L2WTrades @L2WTrades]

talked to a guy who's been trading 23 years and manages $40M

asked him what separates traders who survive from traders who blow up

his answer surprised me

it wasn't strategy. it wasn't discipline. it wasn't psychology.

"bet sizing. that's it. that's the whole game."

here's what he explained:

THE THESIS:

"I've seen hundreds of traders come through. good ones. smart ones. talented ones."

"90% of the ones who blew up didn't blow up from bad trades. they blew up from bad sizing on normal trades."

"a 1R loss at proper size is nothing. a 1R loss at 10x proper size is account death."

THE EXAMPLES:

he walked me through case studies:

TRADER A:
- excellent strategy, 58% WR
- consistently profitable for 2 years
- had a "high conviction" trade
- sized up 5x normal position
- trade lost
- drawdown was 23% instead of 5%
- psychology cracked
- revenge traded the next week
- blew the account in 8 days

"he didn't blow up from a bad trade. he blew up from a big trade."

TRADER B:
- mediocre strategy, 51% WR
- survived for 11 years
- never sized above 0.8% per trade
- took the same size on every trade
- no "high conviction" sizing
- compounded slowly but never blew up

"he's worth $4M now. started with $50k. just never killed himself with size."

THE RULE:

"every trader who blows up violates the same rule"

"they size based on CONVICTION instead of MATH"

"'this one feels right' so they go bigger"
"'I'm on a winning streak' so they go bigger"
"'I need to make it back' so they go bigger"

"conviction is how you justify stupid sizing"

THE DATA:

he showed me internal research:

traders who sized based on conviction:
- average survival time: 2.4 years
- account explosion rate: 74%

traders who sized mathematically (same size every trade):
- average survival time: 8.3 years
- account explosion rate: 12%

"it's not even close. variable sizing kills traders."

THE MATH:

he broke down why "high conviction" sizing is stupid:

"let's say you're 60% accurate on normal trades"
"let's say you're 70% accurate on 'high conviction' trades"

"sounds good right? go bigger on the 70% trades?"

"wrong. here's why:"

"at 60% accuracy with 1% risk, a 4-loss streak costs you 4%"
"at 70% accuracy with 5% risk, a 4-loss streak costs you 20%"

"and 4-loss streaks happen even at 70% accuracy"

"you FEEL more confident but the math doesn't justify the size increase"

THE SOLUTION:

"how do you size then?"

"same size every trade. no exceptions."

"what about when you're really confident?"

"same size. confidence isn't accuracy."

"what about when the setup is perfect?"

"same size. perfect setups lose 40% of the time."

"what about when you're on a winning streak?"

"same size. streaks end."

"every trade gets the same respect. the 'boring' ones and the 'perfect' ones."

THE IMPLEMENTATION:

his rules for position sizing:

1. calculate your base risk (0.5-2% depending on account size and edge)
2. that's your risk on EVERY trade
3. never size up. ever.
4. if you want more money, scale accounts/capital. don't scale risk.

"I've been trading 23 years. I've never taken a trade above 2% risk. not once."

"my biggest winners and my 'meh' trades got the same size"

"I'm not trying to hit home runs. I'm trying to not strike out."

THE TRUTH:

retail traders think they need big trades to make big money

professionals know big trades make big losses

the traders managing real money all size conservatively

they make money through VOLUME of good trades not SIZE of individual trades

if you're varying your position size based on "conviction":
you're already on the path to blowing up

it's just a matter of when

same size
every trade
no exceptions

that's how you survive

[John @market_sleuth]

6670 gap fill on Monday? 👀No matter how you slice it the failure to hold the gains today isn’t accumulation, it’s distribution.

[MapleStax Trades @MapleStax]

The Trader’s Journey:

Where are you on this chart?

$SPY $QQQ $TSLA $AAPL $NVDA

[Ripster @ripster47]

🚨
"RIP , How do I Chose my Option Strikes To Trade"?

Ok Fam, Here you go
"Option Strike Selection Cheat Sheet"
@TENETTRADEGROUP @TenetCharts @tenet_research

[Ryan Detrick, CMT @RyanDetrick]

In mid-February we started to warn about a banana peel sell-off. Everyone was all bullied up back then and this wasn't a popular call.

No, we didn't expect a bear market, but weakness early in 2025 was a high probability and we were on record a 12-15% correction was likely.

[Peter DiCarlo @pdicarlotrader]

$NVDA is creeping over $140 but I’m not in yet.

There’s one key trigger I’m watching. If it fires, I’ll go long and history says this could kick off a multi-year breakout. 🚀

Last time it set up like this, $NVDA ran 500% in two years. 🤑

In this video, I break down exactly what I need to see before I load up again.

If you’re serious about printing on NVIDIA, watch this. 👇

[ThiccTeddy @ThiccTeddy]

IS THE DEATH CROSS ON $SPY GOING TO SEND US TO NEW LOWS?!??!?!

Let's look at the historical data & find out. I'll be analyzing all of the Death Crosses over the last DECADE

LET'S FIND OUT IF WE ARE SCREWED☠️☠️☠️

[Bio Sports Picks @ProsKnowSports]

Retweet for tonight's MLB Top Investment of the Week DMed to you for FREE
4/18 #MLB Free Biorhythm Play Of The Day
http://t.co/gAXYZ2CcRz

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

(2-2) -$33
04/17
Cle vs Det UNDER 7 -110 $200
2 stud pitchers going to pitch like it today. I like under 4.5 so I will take the 7

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

(1-2) -$230
04/16
Pit vs Cin UNDER 7 $200

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

Was in meeting so late posting. Last minute play on Pit v Cin Under 7 -110 $100. Cold weather. Plus playing the line

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

(1-0) +$100
04/15
Stl vs Mil OVER 8 -110 $200

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

(1-0) + $100
04/15
Stl vs Mil OVER 8
It's funny how little change in lineup and bats come alive. Like Stl lineup, don't trust Estrada

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

Got lucky tonite with void Pit/Cin game. Bad capping. Will be better tomorrow #bettinglife #raindelay

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

@AJsPlays what's your feeling on Rays. I'm leaning Bal. Rays getting love after wins at Cin and Bal getting nothing after poor perf vs jays

[Investing T @TC_Picks]

(1-0 +$100)
April 14,2014
Pit vs Cin Under 7.5 -105 $200
Both above average pitchers. Pit unders in April are $$. Homer gets in line tonite