@NiohBerg Actually, he's an opportunist with no shame, the only reason one might call him "moderate" is because he speaks fluent English on American television while the cabinet ministers he appointed are psychopathic religious fanatics (Eg. Ben-Gvir.)
When you openly venerate the likes of Ibn Taymiyyah and Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab – who pioneered the idea that Shi'a Muslims are heretics and apostates, and who supplied the doctrinal fuel for sectarian Wahhabi terror and persecution of Shi'a – and when you make blanket takfir of Alawites, you can hardly complain about the names you have been called.
You have been co-opted by the very forces responsible for the Arab world's abandonment of Palestine and its submission to the Jewish Empire. You are now engaged in the same sectarian fraud – rooted in CIA- and MI6-funded propaganda – that overwhelmed the critical thinking of many Sunnis, making them accomplices to the destruction of Resistance supply lines.
Your disingenuous cry of 'sectarianism' rings hollow to anyone paying attention. We can see who you are and what you're doing. Truly, what a shame.
I would like @KevinPWalling@Hymamoore to affirm Thomas Jefferson as the honorable & rightful founder of @TheDemocrats & that @MarkHalperin ask the same of all his “dem guests” & reject those who reject Jefferson. In so doing, we may progress rational radical rhetoric in the USA.
@capregime@SanaELedene Yes that was wrong but perhaps Assad has learned his lesson & if not a back channel to @PahlaviReza should be established.
Any alternatives to Assad?
Arabs are wed to Persians in the Shahname. Is it not so?
The serpent race cannot be thus separated & ignored; it is part of us.
@brooasdfe2 No he didn't. He actually mentioned how he doesn't like this new guy because he used to be an Al-Qaeda member. He said he hopes they don't need another revolution to get rid of him.
“Truly the most fascist mofos are the holier than thou’s…”
——
@gforemanBCP calls @jemelehill out FOR HER HYPOCRISY!
(Once folks realize Jemele figure types are puppets of the DEEP RIGHT
—IT’s GAME OVA)
https://t.co/VAgnZzsE1i
Marxism= Neo-Feudalism (the Nomenklatura as the New Feudal Lords)
One of the first academic disciplines that the Marxists took over was "history" because anyone who understands history would recognize that Marxism was a power grab by a bunch of power hungry spoiled children of a Feudalistic elite and opportunistic criminals from the beginning! The reason Marxism is still popular in academia is their rewiring of history!
Marx developed his theories in 19th-century Western Europe, observing the harsh, early transitions from feudalism to industrialization in Great Britain and Germany:
- His worldview was deeply shaped by European class rigidities, where wealth was historically tied to hereditary land ownership, monarchical privileges, and state-sanctioned monopolies. He envisioned a global scale system monopolized by a monopolistic feudal state (the only economic model he fully understood and was relevant in Europe at the time) that provided every peasant equally.
- Marx largely ignored or misunderstood the dynamics of classical liberal America, which was built on a foundational philosophy of individual rights, a constitutionally limited government, decentralized power, and widely accessible private property ownership.
In practice, every Marxist-Leninist state (and Maoist, Castro, Kim,... and other Marxist regimes) practically developed a strict hierarchy dominated by the Nomenklatura, a small, highly privileged circle of Communist Party elites.
While the system claimed that "the people" owned the means of production, the state controlls everything, and the Party elites controlled the state. These elites enjoy private luxury dachas, exclusive state-run stores, and immense power, while ordinary citizens and peasants faced strict rationing and severe restrictions on travel, this structure directly mirrored a feudal estate system, where the peasants were effectively bound to state-run collective farms just as serfs had been bound to a lord's land, unable to leave without official state permission!
Marxist economies are Feudalistic forms of "state capitalism" where the state is the feudal owner of everything and everyone! When private property rights are abolished, the state becomes the sole employer, the sole landlord, and the sole provider of goods. In this environment, dissent becomes impossible because the state can simply withhold food, housing, or employment. Instead of achieving a classless society, the system turns into a massive, monolithic corporation (STATE CAPITALISM) where the Party leadership acts as the monopolistic shareholder and the board of directors.
An economic ideology is always the recipe of absolute dictatorship: who controls the resources, who holds the monopoly on force, and how they use ideology to justify subjugating everyone else.
When a system outlaws private property, it doesn't eliminate ownership; it simply consolidates all ownership into a single, absolute monopoly, the state apparatus. The "collective" is an illusion, the state not the people own and control the collectives and when the elites solidify power and control, that illusion also goes away and it becomes a purely military dictatorship, as you can see in China, Russia, Cuba and North Korea. Because an abstract entity like "the public" cannot physically manage a factory, a farm, or a supply chain, physical control must fall to specific individuals, those individuals who are instruments of the monopolistic state power, naturally form a ruling elite who wield total leverage over the population's survival. If you control a person's access to food, housing, and work, you don't just employ them, YOU OWN THEM. Dependence is the ultimate tool of enslavement and the reason socialist politicians always try to invent new ways of taxing people and private enterprise to poverty while making the public more dependent on their "programs" that are really designed to pave their way to the monopolistic ownership of that nation!
This is the logo of SAVAK, the security apparatus under the Shah of Iran.
In English, it was the “National Security and Intelligence Organization.”
In Iranian: Sāzmān-e Ettelā'āt va Amniyyat-e Kešvar (سازمان اطلاعات و امنیت کشور).
It went after communists & violent Islamists. That’s why Western Leftists - the wannabe communists - demonize SAVAK today.
@jacquelinecmary “Foundation for Responsible Pet Ownership”
An (apolitical) Vision For You!
(Chloe/“kutha”/6 year terrier mix)
(Billy, 2 year old feline)
The joke is they are called “kutha” “Billy” by my mom, but they are actually kuthiya & billa (Hindi for female dog & male cat, respectively).
When I say my mission is to
“get the Left-wing out of politics,”
that’s not an empty slogan.
The vision is based on my time “organizing” FOR @SEIU@AFSCME@UNITEHERE
& AGAiNST @NUHW.
The root cause? POWER;
ie “lack there of,”
but the glitch is not with the state.
♄ @LarryOConnor