Journalist: "You're selling raw milk at the farm gate. Unpasteurised. That's a public health hazard."
Dairyman: "What's pasteurising for?"
Journalist: "Killing dangerous bacteria."
Dairyman: "From where?"
Journalist: "The milk."
Dairyman: "The muck, the bucket and the cow. It came in when town milk was from sick cows in sheds behind the pub, carted warm for a day and topped up at the pump. They couldn't clean the dairy, so they cooked the milk."
Journalist: "And you think you're above all that."
Dairyman: "I think I'm inspected. The herd's TB tested. A man comes twice a year and goes through the parlour with a torch. The milk goes to a lab 4 times a year. One bad result and I'm shut that afternoon."
Journalist: "People have been made ill by raw milk."
Dairyman: "By dirty milk, same as dirty anything. 2 summers ago near 300 people in this country went down with E. coli. It was lettuce, out of a sandwich. How's the campaign against salad going?"
Journalist: "Salad doesn't carry the same risk."
Dairyman: "Salad doesn't carry a label. Every bottle I sell has a warning on it by law. Find me that on an energy drink, a vape or a bag of rocket."
Journalist: "So you accept it's risky."
Dairyman: "I accept I'm the only thing in your fridge that's been made to say so. My customers drive 40 minutes past 3 supermarkets, read the warning and buy 6 litres. Best-informed shoppers in Britain."
Journalist: "The experts advise against it."
Dairyman: "The experts advised margarine. People round here have drunk this for a few thousand years. I'll give the experts time to settle down."
@foundring1 Reminds me of this:
Associated Press photojournalist Richard Drew photographed the iconic "Falling Man" image during the September 11 attacks. He also famously photographed the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.
Welp here you go: We went from saying controlling the weather and cloud seeding is a “conspiracy theory” to ABC News doing an entire segment and facility tour of a cloud seeding company
“The mission to make billions of gallons of rain and snow, potentially combating drought and recovering lakes from record low levels using drones”
“What they do is they fly the drone into a cloud, then they disperse particles. Those particles help make it rain and snow. It's the latest in weather modification”
“The engineers at Rainmaker, a tech company in southern California, are hoping that this winter they'll make more rain and snow than ever before”
“They take a cloud that's not yet raining or snowing and then fly a drone like this into it. Out of this silver area comes trillions of molecules of silver iodide. That is an ice nucleating particle. So it's something like a magnet that attracts more water droplets. It's a process called cloud seeding, and it's not new.
These are the scientists, the American scientists, that invented cloud seeding back in 1945. The Department of Interior used to spend millions of dollars on cloud seeding trying to bring more water to the American West”
Our head of the EPA Lee Zeldin has specially called this exact method out as being very dangerous. He said the pounds of material they are injecting into the atmosphere rains down as acid rain and head health impacts that haven’t been studied
Also the scale of what they want to do is massive. The company says either just 3 drones they can cause 40 million pounds of rain to rain down
This is a recipe for disaster
Aaron Rodgers: “Every conspiracy that we were getting ridiculed for, it’s all been proven true.”
“Politics is a total sham.”
“The government’s a uniparty.”
“They don’t give a fuck about regular people.”
“If voting actually mattered, they wouldn’t let you do it.”
“Trump gets into office running on all these policies.”
“He’s going to go after the swamp.”
“And go into Fort Knox.”
“And cut the vaccine stuff.”
“And not go into foreign wars.”
“And end the Ukraine stuff.”
“And transparency in the Epstein files.”
“And what’s actually happened?”
“Absolutely nothing.”
“This is a pro-Israel first administration.”
“And when you dig into it, that’s the uniparty.”
“How many members of Congress are sponsored by AIPAC?”
“There’s no MAGA movement.”
“The guy you elected hasn’t done any of his campaign promises.”
“Politics is a crazy psyop.”
@AaronRodgers12@CamHeyward@NotJustFootball
You want to know what actual free speech looks like in the American context?
Edward Snowden told the truth about what the government was doing to its own citizens.
He is in exile.
Chelsea Manning told the truth about what the military was doing in Iraq, including footage of a helicopter crew killing journalists and laughing.
She was imprisoned.
Julian Assange published documents showing the gap between what Western governments said and what they did.
He spent years in an embassy and then a prison, and the country that lectures the world about press freedom led the effort to destroy him.
Meanwhile the people who lied about weapons of mass destruction and launched a war that killed hundreds of thousands:
They are on the speaking circuit.
They are on television as analysts.
They have libraries named after them.
This is not a paradox. This is the system working correctly.
Free speech, in the empire's operating definition, means you can say anything that doesn't threaten the machine.
The moment the speech has real consequences for real power:
You discover exactly how free it is.
ANOTHER BOMBSHELL: Independent journalist @anthonyjrubin catches Minnesota polling workers saying “If you’re vouching for them they wouldn’t need to show anything.”
This is the third report “The Justice League” team has released on the Minnesota vouching law…
Sometimes, I think we’re missing the forest for the trees.
Medical Establishment: We’ve never had better tools to help treat cancer!
Me: That’s great. But why do are so many people getting cancer?
Medical Establishment: There are amazing medicines to treat the millions with immune disorders!
Me: Terrific. But why do so many people have immune disorders?
Medical Establishment: There are new and better treatments for so many mental illnesses today!
Me: Okay, but why do so many people have mental illness?
Medical Establishment: We’re learning some of the secrets to correcting metabolic disorders!
Me: Good news. But why do so many people have metabolic disorders?
Medical Establishment: We’re cracking the code to help fix gut health!
Me: Important. But why are so many people’s guts messed up?
Medical Establishment: We’re devoting more resources than ever to figuring out how to mitigate side effects from treatments for trans people!
Me: Bravo. But why do so many girls say they’re boys, and boys say they’re girls?
Medical Establishment: We’ve made great strides in acceptance of obese people.
Me: Cool. But shouldn’t we tackle the issues making so many Americans overweight?
Medical Establishment: We have great options for injections for people who can’t absorb B12 and Vitamin D!
Me: Nice. But why are so many people not able to absorb B12 and Vitamin D?
Medical Establishment: We’re figuring out what diet and therapies really work for autistic kids.
Me: Yeah— but why do so many kids have autism?
What if we really studied and addressed root causes and it ended up solving a lot of these same issues?
On January 1, 2024 there were 440 flock cameras in the US.
One year later that number was up 10x to 4,511
In January of this year it had increased another 12x to 54,072
And in just the last 8 months it has ballooned to almost 129,000
They are building a surveillance prison in realtime at lightning speed and anyone trying to convince you this is a nothingburger is either grossly incompetent or a very bad actor.
🚨 BREAKING: This week the American Academy of Pediatrics — the group that shapes the childhood vaccine schedule — told the country it's "neutral."
Their words: "we go by science, not politics."
So I pulled their tax records. Here's who actually pays them..
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) runs on ~$138 MILLION a year.
Its corporate "partners" — $50,000+ donors — include the vaccine makers themselves:
Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi.
Source: their own IRS Form 990
On one AAP COVID-19 vaccine policy, the science outlet Undark found 9 of 16 committee members had taken money from vaccine manufacturers.
The published guideline said: "no potential conflicts."
9 of 16. They wrote "none."
And this isn't unique to the AAP — it's the pattern.
Peer-reviewed, JAMA Internal Medicine (2018): 57% of authors of clinical guidelines for high-revenue drugs had financial ties to the makers — and 1 in 4
payments were undisclosed.
The science documents the conflict of interest.
The AAP doesn't just take the money — it lobbies.
It keeps a full-time, four-person federal lobbying team and reported ~$789,000 in lobbying in a single quarter of 2026.
Ask why a "neutral" group of children's doctors needs its own lobby shop.
Same playbook, different drug.
AAP's 2023 childhood obesity guidelines urged doctors to consider weight-loss drugs for kids. 10 of the authors had taken money from those drug companies.
Disclosed in the guideline? No.
In 2011 the Gates Foundation paid the AAP $1,419,200 — in the Foundation's own words — "to organize and facilitate immunization education and advocacy
efforts among pediatricians."
Paid to advocate.
Why it matters: in 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits.
Since then a federal program has paid ~$5.5 BILLION for vaccine injuries (HRSA).
The makers are protected. The group promoting the schedule takes their money.
The question every parent deserves answered: is the group that calls itself "neutral" being paid by the companies that profit from the schedule?
The documents say yes.
If you want the documents mainstream accounts won't show you, follow
@therealisticrn.
I'm a nurse. I bring receipts, not fear.
JUST IN: new peer-reviewed research finds Bitcoin mining has the capacity to absorb 83% of the wind Ireland is forced to throw away, lifting wind farm revenues by 32%.
The paper is a wake-up call for grid operators, regulators and political leaders around the world whose grids are wasting large quantities of renewable energy, because the paper includes a head-to-head comparison with battery, finding 2 significant advantages, both which matter to the taxpayer.
1. No subsidy required:
"Compared with battery storage, hydrogen electrolysis, or transmission reinforcement, the co-investment is privately financed and operationally market-driven" and "...without requiring physical network upgrades or regulatory subsidy."
2. No performance degradation
"Unlike battery storage, mining incurs no round-trip efficiency losses or cycle degradation; unlike hydrogen electrolysis, it requires no downstream offtake infrastructure."
In layman's terms, this means that a battery gives back less power than it takes, and wears out with every cycle - whereas hydrogen needs a pipeline and a buyer at the far end. Bitcoin mining simply pays to use otherwise wasted power on the spot and needs nothing more after that.
Plus, Batteries, hydrogen and new wires are all paid for by the public. Bitcoin mining, uniquely, isn't.
To summarize: Together with previous papers on renewable energy monetization using Bitcoin mining, this technology is looking increasingly like the only tax-neutral way to keep renewable energy transition targets on track (or get them back on track).
The finding puts even more pressure on Ireland's neighbour, the UK, which continues to waste significant amounts of wind energy, to properly evaluate Bitcoin mining.
source: https://t.co/b2mhCXokxZ
This paper is doubly-significant because prior studies were done on deregulated grids like ERCOT (Texas). This study shows that Bitcoin mining's benefits extend to islanded regulated grids with high renewable penetration.
The study comes at a time where Ireland is currently wasting11.4% of its available wind (source: https://t.co/qMSwfoL9Wk). Its Climate Action Plan targets <7% curtailment by 2030. But an independent estimate says it's currently going in the opposite direction, projected to increase to16% by 2030, even with storage and demand response built (source: https://t.co/vIBZxhUS33).
The paper is published in Energy Economics which has an impact factor of 13.5 (top 2% of academic journals)
Source: https://t.co/BE5fj0iYdz
Seedless fruit is just part of the agenda. It’s symbolic.
They want YOU seedless too.
I planted my own vineyard, so I could have seeded grapes.
Time to bring back control of our own food and bodies.
Bayer, the pharmaceutical company, is sponsoring health influencers to say that glyphosate isn’t so bad.
I’m not kidding.
So let me de-influence you from the glyphosate propaganda clown show:
In animal studies, they found it can cause increased rates of certain tumors, reproductive toxicity, developmental abnormalities, liver damage, and more.
It’s even labeled “probably carcinogenic” to humans.
I wonder if it can do all of that to animals, what it can possibly do to us?
And people want to defend spraying our food with this? Come on now.
Seriously, if I ever come on here saying glyphosate isn’t so bad. Just know I sold my soul.
But I never will, so here I am telling you this!!
@dbookownsyou This is one of the plays I go back to in that series. Book, going against one of his former vets, down 1, game on the line. Always thought Book should have risen up for a midrange shot and lived with the results. Crazy to see this alternate reality.
Nocoiners are gloating
Shitcoiners in shambles
Fiat press churning out the stupid think pieces on why this really is the end of bitcoin
We're halfway between halvings
It's time to stack sats like your life depends on it
Nothing beats being in tune with the cycles of nature
Many hear of ‘Noah’s Ark’ and laugh it off
However, I think it goes far beyond “coincidence” that not only is this located on Mt. Ararat in Turkey, (exactly where Genesis 8:4 says it’s located)…
But it’s also virtually the same exact measurement of what the Bible described!