@GarryPNolan Big true!! @AnthropicAI — in addition it’s pushing regular people from using it because it’s become unaffordable. This is becoming a tool only the rich are going to be able to afford.
Been using Fable for some perfectly reasonable, non-biology, physics work. It has been doing amazing work so far for me.
I'm a professor of Pathology at Stanford... working in cancer biology. Not developing megawatt laser weapons, not hacking quantum computer encryption, not doing anything nefarious except working on techniques for measuring things at the atomic level. My eventual bio-goal is the 3D dynamic code of DNA and how it relates to immune-cancer outcomes.
Suddenly, Fable decides to hit a safety guardrail when it's almost finished (after 6 hours of work), after spending $100s of my credits. It terminates and forces me to hand over to Opus 4.8 or Sol. It doesn't even tell me "why" it hit a safety guard, so you could potentially protest or alter queries in the future.
So now I am left wondering how "dumbed down" the result will be?
And Anthropic wonders why their reputation continues to be sullied.
Anthropic-- I want my credits back! @anthropicAI
A very happy 250th Independence Day celebration to everyone. Excited to share that the Vanguard Enterprise has launched. Expect to hear more in the coming weeks and months. Good things are coming!
It has been a tremendous struggle for @TheDylanBorland and I to get to this point, and we must thank our silent team of volunteers who have helped make this dream a reality. Thank you! We could not have done this without you.
Today, on the 250th anniversary of our nation, we launch the Vanguard Enterprise.
For decades, Americans inside the national security enterprise have carried knowledge of extraordinary public consequence. Some have come forward lawfully. Many have paid a terrible price.
Washington has many systems for protecting secrets.
Vanguard is building one for protecting the people who tell the truth.
Founded by UAP whistleblowers Dylan Borland and Matthew Brown, Vanguard is a civilian-led 501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on UAP whistleblower support, public education, and lawful disclosure.
Our mission is simple: protect the whistleblowers, disclose the truth, and ensure that no warrior for the truth is left behind.
Learn more: https://t.co/gXqa7gsd7P
Decided to make a full, downloadable acronym list inspired by the work of @UFO_Technology last week!
I understand I use a tremendous amount of acronyms in my projects, sometimes bordering on absurdity. I also understand that often people voice they can have trouble keeping up with all the acronyms!
When discussing DOD/IC projects, programs, terminology, contracts, etc, it is far more efficient to utilize acronyms over full term definitions.
So bear with me and hope this list helps for quick referencing of various terms, organized as best as possible. Plan to periodically update the list, but attached are images and a PDF of my most commonly used acronyms.
#ufoX #ufo #Uap #uapX
"They don't appear interested in contact. They appear interested in monitoring us."
@I_D_Official joins me for a near 3 hour conversation covering UFO files, disclosure, USOs, AI, alien behaviour and what the phenomenon may actually be doing.
📺 Today:
🇬🇧 6pm UK
🇺🇸 1pm ET
🇺🇸 10am PT
This is one of the deepest conversations I've had on the topic.
https://t.co/1ykBP6gPSm
@JeremyCorbell@AmericanALCHMY
Remember that one time catastrophic disclosure could not be confirmed or denied legally to prevent a whistleblower from getting killed for treason?
To the UFO community, please wake up to what has occurred around you the last month.
We're talking about power sources leaked from whistleblower testimony.
Please, for the love of God, family, country, ask ODNI, CIA, AARO, ICIG to clarify.
As of this time, NO ONE has asked or reported their statements.
Sorry, feeling spicy 🌶
Mr. Mellon,
While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...
You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.
The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.
This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.
Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.
So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....
You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."
https://t.co/Bnin6fajhK
This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.
At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.
Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?
An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:
https://t.co/gAD3Lv6R6V
Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?
The other day I was asked by an Administration official what my priorities would be for release of UAP information. I replied as follows:
1) UAP Space Data
UAP detected in space, either in orbit or entering and departing the Earth’s atmosphere. I believe we have such data yet nothing of this kind has been released. We have numerous systems performing space surveillance, including the world’s most powerful radars. The power, sophistication and range of those systems leads me to believe they must inevitably collect and track UAP.
2) Satellite Data
This is another category of UAP data that has not been released to date. I’ve seen some of this imagery and what I’ve seen was impressive. Although typically highly classified, under present circumstances, with pressure from the White House, it may well be possible to release some or all of this overhead UAP data.
3) UAP Data from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System
The old Ballistic Missile Early Warning System has been continuously updated since the end of the Cold War to its current condition. These are believed to be the most powerful emitters on the planet. Further, numerous UAP encounters have clearly occurred within their areas of coverage. For example, during the Nimitz incident numerous UAP were descending from roughly 80,000 ft to 20,000 feet, in mere seconds, for several days, directly in front of the powerful strategic radar at Beale Air Force Base. Yet, none of this data has been released. Data from each of these systems could appreciably add to our knowledge of the UAP phenomenon.
I’m hoping they have the latitude and determination needed to come clean with this information.
From today's Third Release of the UAP Files under PURSUE:
"The Director of Intelligence, U.S. Air Force has informed the Navy Department that a cycle of reappearance of 'Flying Discs' is becoming apparent, and that the beginning of a new interval is imminent. They have requested that any such sightings be reported as quickly as possible, and that these phenomena be investigated."
This 1948 document is a memorandum from the Commandant of the 5th Naval District, and it cites a memorandum related to "flying discs" from the Chief of Naval Operations. The memorandum requests that naval stations report incidents to the nearest Air Force command and to the Naval District Intelligence Office.
Read More: https://t.co/z09WxBgM06
I am told @POTUS is indeed now briefed on the legacy UAP crash retrieval program. The President, @marcorubio, @RepLuna, @RepEricBurlison & @timburchett have pushed hard for the answers that other Presidents failed to get. The big Q is what POTUS will tell the American public now he knows what's happening. President Trump knows much more now than the original UAPTF brief sent to the White House in his first term.