@miumiuf1y your body will be the exact same, you will still look the exact same(maybe a bit bloated) but your scale will tell you you gained 3-4lbs
carbs and salt pull water into your tissues making you gain weight but not fat
@miumiuf1y 100% fake weight then, if you eat very little and then have a bigger carb meal (carbs being the important thing) together with higher sodium intake that day, you can gain multiple pounds of just water weight, 0 fat, just water
@firstLast31415@mightydudbolt Her reasoning: She had a picture hiking around a forest near my house and wanted to find out if she lived close because then it would be so easy to go on a date
When I told my friend to put herself in her shoes she instantly understood how creepy it was
@cd_g123@zukunft37 ich weiร nicht wem du versuchst zu รผberzeugen, ich hab nur etfs wie schon gesagt
der typ oben will die konservativste methode zu investieren, das sind anleihen
oder stimmt du nicht zu?
@cd_g123@zukunft37 ich bin voll in etfs weil ich das risiko tragen kann (mir ist egal wo der markt in 10 jahren ist, ich bin erst 22 und kann warten), wenn du aber rentner bist ist dir das risiko nach unten wichtiger als die rendite nach oben
anleihen sind da ein ziemlich perfektes tool
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD also btw, this doesnt always turn out bad, youtube was a loss leader for over 10years, losing investers more than a few billion dollars, and i still think we can both agree it was a very good product in the end
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD after 15 years of unprofitability. so yea, its mostly netflix racking it in and other companies taking losses in hopes of taking its place
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD i had to recheck btw, netflix has been profitable for 20+ years, they only lost money in the first 3 years of business. paramount has been a loss leader for ever(hasnt ever been profitable until now), disney+ und hulu managed to turn profitable just 2 years ago
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD another perfect example of this is AI, complete loss leader for any company that has invested into it, however you will almost always find another 100 billion dollars coming out of nowhere to keep it afloat
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD I agree with you lol, those companies will also go bankrupt once investments stop but this has less to do with competition and more with investors willing to supply cash to a losing company in hopes that it becomes the next biggest thing (like netflix)
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD those prices were always only temporary to anyone with a brain, because no business will ever continue to just lose money for no reason. they might lose money to increase customers(oss leader), but once the extra subscrition stop, they will increase prices to match profitability
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD they only gave you those low prices to make you start using the service, because paying customers are more likely to keep paying even if the prices increase. (the reason they ever had to start with prices so low was COMPETITION btw! the thing you are shit talking)
@flobries@Elesoterik@Alonso_GD Pretty much competition was the thing that gave us those low prices in the first place, or youtube/netflix/uber/lyft wouldve never accepted years of unprofitability.