Anurag Gupta

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

Grand Symphony of C, Java and Python

Imagine a grand symphony of programming languages, each with its own unique melody, rhythm, and soul. Let’s weave a tale of C, Java, and Python—three distinct voices in this orchestra, each singing to its own tune, yet harmonizing in the vast world of code.

C is the elder maestro, a language of raw power and precision. Born in the early 1970s, it’s like a finely crafted violin—elegant, demanding, and unyielding. With C, you hold the strings of memory and system resources in your hands, manually tuning every note. There’s no safety net, no gentle abstraction; it’s the language of operating systems and embedded devices, where control is paramount. Its syntax is terse, its performance blazing, but it asks for discipline—a steady hand to avoid the dissonance of segmentation faults or memory leaks. C is the foundation, the bedrock upon which much of modern computing rests, a timeless classic that whispers, “With great power comes great responsibility.”

Java, emerging in the mid-1990s, is the noble conductor, balancing structure with grace. Picture it as a grand piano—versatile, sophisticated, and rich in tone. It takes C’s intensity and wraps it in a protective embrace, offering object-oriented harmony and a virtual machine that hums across platforms with the promise of “write once, run anywhere.” Java tames memory management with its garbage collector, shielding you from the raw chaos of pointers, yet it retains a disciplined cadence with its static typing and verbose syntax. It’s the language of enterprise, of Android apps and sprawling servers, a steadfast companion that sings of reliability and scalability, though its formality can feel like a stately waltz—beautiful, yet measured.

Then there’s Python, the youthful poet, born in the late 1980s but blooming in the modern era. It’s a flowing flute—light, expressive, and effortlessly melodic. Python strips away the rigid armor of braces and semicolons, offering a syntax so clean it feels like prose. It’s dynamic, forgiving, and invites you to dance with ideas rather than wrestle with machinery. With its vast libraries, Python conjures data science, machine learning, and web wonders with a flick of its wrist. Yet, this freedom comes at a cost—its interpretive nature trades speed for flexibility, making it less suited to the raw performance demands of system-level tasks. Python is the language of creation, a muse that whispers, “Let’s make something beautiful, fast.”

In their essence: C is the craftsman’s chisel, carving raw stone with precision; Java is the architect’s blueprint, building towering structures with care; and Python is the artist’s brush, painting vibrant strokes with ease. Each shines in its domain, a testament to the beauty of diversity in the symphony of code. Which melody calls to you depends on the song you wish to play.

[Nick Collins @nickcollins1953]

Mesopotamia was never the cradle of civilisation. India was.

I spent forty years in international shipping, not academia. When I began researching the history of maritime trade, I had no orthodoxy to defend. I followed the evidence, and it kept arriving in the same place: the Indian subcontinent.

Nineteenth century archaeologists dug in Mesopotamia because the climate preserved artefacts, the biblical sources pointed them there, and the Ottomans allowed the excavations. That is the entire basis for the myth of Mesopotamia as "the cradle of civilisation."

Nobody applied the same rigour to India. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. By then the narrative had already hardened.

What was actually there was the largest civilisation of the ancient world. Three hundred cities. Fifty thousand people in each, by 2600 BC. Two thirds of them stood on the banks of the Sarasvati, the central and greatest of the seven rivers described in the Rig Veda, flowing down from the Himalayas before the river vanished entirely by 1900 BC. The Vedic kings claimed territory stretching "sea to sea," from Afghanistan to Maharashtra, some 1.5 million square miles, against Egypt's 13,000. A dock at Lothal built to handle thirty ships of sixty tons, unmatched in Europe for four thousand years. When it was first excavated, it was recorded as a bathing pool.

When the scale became impossible to dismiss, the theory was not corrected. It was replaced with a story of pale-skinned nomads from the steppe who supposedly arrived around 1500 BC and brought civilisation with them. There is no evidence. The chronology doesn't work. The Vedas describe no invasion.

In 2019 a Harvard-led genetic study revived the claim, and the press reported it as confirmation. It was not. The same study found the builders of these cities were indigenous. The Sarasvati river that the Rig Veda described had already dried up before these newcomers arrived. What the study also found is that a small group of men, arriving after the Sarasvati had already dried up, interbred with the existing population and left a genetic signature. That is all.

So, where they chose to dig was mostly an accident of climate and access. The Aryan invasion theory was constructed because an Indian civilisation that owed nothing to Caucasians was a fact the late nineteenth century could not accommodate.

Link to full Substack essay with sources in the comments below.

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@version0chiro

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@philosophymeme0

[Aarthi Ramamurthy @aarthir]

Agentic this, agentic that.
Agentic just means AI using AI. Sometimes it's calling the same model recursively. Sometimes it's routing to a different model that's better at the sub-task. Sometimes it's hitting a tool that wraps a model underneath. That's kinda it, really.

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@odradesh Heisenberg

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@nightbeatsdrop

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@AdityaRajKaul @narendramodi न भूतो न भविष्यति ।

[memes.xlsx @ExcelHumor]

using Claude to write a vlookup in excel

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@rxendy

[Valeriy M., PhD, MBA, CQF @predict_addict]

I know you always wanted to learn to extract square roots by hand.

So I built an app for it to practice lost art.

Long before pocket calculators, Russian schoolchildren extracted square roots digit by digit using a procedure that's essentially long division in disguise.

Exact, pencil-and-paper, works for any positive integer.

The app walks you through A. P. Kiselev's classical algorithm step by step — group the digits, find the first root digit, double, estimate, test, subtract, bring down, repeat.

Four difficulty tiers (3-digit numbers up to 10-digit), guided digit-by-digit feedback, global leaderboard.

#math

[Rusty ⚡️: Solar Powered ☀️ @ze_rusty]

26 MILLION adults across the US, Australia and Canada are sick from Wireless RF radiation.

12.6% of the general population.

10% medically DIAGNOSED with EHS.

Of those sick:

84.8% also fragrance sensitive
80.6% also chemically sensitive
73.2% also asthmatic
53.8% also autistic

New peer-reviewed paper. Elsevier. 2026.

Still think it's in their heads?

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@defileo

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@Bhairavoham https://t.co/wDAVs4JAq8

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@bipinchauhan https://t.co/oUlbcsCvnj

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@odradesh Welcome to my YouTube channel

[Anurag Gupta @Techiebuff]

@Khanstillday

[Dr. Dominic Ng @DrDominicNg]

Unlike mothers, fathers tend to make children laugh by surprising them, breaking social rules, and making sudden funny noises.

This playful destabilisation in a safe context is linked to a stronger sense of attachment security.

[Cap-EO 👨🏾‍💻 @EOEboh]

Great question.
When you store passwords, you don't store them directly (that would be unsafe). Instead, you "hash" them. It is hashing that turns "password123" into something like "a7f8k2m9x4".

The problem is, if two people use "password123", they both get the same hash result. Hackers know this and have giant cheat sheets that say "if you see a7f8k2m9x4, the original password was password123."

The solution to this is "salting". Before hashing the password, you add some random junk to it.

So for User A, you might add "xyz" to their password, making it "password123xyz" before hashing.

For User B with the same password, you add different junk like "abc", making it "password123abc".

Now when hashed, they look completely different.

Benefits of salting is that even if a million people use "password123", every single one looks different in your database.

Hackers have to work much harder to crack each password individually

[AJAY DIXIT @AJAYDIXIT1975]

मेरा बेटा राघव अब तक नहीं मिला 16 अगस्त से लापता है। हर पल हम उसकी सुरक्षित वापसी की दुआ कर रहे हैं।🙏
आप सबसे निवेदन है – कृपया इस पोस्ट को शेयर करें। आपकी मदद हमारे बेटे को घर ला सकती है।

@CP_Noida @Uppolice @noidapolice @DCPCentralNoida @DCPGreaterNoida
@aajtak @ABPNews