Tracie Powell

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@SpeakerPelosi Looks who’s talkin, OTIS! 🤪

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@sfali789 @elonmusk Ohhhh so what you’re saying is that crime due to illegal immigration is ALSO a problem in OTHER countries, BUT U.S. media doesn’t share that?? This isn’t new info, sunshine!!! 🙄

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@ChrisDJackson @JoeBiden He was LITERALLY a vegetable and when he DID come out of the basement was shameful! 🤣

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@bluesamk @krassenstein I was “INTRODUCED” to Bret Michaels in 2005. He and Kristi had a new baby in tow (not pictured 🤣) at the time, but I don’t KNOW Bret Michaels. No scandal. Just a photo op. I met Oprah too in 1989, but that’s not share-worthy…Stop with your bullshit. 🙄

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@SpeakerPelosi Nobody CARES what you think or say. Cheers! 🍺🍻🥂🍹🍸🥃🍾🧉

[Victor Davis Hanson @VDHanson]

How To Destroy the American Legal System

By either listening to testimonies or reading transcripts of the various 2024 Trump election-related court cases and testimonies, what we are left with is an epidemic of lies.

1) Hunter Biden’s current testimonies are contradicted by his own text messages, bank records, phone records, and testimonies of some of his associates. Anytime he is trapped in inconsistencies, he falls back on his addiction. Translated, that means we are sometimes supposed to believe he is a Yale-trained lawyer, experienced corporate grandee, and skilled negotiator, and thus carefully avoided involving his father in the family’s various schemes. And then again, sometimes when the evidence is damning and overwhelming, he simply cannot remember, or claims he was addled at the time in question due to his medical “addiction”.

2) In the Georgia Trump case, lawyers Terence Bradley, Nathan Wade, and Prosecutor Fani Willis all testified under oath to events that are contradicted by either prior other witness testimonies, or their own previous statements, or electronic phone records, and thus, to square the record, either have claimed amnesia, ignorance, or larger racist forces at work. Two of the three are leading the effort to indict a former president and current leading candidate for the presidency on a racketeering charge never before used in a Georgia election interference case, and to be tried by prosecutors who have either zero experience in felony criminal cases or no experience in racketeering cases or both.

3) Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, ran for office on promises to use her office to go after Donald Trump. She used an obscure consumer fraud law to claim Trump overvalued assets to obtain a loan that was paid back with interest and on time to a bank that audited his financial statement prior to the loan and had zero complaints about its profitable loan after it was paid off. Trump now is fined $355 million for a crime that has no victim, and has lost control of his New York businesses to a court-appointed judge. No one in New York history has ever been tried under this statute for allegedly exaggerating assets to get a loan that was paid back and over which the lending agency had no complaints.

4) Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also boasted in his campaign for office he would go after Donald Trump. He is trying Trump on multiple felonies in a state court surrounding a supposed campaign finance violation over a nondisclosure agreement that the proper federal attorneys earlier felt did not merit prosecution.

5) Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is trying Trump for removing classified files to his estate at Mar-a-Lago. Note that twin special prosecutor Robert Hur found that President Biden also removed classified files to more and less secure residences for far longer (over 30 years) but as a senator and Vice President without Trump’s statutory presidential authority to declassify such documents. Biden admitted in 2017 he possessed such classified files and yet knowingly waited years to notify authorities. He did so only on the expectation that prosecutor Smith would soon indict Trump for the same alleged crime. Smith is also trying Trump on “insurrectionary” conduct despite Trump never having been charged in the prior three years by any federal or state authority for such an offense.

6) E. Jean Carrol (won $83.3 million in a “defamation” civil suit against Trump) won her case despite: 1) having no idea what year the alleged sexual assault took place some 30 years ago; 2) claiming she remembered the assault by the designer dress she wore that did not exist at the time; 3) advancing a narrative of events nearly identical to an episode of Law and Order that aired in 2012; 4) tweeting roughly two decades later that her supposed assailant’s TV show The Apprentice was one of her favorites; 5) her ELLE editor denying Carroll was fired from the magazine due to the Carroll-Trump dispute; 6) creating an app about how to break up couples through various machinations; 7) refiling her case beyond the statute of limitations, but only once a leftwing New York legislator strangely passed a bill allowing claimants of sexual abuse to have a one time, one year window to refile beyond the statute of limitations.

7) Blue or purple states such as Colorado, Illinois, and Maine are currently all attempting to remove Donald Trump from their presidential ballots on allegations of insurrectionary activity despite the fact he has never been convicted of any such charge and there is no precedent for such presidential disqualification.

8) Note the following: All the prosecutors, and litigants are either Democratic partisans or liberals. The trials have and will take place largely in Atlanta, New York, or Washington among leftwing prosecutors, judges, and jury pools. The majority of the charges and suits—the various states’ misuse of 14th Amendment, Bragg’s bootstrapping a state indictment onto a federal charge, James’s contortion of using a consumer fraud law to try Trump for a crime without a victim, Willis’s misuse of a racketeering statute to concoct an election interference charge, Carroll refiling once a leftwing jurist passed a special law that allowed her to do so postfacto, Smith’s effort to indict a president for insurrection and removing classified files—have either never been used before in these ways, or are in the wrong jurisdiction, or could equally apply to Democratic targets such as Joe Biden (found culpable by a special counsel but exempt by cognitive disability, named in various testimonies and texts as recipient of illicit foreign payments, accused of prior sexual assault), Hillary Clinton (fined for campaign finance violations), or Barack Obama (fined for campaign finance violations).

So what is the reason for all this lying, these legal contortions, and egregious prosecutor and judicial misbehavior?

Five simple facts alone:

1) The Left both fears and detests Donald Trump.

2) Donald Trump chose to run for the presidency in 2024.

3) Donald Trump is not a man of the Left.

4) Donald Trump is currently ahead of Joe Biden in both national polls and in the majority of swing state polls.

5) The Left feels barring Trump from the presidency is worth destroying 235 years of American jurisprudence.

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@SpeakerPelosi @FORMER @SpeakerPelosi I don’t think you’re sober enough to understand that NOBODY CARES what you say or do! Your shady and self-serving time in Congress getting rich off of citizens and inside information has deemed you irrelevant and likely criminal. Shut UP! MYOB🙄

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@bluesamk @KamalaHarris Except they’re NOT…. 😉

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@candiedmickey @ShadyWhiteDecon @dbongino Your employer chooses your coverage if you have insurance through them. Ask them why it’s crappy. 😉

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@SpeakerPelosi The paramount priority for ELECTED officials is to deal with these things. The priority for RETIRED insignificant and questionable former elected officials is not to expect that inserting your unsolicited opinion matters to anyone, because you never cared before, got rich & ✌🏼.

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@RealCandaceO Was this your plan all along to gain popularity then expect perfection & spew criticism when the reality of imperfection arises? Your stance lately is an alter-ego, but intelligent souls wonder why and what you expect to gain or regain by thwarting military enlistment? Truly. 🤔

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@60Minutes @NorahODonnell Norah Nobody, I truly hope that PRESIDENT TRUMP never graces you with his presence again! Your poorly veiled blatant disregard for the POTUS by addressing him as “Mr. Trump” is disgusting. It’s MR. PRESIDENT or PRESIDENT TRUMP to you and all your leftist cronies. Check yourself!

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@SenWarren You can’t be this stupid or libelous and have any brains. I hope you’re one of MANY FORCED to pay repercussions for twisting quotes and spewing blatant lies, because what you’re stating with your whole chest NEVER HAPPENED. If you have to twist the envelope, your words are BS.

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@KamalaHarris I’d rather read a cereal box!

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@JoJoFromJerz Prove him wrong then. Use that big ignorant mouth to fact check, or would that be too logical?

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@mmpadellan @Disney ABC didn’t “stand with Kimmel”, they drop kicked him out the door. They’re probably tired of paying out for leftist rhetoric and blatant lies. They just paid out 15 million in December. Wonder how much this is gonna cost them? 🤔

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@tab_delete Fact checkers prove this is straight BS.

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@chrislhayes Tell the world you are ignorant to Constitutional interpretation in one post. 😉

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@mdeperno @officedepot Why does he say “this is for someone who passed away a few years ago”? Is this old or new?

[Tracie Powell @Teepee105]

@ONABAMfan You didn’t “catch” anything but the exact backlash you deserve and NOT from the father and son. Grow TF up. 🙄