Remember when I said we should only look at output and quality. If you make good stuff, then people should not care if you do or don't use AI... Or how you use it, or when you use it...
How to become a hacker ethically.
1. Learn Networking - Understand IP addresses, ports, DNS, TCP/IP, and how networks work.
2. Master Linux - Get comfortable with the command line, especially Kali Linux.
3. Learn Programming - Start with Python, then explore Bash and basic JavaScript.
4. Understand Cybersecurity - Study vulnerabilities, web security, authentication, and common attacks.
5. Learn the Tools - Practice with Nmap, Wireshark, Burp Suite, and Metasploit.
6. Build a Home Lab - Practice safely using virtual machines and intentionally vulnerable applications.
7. Use Legal Platforms - Train on TryHackMe, Hack The Box, and PortSwigger Web Security Academy.
8. Build a Portfolio - Document your labs, write-ups, projects, and security findings.
9. Get Certified (if you’ve got the money) - Consider Security+, eJPT, or PNPT as you progress.
Stay Ethical & Never test systems without explicit authorization.
In Kenya a porn star named Lexi goes on a podcast. She talks about her life as a porn star.
women APPLAUDED her. "Queen!" "Empowering!" "Smart!" "Intelligent!" "Her body her choice!"
They didn’t care about the trauma. Shame. Suicidal thoughts. Broken family. Emptiness. Future Regrets.
In that SAME country, a woman creates a class to teach women how to be wives. How to keep a home. How to respect a husband. How to build a family.
10,000 COMMENTS. Attacks. Insults. "Pick me!" "Internalized misogyny!" "You're setting us back!"
So let’s be clear on what just happened:
The woman selling her body gets called brave. The woman teaching family gets called a traitor.
The woman who destroys herself gets a standing ovation. The woman who wants to build a home gets crucified.
Women celebrate what destroys, condemn what builds.they call one path empowering and brave, while mocking the other for upholding marriage, family, and responsibility.
And the most disturbing part? They are teaching the next generation of women what to admire, what to aspire to, and what to despise.
They are telling our daughters: Be naked for strangers and you are powerful. Be loyal to one man nor your family and you are stupid.
When women in a society starts applauding what undermines it and attacking what sustains it, they need to ask themselves : Have yall completely lost your moral compass?
The double standard is not a mistake. It’s the point. The rage is not about morals. It’s about agenda.
They don’t hate the housewife because she is wrong. They hate her because she proves their choices are not the only choices.
I’ve hacked every major crypto exchange. Reported critical vulnerabilities that would make the news if we disclosed.
If you are scared of holding your crypto in cold storage because of the Coldcard hack and is thinking you are better off holding in an exchange, I can tell you one thing with certainty.
Do not trust Binance. You WILL lose your funds.
No disrespect to Mr. Pavlovski, but this has been a "trend" for decades.
You just haven't been aware of the "trend" because you never focused on the "trend".
My website has documented these "trends" dating back to the early 2000s.
Mirip2 komparasi Oxford University sudah ada sebelum Majapahit lahir. Tar dikasih tahu 1355 di Oxford University itu lagi ada kerusuhan bunuh²an selama 3 hari antara Warga Oxford dan Mahasiswa Oxford University perkara anggur yang dijual di kedai rasanya asam, Pada ga terima 😆
Things that never happened - men defending rapists
Things that happened - women donated 1M$ to a criminal who killed 3 toddlers just bcz she was a "Women"
Former CIA officer John Kiriakou, on Indonesia 1965 :
> "they literally crafted this narrative that was absolutely untrue, that a Communist Party was going to rise up and kill everyone"
> "military ended up clashing with the Communist Party in Indonesia and one million people died"
> "Several documents of the CIA actually say that it was a model of an operation"
The CIA's own 1968 research study called the killings "one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century". The agency knew exactly what it was looking at.
Then Washington backed Suharto for 32 years.
I keep coming back to this one because it's the case that shaped everything after it, from Chile to the colour revolutions of today.
If the people who ran it called it a success, what exactly were they measuring ?
@StephanieClar1@foxtrotvlrt The random-effects pooled prevalence estimate of prison-based physical victimization was 18.8%,with slightly higher rates for females(20.3%) than males(18.1%).For sexual victimization,the pooled prevalence estimate was 12.4%,with higher rates among females (15.3%)than males(9.7%)