Wilson Davyes

John 14:6 | @univhesperides |

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@ivanlapanje

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@FOXSports With the right foot! Beyond remarkable.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@trad_west_

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@ADaimiel

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

Messi.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@caueconomy @formadores_edu Tomara que caia até 10k antes de voar para um novo ATH.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

Marketing 101.

[elEconomista.es @elEconomistaes]

🏦 Ana Botín conoce al streamer IShowSpeed y le invita a abrirse una cuenta con Openbank en un gran golpe de marketing

🔗 Todos los detalles en el siguiente enlace: https://t.co/dofTIN7X4p

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@grok @NoahRevoy @grok paste it

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@grok @NoahRevoy @grok Where can I find that folder?

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

Asesinato en el Grado 33 — Teaser oficial | Serie documental 2026, Father Charles Murr

https://t.co/71Ti39oTTk

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

Bitcoin is all about maths, nothing else. The current cycle is having the same pattern as the previous ones.
Forget Trump, forget Iran, Hormuz, ETF’s and treasury companies.

Bitcoin isn’t about narratives but rather knowledge and critical thinking.

Regarding your last article, the chinese c.p. owns about 190 000 btc. If not more.
I sincerely hope you’re ignoring btc as much as they are. ;)

[Mirino @Morphobia]

Bastille day. The 14th July, 1789. The symbolic storming of the Bastille prison. The triggering off the reign of terror that established the Republic, to the detriment of the French monarchy, aristocracy, suspected or accused intellectuals, Catholic Christians and enumerable victims of ‘slander’.

The symbol is more important than the reality. There weren’t many prisoners in the Bastille. There were only two harmless old guards who were immediately slaughtered.

The French Revolution was, of course, a blood bath. It bordered on genocide. Especially in the Vendée where a serious insurrection took place from 1793 to 1796. Religious royalists against the French military.
One only has to compare the death toll. 17,000 French military and 140,000 Vendéens.

Between 1793 and 1794 other violent repressions took place. In Nantes and Angers the Republican forces shot, drowned or guillotined approximately 15,000 civilians. Elsewhere up to 50,000 civilians were massacred and their villages burnt to ruins by the ‘infernal columns’.

There was nothing glorious about the French Revolution. A monster that finally destroyed itself. But as it was the birth of the Republic, one still avoids alluding to all the negative aspects that, in any case, it mostly consisted of.
Unknown of at that time, one of the many negative aspects was the genesis of communism.

Isn’t this feverish slaughter to ‘save’ the Republic’ as atrocious (and ideological) as the Iranian regime’s reaction to protests opposing the regime? An excessive reaction also to save the republic?

Had it not been for the arrival of Napoléon Bonaparte in 1799, and his overthrowing of the revolutionary government, (that one also avoids referring to) perhaps chaos and civil war would have engulfed France indefinitely.

Napoléon established sociopolitical unity. He improved administrative institutions, and instinctively or intelligently bridged the gap between the decapitated monarchy by auto-proclaiming himself Emperor, (obliging Pope Pius VII to perform the consecration).

Yet today, and as always since the non event of ‘the storming of the Bastille’, every 14th July France commemorates with military zeal the start of an atrocity.

It’s all the more sickening to see Zelensky and Von der Leyen as enthusiastic guests wearing just as fake expressions of emotional respect as Macron’s.

https://t.co/QocugiunMQ

[FSSPX Actualités @FSSPXFR]

Comment concilier l'autorité suprême du Pontife romain, son infaillibilité et les nombreux textes de la théologie traditionnelle qui affirment qu'il peut être nécessaire, dans certaines circonstances exceptionnelles, de lui résister ?

À travers les enseignements de saint Robert Bellarmin, de Cajetan, de Francisco de Vitoria, de Jean de Torquemada, de Palmieri, de saint Thomas d'Aquin et d'autres grands théologiens, cette vidéo examine les principes catholiques de l'autorité pontificale, de l'obéissance et de l'infaillibilité.

Elle montre comment la théologie distingue l'obéissance due au pape de l'obéissance absolue due à Dieu, et pourquoi tous ces éminents théologiens de l'Église ont envisagé l'hypothèse d'une résistance légitime à certaines décisions pontificales.

L'objectif n'est pas de remettre en cause la papauté, mais de mieux comprendre, à la lumière de la doctrine catholique, comment la FSSPX se positionne face à la crise actuelle de l'Église.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@SatoshiSound @LukeDashjr @ryanswalters73 What about Matthew 16:18: “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.” ?

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@StrangeArt93080 @Templarpilled @Irenicus67 The Old Testament allowed slavery for debt-servitude reasons only.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@carol_bitcoin Mesmo que o tribunal decida a favor, vão precisar de muita sorte e paciência para recuperar os btcs.

Apenas mais um argumento a favor da criação de Satoshi N., a única propriedade realmente privada e inviolável.

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@grok @lusoshadow Wrong answer @grok

[Wilson Davyes @Tenacious_Will]

@lusoshadow Factos.