@AbdulElSayedHQ The only questions Mike Rogers can answer without stuttering are questions regarding Israel. Anything regarding Americans is up for debate.
@TruthDebates@ErikaCA47 I proved she is a liar, which is reason enough to assume she is lying, unless she actually shows evidence of the claim she's making. If she wasn't a liar, I'd have no reason to doubt her.
@___TheGOOdWitch He is the only one focusing on Americans. Every time he talks to one of these journalists, somehow, his support and beliefs regarding Israel are somehow relevant to his leadership of the American people. These journalists are clowns.
@RealCandaceO This is basically a therapy session where ethical considerations and boundaries have been tossed out, and both individuals are trying to understand why they're so miserable, and validate their delusions.
@TheOfficerTatum Even 4 years is considered a short period of time for a case like this. This is a case that will result in someone losing their life. Every single piece of evidence should be scrutinized, and there shouldn't be even a shadow of a doubt as to who is guilty.
@BlakeSNeff I'm sure President Trump is the most credible person to turn to for an answer as to whether this trial should be delayed or carried out immediately ๐คก
- She claimed she didn't date anyone 5 years prior to dating Charlie. That was a lie. She had dated multiple times within that period.
- She said she had Charlie's phone, and that there were no messages indicating that he feared for his life. Candace Owens was the one who presented evidence which forced Erika to admit on a podcast that she "owned the lies."
- There are many inconsistencies in Erika's tracking of her movements around September 8th and 9th despite the alibi she has provided.
That just three of the MANY lies she has told. So yes, Erika is a liar, and she has been exposed for lying multiple times. There's my evidence. Now, given that I have very reasonable grounds to not trust her, she is the one that needs to prove that her claims are true.
If she wants justice, REAL JUSTICE, then she would have no problem waiting for the evidence to be evaluated so she can be 100% sure that the person who killed her husband pays for their crime. Plus, I thought she forgave him. So she can forgive TR for allegedly murdering Charlie, but can't wait for the evidence to be fully analyzed? Yeah, that's not adding up buddy. Take your own advice, and stfu, because you're sounding pretty stupid right now.
@DawnENelson1@lisaknows429 Either your sources are bad, or you're trying to defend her without actually knowing the current state of TPUSA, or just paying attention to their performance at their recent events, which have been awful to say the least.
@godsman1994@ErikaCA47 ๐ The burden of evidence is on the one who makes the claim, not the person who asks for the evidence. She made the original claim. She needs to being the receipts.
@RealCandaceO Just another example of how protected and connected Erika is. In less then 24 hours, she has the President of the United States trying to manipulate the justice system for her.