@adbertram @timmitwiser I suppose it would be useful for cases were you need the property of a variable, like
"Process name: $($Process.ProcessName)"
Could be:
"Process Name: {0}" -f $Process.ProcessName
@IanWBoyle@thehelpdeskgirl Pretty much. It's just a matter of having the initial knowledge needed to be able to interpret the knowledge bases, articles, or forums you happen to find.
@adequatejack@sysadafterdark Not in the case of Brave, one very good reason to use Brave over Chrome is the lack of ads. The same "could" be done with extensions, but Brave does it more efficiently being native to the browser. Less items to load per page = more RAM to utilize for other tasks
@ElieZailah@Ralshi03@Taoufik_Miri@WindowsLatest They might need to optimize design to reduce the feel of clutter in the next few years, since the primary reason for it is that they are trying to remove the legacy control panel. As you probably are aware, control panel houses a lot of stuff
@iamemiranda@manelrodero@onedrive If that works, it might be worth loading the default user's hku hive in an offline image. Then modify that value and unload the hive. That should make it so any new users get the same change.
@MaryGKeller @day_nft_io @ChrisJBakke I mean, yes. But let's apply your example to flowers. There are several species that are almost identical to the untrained eye. Now you need to know which ones you are accurately recognizing.
What's the accuracy rate of this model, and how do we know it's consistent?
@mhofela_mhofu@tafadzwamarere@JohnAmericaUSA@StephenKing The point of the check is to remove the bot problem. So the interpretation is that you basically don't have a valid opinion if you don't have a blue check. Just another form of elitism when the advertisement is for "free speech"
@dallasirushing@JamesDeBLK@grandoldmemes@elonmusk And letting Twitter get away with it will just prompt other social media to do the same. Soon you'll be spending $90 a month on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Snapchat, etc. As if streaming services didn't do this enough already...
@SeguraOSD Ah, my bad. I don't remember the exact error, but it was that the "root" parameter of new-psdrive couldn't convert [string[]] to [string], when there are multiple shares
@SeguraOSD Not the best screenshot, but I can get a better one tomorrow if you'd like. Did this one at work on our test share. I kind of think the else statement could use some error-handling for null or invalid paths, though.
@SeguraOSD Hi, I set this up in my environment (yet to deploy. Probably tomorrow)
One thing worth mentioning, is that get-MDTPersistentDrive returns an array if there are multiple shares. So creating a psdrive fails. I ended up making a "share" parameter to hardcode, if needed