@inatodoseiji@_FREEx99@MoistCr1TiKaL You are literally just wrong on this though. His friends and family said he was left-wing. He wrote "Fascist, catch" on a bullet. The idea he was killed for not being right-wing enough is unimaginably retarded. Next time do the bare minimum of research before demanding others.
@linusmilz@ChewBakaNiiSan@TrU3Ta1ent Statistically right-wingers are getting married way more, this seems like a bit of confession through projection methinks
Don't worry champ, you'll find someone eventually
@linusmilz@Drevorubac420@TrU3Ta1ent Uh? You didn't post a video, lol.
You are deeply propagandized dude. All you can do is fly into an incoherent fit whenever something contradicts your baseless assertions.
It's not surprising you wanted the "debate me" guy gone considering how fucking bad you are at arguing
@cornrowballs @DrexinFFXIV @RileyParka @jamiespewscrap@DarkOddCon The "crimes" were felonies for false business records, and in actuality they were misdemeanors that were already past the statute of limitations. So no, you don't even have that. Even if he did falsify records he's not guilty of what he was prosecuted for.
@DrexinFFXIV @RileyParka @jamiespewscrap@DarkOddCon ...Why? It has nothing to do with the claim, lol. The claim is that the prosecution against him was politically-motivated and full of holes. You need to deflect to this shit about Trump's character because you have no response.
@Praeconius@stupidcatcher@OrderAutist@DarkOddCon If this contribution charge actually held water, the prosecution would've focused on it instead of throwing it up in the air along with 2 or 3 others they did nothing to prove.
How would campaign donation limits even apply here? The allegation is never explained.
@cornrowballs @DrexinFFXIV @RileyParka @jamiespewscrap@DarkOddCon Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor in the hush money case, literally campaigned on taking down Trump because he's Trump. And the SCOTUS ruling had nothing to do with the hush money case and does not apply to it. You're clueless as to what you're talking about.
@kvosoul@pleasantmilksh1 @RileyParka @jamiespewscrap@DarkOddCon He doesn't, you're just uninformed. The SCOTUS immunity ruling only applies to acts carried out as president toward an end that is within their explicit authority as defined in the constitution.
@redelecbeanz @RileyParka @jamiespewscrap@DarkOddCon It's been like 4 years and you people still haven't produced a single point where Trump encouraged people to break into gov buildings nor the missing link between an unscheduled tour of the capital and a regime change