Two things caught my attention this weekend. An All-In episode and a HubSpot post, both circling the same reassurance. AI will not replace humans.
I read the HubSpot one coming back from a 4am airport run, in a car that drove the whole way while I sat behind a wheel I never touched. My one input was moving it from Chill to Standard mode.
So I sat with the claim. They are right, in the narrow sense. FSD did not replace me. I was in the seat. I set the mode. But it proved the harder thing. You do not need many people once the job itself is handled. The shift that took five now takes one to supervise. The headcount just falls out the bottom.
Point that out and the reassurance arrives on cue. Jevons. Progress makes new work. Cheaper output expands demand. Everyone reabsorbed into a bigger pie.
That is the part nobody says. Jevons only saves the jobs if people want far more of the thing once it gets cheap. More code. More content. More interactions you could never afford before. There the pie grows and the team grows with it.
Most enterprise work is not like that. Nobody files ten times more support tickets because handling got cheap. The same queue just gets cleared for less. Demand does not move. The capacity just frees up and stays free.
Elastic demand, the team holds. Inelastic demand, the team shrinks. That is the whole equation. So the honest question was never whether AI replaces people. It is which side of the elasticity line your function sits on.
#AI #Disruption #Job #EnterpriseAI
Computers as we know it is going to be obsolete soon. Why should I lookup a dashboard when it should synthesize the results and give me the results as sound. This is going to start a wave of new devices