@BulwarkOnline@BillCassidy knew exactly what we would get from Kennedy and what have gotten and will continue to get from Blanche, and he did it anyway. If you have any respect for the Constitution, the decision on Blanche is as black and white as any confirmation in history.
@drsimonegold Just about everything you claim as fact is either an outright lie or unproven. You are also a convicted J6 rioter sentenced to 60 days for your actions on that day. Go away.
@piersmorgan Because he was appearing before a committee led by somebody who has said multiple times, including as recently as last night, that he was entirely focused on putting him in jail? This isn't complicated, but I suspect you know that.
@PastorJAPauley3@hemantmehta Wrong. Using "in the Year of our Lord" was simply the standard legal and clerical dating convention of the 18th century—the era's version of writing "A.D." or "CE."
Treating a clerical date line as meaningful when the rest of the document is explicitly secular is disingenuous.
@JayaGup10 Before you can capture institutional judgment, you must define what the institution actually is. An agent in your write path needs more than process. It needs principles, tolerances, reasoning frameworks that make it yours. That's not a training problem. It's an identity problem.
@ronrule@Dragonslayerk10@BenjaminNorton@rayamanoha You are completely ignoring the ability for the ultra wealthy to mold the overall structure of our system to their benefit and to the detriment of the middle and lower classes. Elon spent $250m (that we know of) to help Trump get elected to help himself, not the rest of us.
@BillAckman Trump decided to blow up a world order that had the United States as the dominant economic and military superpower, and for what? Modest improvements in global tariff structures? To move low-skill factory jobs back to the US? The cost-benefit analysis never justified this.
@LLH713@KingBawkBawk@YAppelbaum Then go back and review the five SCOTUS cases I shared as proof of the constitutionally granted right of due process for all people, not all citizens. None of those cases were focused on birthright citizenship.
@LLH713@KingBawkBawk@YAppelbaum SCOTUS cases that confimed due process as a guaranteed right for non-citizens:
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) Boumediene v. Bush (2008)