Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆

🏹🐅🎣

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

The last time when this landscape was the richest part of this world: it all incepted with the swearing-in of King Raja Raja Cholan a.k.a Arunmozhivarman, 1036 years ago.

#TamilsPrideRajaRajaChozhan

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@tskrishnan In an avestan mythology, sroasha was born in a sacred mountain top and from a divine energy.

And in Rabatak Inscription, king kaniska says he wants to merge stories of deities of India and iran. He mentions sroasha and skanda in it 🤣

So these aren't vedic but Iranian 🤭🤭

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@ExploreKannada It was in father of world navy immadi pulikesin's ship deck bro.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

Based on archeology,

Tamizhi -> Ashoka -> kadamba.

Megesthenes visited on Mauryan Country in 302 BCE. He didn't see anyone writing.

First ashoka edicts 260 BCE.

Tamizhi potsherd 585 BCE.

But according to Kannadigas,

Kannada with first Inscription y 475 AD is older. 🤡

[wittyhumour @wittyhumour1]

@Thought_Wander @Konga_Slayer Look how u rattled… Sanskrit and Tamil had no script until 8th and 6th century respectively… where do u bring in Tamils here??? The script is not Brahmi and language is Prakrit…. When would u learn this part of history…

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@LalitAditya1212 @Vignesh90295553 Even Rig veda talks about slaughtering animals and sacrificing in yajna and consume it as prasada.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@Dinakar_AP What script? Lol 😂😂😂 someone tell this Goltoid that Proto-dravidian hypothesis have no native script. The first ever script a Dravidian language have was Tamizhi which predates Ashoka by 300 years. Bhattiprolu was indo-aryan prakrit.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer Psycho, Sanskrit never had its own written script. You gonna say sanskrit never existed? 🫵🏽🤣 Before 200 years, historians called brahmi as Ashoka because he used it first. Now it's very clear, Tamils used that script 300 years prior to Ashoka. Then they started to call Tamizhi

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer Paithyakara! I will tell you again for one time. Tamil nadu and srilanka used brahmi script 300 years prior to ashoka. It wasn't called brahmi during that time, it was historians named it. It was Tamil script, used by Ashoka later.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer It's so evident you think from your ass..let me clarify you, Tamil brahmi is Tamizhi. Ashoka used it to write prakrit. Tamil brahmi is 595 BCE old Ashoka Brahmi is 250 BCE. Brahmi is the a script used in TN and SL 300 years before north started using it.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer Are you dumb? This Inscription was made by pandiyan nedunchezhiyan king for a jain monk. It clearly mentions. This is Tamil. Every tamil can read and understand. Do you even know Tamil brahmi predates ashoka brahmi? Basically ashoka adopted tamil brahmi to make ashoka Brahmi.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer This is 3rd century BCE... Can read whe understand. Maangulam Inscription, go and verify

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@chowdary_meghan @hsejarsa It's true post sangam bhakthi literatures are inspired by vedas Just like vedic stuff were heavily inspired from avestan mythological legends and topology. Some konderipuks have no idea about all these and talk madda.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@LalitAditya1212 This guy is losing mind.

Tamil is the mother of malayalam.
Renati cholas developed proto-telugu with sangam words for over a century n made d first full Telugu Inscription.
Thyagaiah's works are inspired by Pannisai.
Tamil is the standalone SI language can survive wo sanskrit.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@chowdary_meghan @hsejarsa Yes, same, except some stupid gultoids, most telugus are humble. They agree that thyagaiah composed those based of thirumarais and Pasurams made in pannisai. Only online gultoids deny this and argue for no use.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer Brother, Tamil has 900 year older Inscription than Halmidi and 43 literatures before kavirajamarga. What are you talking about? This is a hypothesis. Proto Dravidian is just an assumption.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@Cricket_live247 2 man of the series in T20Is, crucial 49 with bat in hobart win in australia and helped series win. 51 wickets with 7.05 economy T20Is.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@tirumuru_87 A Well made hyderabad briyani would outplay everything.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@Konga_Slayer Amman shrine is built by pandyas, only murugan shrine, channakeswara and nandi were done by telugu nayaks. Marathas built entrance and and outer walls. Pillared pavilions was done by Raja Raja cholas commader krishnan Raman under his direct supervision.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@AdiSpeaX My point is only stupids will tell sanskrit is the mother any dravidan langauge.

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

And Sanskrit that belongs to indo-IRANIAN linguistic family be like..

[Luger🐉🚩 @VeeraRaghava992]

Sanskrit is Father of Tamil

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@wittyhumour1 @Konga_Slayer This isn't witty or humour. This is abysmal

[Thought-wanderer - 𑀧𑁄𑁆𑀷𑁆 𑀆𑀢𑀯𑀷𑁆 @Thought_Wander]

@AdiSpeaX Why shouldn't it matter to specify what family it belongs to? It's for the stupids who claim sanskrit is the mother of any Dravidian languages. India has seen 2400 years of classical Sanskrit, but Vedic Sanskrit is a sister language to Avestan than to indian indigenous langs.