![TheLastRefuge2's tweet photo. ANSWER (with example & citation):
As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his banking platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk. He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition.
[Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better“]
President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented. This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.
HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients. The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.
While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured. This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.
This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.
Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector. Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.
Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance. Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions. This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.
Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda. However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.
The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA. The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.). Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.
You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.
In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.
This is an example, but this is not about energy policy, climate policy, the concern for the planet or even children exposed to social media, the latest cause' celeb.... This is an information war, and the purpose of the war is CONTROL.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HK21JSkb0AA_ncq.jpg)
![TheLastRefuge2's tweet photo. ANSWER (with example & citation):
As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his banking platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk. He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition.
[Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better“]
President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented. This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.
HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients. The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.
While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured. This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.
This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.
Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector. Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.
Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance. Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions. This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.
Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda. However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.
The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA. The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.). Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.
You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.
In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.
This is an example, but this is not about energy policy, climate policy, the concern for the planet or even children exposed to social media, the latest cause' celeb.... This is an information war, and the purpose of the war is CONTROL.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HK21JSkbUAE6hjV.jpg)
![TheLastRefuge2's tweet photo. ANSWER (with example & citation):
As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his banking platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk. He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition.
[Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better“]
President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented. This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.
HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients. The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.
While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured. This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.
This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.
Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector. Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.
Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance. Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions. This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.
Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda. However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.
The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA. The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.). Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.
You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.
In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.
This is an example, but this is not about energy policy, climate policy, the concern for the planet or even children exposed to social media, the latest cause' celeb.... This is an information war, and the purpose of the war is CONTROL.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HK21JSjaoAAnL3X.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Tom Stone
@TomStoneKnows
Still celebrating Cackling Camel Harris's Defeat!
Trump Elon & RFK are fixing everything.
MAGA | Free Speech Warrior | Pro-Truth
Warning: I misspell words often
Clearly now
Joined August 2021
6.2K Following
6.5K Followers
36.5K Posts
Pinned Tweet
Remember when Julian Assange @wikileaks published Hillary's emails proving she rigged the primary & stole the election from Bernie
& then Hillary said look Russia, Trump
& the Dem victims said Trump BAD!!
Then Julian went to jail
Dems Because... Fact Checkers & Science!!
Britain now arrests more people for social media posts than China, Russia, and Turkey combined nearly matching the rest of the top 10 countries combined
Britain really leads the world on these thought crimes
Insane how the UK, which used to be a free country, turned out to be so totalitarian
An OMG journalist spent the past eight months undercover inside New Jersey ANTIFA, infiltrating the private Signal chats of a group known as NJ BURN.
What we uncovered proves ANTIFA is not just an idea. It is a network of real people organizing, coordinating, and operating inside America.
Inside the group's Signal chats, members discussed plans for port blockades, riot activity, support networks for criminal defendants, and celebrated acts of political violence. Using names, profile photos, and digital receipts, OMG traced individuals to positions throughout some of America's most influential organizations.
The same network connected to disruptive port blockades in New Jersey was also active during the unrest surrounding Delaney Hall, where activists confronted law enforcement and journalists outside the immigration detention facility.
Among those identified were an engineer affiliated with @OpenAI & @OpenAINewsroom, an AI Automation Leader at T-Mobile, Rutgers University students and personnel, a Princeton doctoral candidate, a former New Jersey congressional candidate and city councilman, board members connected to the American Civil Liberties Union, and National Lawyers Guild, and nonprofit executives with ties to United Nations-affiliated initiatives.
Some messages in the Signal chats showed these individuals celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination and hoped that the past attempts on President Trump were successful.
The American people deserve to know when individuals involved in activist networks also hold positions within institutions that shape public policy, technology, education, and culture.
These are not simply anonymous individuals organizing online. OMG identified numerous individuals and organizations connected to members of the NJ BURN network and reached out to them for comment. We will update our reporting with any responses we receive.
The identities referenced in this report are based on evidence gathered during our investigation, including social media activity, public records, and other corroborating information. Some identifications remain unknown, and additional information may emerge following publication.
Brandon Johnson is asked about the guy who set up the burning cross in Chicago:
“It's a painful reminder of how hatred towards black Americans still permeates in our society."
It was actually an Asian socialist’s protest against MAGA. Other than all of that, dead on, Mr Mayor.
🚨 For anyone tracking the under-16 social media bans in Canada and the UK, you might have noticed the government suddenly walking back some specific wording.
They backed off forcing you to upload credit cards or facial scans because of the public backlash, and now they’re pushing a "backend token system". It sounds less intrusive on the surface, but here is the truth about what that actually means, because most people are being completely misled by that marketing:
A cryptographic token isn't a magic, anonymous poker chip. To work, a token has to be anchored to something verified. That means your physical device, your phone carrier contract, or your real identity is permanently tethered to that token.
Every single time your phone throws that token to let you log into an app, it logs exactly who you are, where you are, and what you're doing.
It isn't a privacy shield to protect kids. It's a digital passport that tracks an adult's every move across the internet.
LOL - the SPLC had an entire page devoted to the extremist activity of THEIR OWN SOURCE to help attract contributions but apparently their over-the-top description of the source (F-30) was hurting his ability to recruit more "extremists" into his group. So SPLC toned down their language 😆
I just pulled up the superseding indictment covered in today's NYP article about the profitable love affair between a top SPLC official and a neo-Nazi.
But there are additional fascinating disclosures in the indictment related to other SPLC "sources"--designated by the letter "F" and a number--who were paid by SPLC to enlist "extremists" in order to help the nonprofit solicit more donations.
This is absolutely wild:
Europeans and American patriots!
Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.”
Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large.
I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted.
They cannot silence the truth!
Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷
President Trump Suspends DNI Nomination and FISA Support, Pending Save America Act https://t.co/sJ9gGhiACb
SUMMARY for those who might appreciate:
The government (DOJ/FBI) does not need any authorization from congress to conduct surveillance on foreign nationals.
There is nothing needed to spy on, intercept, surveil, or track the activity of a foreign national. The foreign person does not have any constitutional protection at all.
However, if an American is the target of secret surveillance, tracking, spying, etc., the DOJ/FBI need some method of authorization to violate the fourth amendment protection within the constitution. That’s where FISA (702) comes into the picture.
FISA (702) only pertains to an American in the surveillance process.
FISA (702) is the presumed legal method, never tested in court, that permits the DOJ and FBI to violate the 4th amendment protection of the American person.
FISA (702) only pertains to a legislative construct that permits this secret surveillance of the American person.
The Title-1 surveillance warrant that sometimes comes with the 702-authorized review or investigation; is all encompassing and authorizes the government to secretly look at the private records of the targeted American.
If FISA (702) did not exist, all of the electronic record keeping, the stored metadata of Americans, would be worthless.
FISA (702) is the key that allows the government to unlock the data (private records) and review it. Without the key, you cannot open the door – as a consequence, the U.S. government doesn’t need the vault.
FISA (702) has never been tested in court by any targeted person, in part because the evidence against the accused person only exists for prosecutorial use if the person is factually guilty of the suspected allegation. This is the catch-22 that has permitted the 702 violations to continue without challenge.
It doesn’t matter how many times our politicians try to position the argument, there is nothing that stops the DOJ/FBI from looking at the activity of foreign actors. However, there are constitutional protections that stop the DOJ/FBI from looking at the activity of Americans. FISA (702) is designed specifically to work around those constitutional protections.
ANSWER (with example & citation):
As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his banking platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk. He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition.
[Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better“]
President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented. This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.
HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients. The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.
While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured. This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.
This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.
Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector. Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.
Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance. Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions. This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.
Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda. However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.
The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA. The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.). Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.
You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.
In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.
This is an example, but this is not about energy policy, climate policy, the concern for the planet or even children exposed to social media, the latest cause' celeb.... This is an information war, and the purpose of the war is CONTROL.
![TheLastRefuge2's tweet photo. ANSWER (with example & citation):
As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, current Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used his banking platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk. He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition.
[Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better“]
President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented. This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.
HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients. The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.
While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured. This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.
This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.
Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector. Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.
Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance. Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions. This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.
Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda. However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.
The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA. The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.). Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.
You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.
In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.
This is an example, but this is not about energy policy, climate policy, the concern for the planet or even children exposed to social media, the latest cause' celeb.... This is an information war, and the purpose of the war is CONTROL.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HK21JSlakAEqaR_.jpg)
𝗗𝘆𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘄𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲.
I'll be honest: when I think of Dyson, I think of vacuum cleaners, hair dryers, and beautifully designed machines that make ordinary things feel strangely futuristic.
I do not think of strawberries.
And yet Dyson has built a vertical farming system with rotating rigs, robots picking ripe fruit, UV light reducing mold, and recycled heat and CO₂ feeding the operation.
What surprised me is not that Dyson entered farming. It is how they looked at farming.
Most companies improve the visible process.
Dyson redesigned the hidden system.
That is the lesson many leaders miss. The next disruption in your industry may not come from a direct competitor. It may come from someone who looks at your "normal" workflow and sees an engineering problem.
The future will not belong to companies that automate old processes.
It will belong to companies brave enough to redesign them.
Where in your business are you still improving the process, when you should be redesigning the system?
#OrchestrationDesign #HybridManagement #AIReadiness #AgriTech
@HansMahncke During the lawsuit against them, we will find out exactly which cretin wrote this terrible lie
German state TV has fabricated yet another total lie, claiming that Elon Musk called on the British to launch a "Jagd auf Migranten" ("hunt for migrants"). This is the same broadcaster whose US-based reporter repeatedly lied about Charlie Kirk, with zero consequences.
A rather oppulent office, no?
Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky.
Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky.
This proves one thing.
It's not about protecting children.
It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.
Labour must go as soon as possible
Never forget EU offered an illegal secret deal to Elon to quietly censor speech and do what they tell him to do, promising they would not impose any fines
Elon outright rejected the deal
So then came a $140M fine imposed on 𝕏 to go after Elon
You have no idea how corrupt and bloated the EU bureaucracy is
Welfare offices in 49 states are handing out voter registration applications to illegal aliens. No proof of citizenship required. https://t.co/JshPCpYHRC
🚨EXPOSED — New documents show Biden’s DOJ unleashed the full force of the federal government against parents speaking out at school board meetings despite concerns from the FBI and the National Sheriffs’ Association.
This is what government weaponization looks like.
The revelations six years later are pouring out so quickly that it is impossible to keep up much less mentally process all this:
* The Director of National Intelligence has documented 120 US-funded/owned biolabs in 30 countries many of which are manufacturing and manipulating infectious diseases.
* Senator Rand Paul's committee has released the receipts concerning US funding/backing of the manufactured SARS-CoV-2 virus/vaccine as part of this program.
* Senator Johnson has produced definitive evidence that US public health agencies knew of the grave dangers of the shot to everyone but said nothing.
* Many officials are privately admitting/proving that the whole point of lockdowns was to preserve population immunity for the shot and block other avenues toward wellness.
* Hardly any of this makes the national news and one wonders if the public mind has any awareness at all.
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.3M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.7M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.4M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.2M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.2M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.3M followers